PT Barnum and the Soft Con

Last updated on: January 8, 2018 at 3:20 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

PT Barnum and the Soft Con 2018-01-08T15:20:00-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

377A7396-3286-4D57-9E28-9DB26D8A32E2 Beware the soft con, the one that seems a bit like a joke.*

Over the Holidays, Barnum was in the air in our house with a fairly excellent movie having little or nothing to do with his life and the gift to me of an autobiography only remotely connected to the facts even if written by the subject. It was all enough to force me to read a more serious PT Barnum biography.

It was worth the time: PT Barnum was the Bill Clinton of his era, America’s first lovable rogue. He was a humbug who told people about his scams, but since they were entertained by the buildup and then the reveal, Americans forgave him. They even made him out to be a bigger scam artist than he really was . . . He did not think a sucker was born every minute and he liked his audiences who made him the equivalent of a billionaire.

His audiences were “victims” of a soft-con: a ripoff where the “victim” was still entertained. What the audience missed were the people (like slaves and “freaks”) that Barnum harmed in process of becoming a rich man. Of course, like most lovable rogues, PT Barnum was a complicated man. He left “General Tom Thumb” (Charles Stratton) much better off than he found him and advocated for some good causes. If he lied about having found a mermaid and sold us on a fake, we could visit his American Museum (our first Disneyland) and see lots of cool stuff anyway. He was right that Americans were (if anything) joyless with too few holidays and a grinding work ethic. Barnum loved his country enough to hope it could have fun.

Most of all, however, Barnum loved Barnum.

This was not the self-love of the diseased narcissistic man, but a person with bad priorities. Barnum loved his wife (both of them), daughters, family, state, and nation. He served them, but Barnum loved himself most of all. He was capable of inspiriting devotion, even friendship, but mostly he was capable of getting rich. The soft-con left the conman rich, but littered the world with victims.

Yet Barnum survives to this day by being a complicated man. He was a showman who was a Prohibitionist, a popular cause on the left of his day, never scamming too much, and delivering real value to his audiences with entertainers like the luminous Jenny Lind, the Swedish Nightengale, who could really sing and taught us to love fine music.

His service to Bridgeport Connecticut was positive. Barnum loved his nation, and ended up working for the abolition of slavery. This is hard to praise, given he had owned an enslaved person he used in an early scam. Perhaps like Tom Thumb, Joice Heth was materially better off with Barnum pretending to be George Washington’s nurse, but it was still an ugly bit of business.

Barnum was more than morally complicated. He was interesting and Americans have long forgiven people for much if they are not dull.

And that is the problem with PT Barnum and the soft con. We see the “victim” (the audience) and the old showman, Barnum notes he was called “old Barnum” before even reaching middle age, but we do not see the rubble left in on the sides. The soft-con participated in slavery, treated animals cruelly, and exploited “freaks.” Barnum pushed out to the edges of moral American behavior and crossed the line not with his audience, but with his workers.

Some of them like him, some did not. Barnum exposed harmful humbugs (like spiritualists) late in life, but got rich on lies. His distinction that we like being lied to has done little good in American history and continues to do great harm. The truth is hard, we all bend it, but to encourage and purposefully lie to people is not good . . . Even if we are entertained.

The practical joke ceases to be a joke when the joker makes money on the stooge or is cruel to some third-party to make the joke go. Telling a man he is now a father, when he is not, a Barnum practical joke, is callous and not so funny, but using an aged woman, or a disabled person, in an exhibition is cruel and exploitative.

It is not ok.

Fakery is not ok.

Making money on lies is not ok.

Being too kind to our Barnums is not ok. We all do things we regret. I have. Nobody lives up the standards we set. We are sorry, but to live a life on a soft-scam, to lie for a living, corrupts the culture.

————————————

*Terence Whalen wrote an insightful, and largely sympathetic, introduction to the version of the Barnum “autobiograph” I read that introduced me to the idea of a soft con.

Culture

On Books

Previous Post

January 7, 2018

Love Thy Body: Nancy Pearcey's Book, Brilliant if Flawed

Next Post

January 9, 2018 Thank You, Al Michaels: I do believe in miracles.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Isaac's wife?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Leah Rachel Sarah Rebekah

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »