The Handmaid’s Tale

Last updated on: May 13, 2017 at 9:55 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

The Handmaid’s Tale 2017-05-13T09:55:11-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Handmaid’s Tale is one of those not very good books that many people think is a great book at least for a short time.

I wanted to love this book, because I know if I do not love it, I will be dismissed. The cool kids love it. The kids I would like to be like love it. I did not even like it.

There is a plot, but not much of one. There are some beautiful passages, but also some very clunky ones and the ending is laugh out loud funny, I assume unintentionally. There is one character, Offred, and a good many other stick figures revolving around her.

The central character struggles to be herself in a misogynistic state. She is not just a woman, but is a woman and that has been and now is a problem. History is presented as a long story of misogyny nearly escaped in the mother’s generation only to end (for Offred). If Offred thought deeply, or her college education (before the changes) had given her any window to the history of her own culture, she might have had complicated reactions to the world.

She does not. Instead, Offred is presented with evil and twisted versions of traditional families. The dystopia has chosen to deal with a birth dearth in one of the worst ways imaginable and as a result, even worrying about the real world decline of men choosing to be fathers and women choosing to be mothers is tainted for any reader who takes the book as a warning. “Beware the cult of motherhood!”

There is nothing subtle in the book. Offred has lost her true name, she is “Of-Fred,” and even the possibility of friendship is spoilt.

The dystopia is against love matches, but the book’s tone is not much more hopeful when it comes to marriage. Sex is demonized in the dystopia unless it is loveless procreation. For Offred real sex is pleasurable and most vitally is a matter of choice and so freedom in her life. This is better than Gilead, almost any view would be, but still loveless in a traditional sense of love. Duty and morality are gone or Gilead twisted. (Offred had an adulterous relationship with a man she eventually married before the dystopia.) Love does not last, one must be free to choose and enjoy the emotions while they continue.

The most authentic emotion in the book is a near despair, a toying with suicide, overcome by a will to live.

It is important to be fair to the book which is not nearly so dreadful or hard on Christianity as contemporary advertisements for the television version make it seem. We are told The Handmaid’s Tale features a dystopian society that takes Genesis literally. It does not. Apparently everyone in the future has forgotten how to apply genre rules, cultural context, and the entire message of a text to particular passages of the Old Testament. The book describes a society that has misread and misapplied pieces of the Bible, but of course that would sell fewer books to the sort of people who think that in fact the Republic of Gilead is taking Genesis literally. As for the absurd contention that this is a twisted form of “Puritanism,” Gilead is nothing like actual Puritanism except for clothing. When I read that this dystopian world is just a few steps away in the age of Donald Trump. . . . the mind boggles. Trump is not two steps from Puritanism.

The book isn’t fair, but it does have some grace notes.

The story mentions Baptists, Catholics (pro-life!), and Quakers in the resistance to the forces of evil. Sadly, however, any principled conservative opposition to the dystopia is not given a voice. The “philosophy” in the book, the depth, is all the sort that one might have gotten in a decent undergrad cultural studies class in the 1990’s. In short, the book punches down at easy ideological targets who are powerless and misunderstood by the target readers. The grace notes end up sounding more like cover: “See! It is fair!”

Of course, I am not the target audience for the book. Women do face messages of marginalization. They are reduced to bodies, objectified, and powerful men are given a pass for evil deeds. The messages of Gilead: women are merely vessels for babies, sex is evil, and no woman should read or work outside the home have been and are preached by fringe groups in Christendom. If a person finds herself in such a group, she should flee to some good Baptists, Catholics, or Quakers.

If the book’s message is a balm in Gilead for hurting women, then there is good in the book. Still, this is a bad sermon as mediocre book…

Handmaid’s Tale is dumbed down Canticle for Leibowitz for the Planned Parenthood crowd. It is Twilight for the kid who grows up to teach English. There is nothing new here, with a good bit of ugly philosophy, fan-fiction for the 1990’s liberal, oddly dated even for those on the Left in an era of gender fluidity.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

May 12, 2017

A Great Change, a Graduation

Next Post

May 14, 2017 Unafraid of the Truth (On Mother's Day)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which is the only book in the Old Testament named after a woman besides Ruth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Miriam Naomi Deborah Esther

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »