Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Don’t Be Pumaman

Don’t Be Pumaman

Last updated on: May 10, 2017 at 8:47 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Don’t Be Pumaman 2017-05-10T20:47:24-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This beautiful creature has nothing to do with this ugly film.

The funniest single bit of video I have seen in the last year was MST3K: Pumaman. Somehow I missed this Laff-Riot when it was on the air, MST3K was must watch television in those days, but now my children are watching it and I joined them.

For those who have been deprived, MST3K is a chance for witty comedy writers to riff during a very bad movie. At its best, with films such as Manos: The Hands of Fate , cinematic straw is turned into electroplated gold chains. This may not be greatness, but it is good for a LOL.

Netflix has brought the show back and it looks as funny as ever, though I am watching the greatest hits of the old stuff before giving the new gang a chance. It looks promising. Here is hoping that they remain a bit in love with the cheesy movies and Midwestern sensibility. We have enough coastal riffs on film. Give us geekery for the flyovers, gang!

I have taught some film as text and helped start a fine film program, so I have seen my share of bad student movies. However, I shan’t mock them here, because the worst student film meant well. There was a genre of sincere movie making by Evangelical students in the 1990’s I call: “F Word Evangelical.” This type of movie refused to be Christian. In fact, it went out of its way to avoid anything resembling religion and also showed that (if he or she wished) the film maker could do naughty things. Generally this produced minutes of sincere, overwrought dialog about darkness, pain, and gritty realism. The dialog often was written by a kid whose actual life was super-pleasant, but his peers would have mocked any realistic film about his childhood as “fake.”

The merit of this sort of movie making was that a person (generally!) outgrew it and started telling stories again. You could always praise the movies in the same way a parent could put a kindergarten picture on the fridge: it isn’t objectively very good, but you loved the kid and the effort. Many a student film made it to our mental fridges as we praised progress and hoped (someday) for something watchable.

There was also the film made by the talented amateur for fun. If my dad’s generation shot home movies with a super 8, some dads and grandads my age shoot motion pictures. If you know the family, these can be fun and even entertaining. Our Victorian ancestors did weekend amateur theatricals and so we make amateur film.

All praise!

We need more “just for fun” stuff. Just don’t sell it, raise money for it, or get your non-profit to make it part of your job . . . that way lies Birdemic. Don’t go there. More “nones” have been created by witless Christian films that should have stayed family projects rather than anything this side of mega-church pastors and faith healers.

From Wikipedia for a fair use review of the film.

Pumaman is not a film by an amateur. It is not sincere. It is just bad . . . ragingly bad and shot on a budget. 1950’s Superman had a better flying effect than appears in 1980’s Pumaman. That is not o.k. Budgets are real, but nobody should ask somebody to pay for something like this film.

The script uses a standard superhero origins story, mixes in some casual racism, and then a dollop of self-knowing humor. If the writers had actually been self-knowing, they would have quit, kept their names out of the crawl, and burned the reels in a bonfire to preserve sanity.

People who make films like Pumaman deserve all the ridicule, because they can do better and have done better. They have sold out and then poured the pottage they got on our heads.

So why think about Pumaman?

First, the MST3K folks show us what can be done with dreck. We can make something of it. Those Midwestern comics turned their own cheap sets, bad films, and a low budget into something so good that it has been on the air for decades. Netflix revived a series that the coastal elites would not have made, because they did their best and that turned out to be delightful.

Be like MST3K.

The other reel contains films made by people who took talent and made wretched movies. Pumaman did not have to stink. It stank, because the challenges of a low budget, cheap sets, and a grinding schedule overcame them. They didn’t do their best, they churned out the movie.

And so it goes in life: some of us get challenges and make something good, even something that endures. Others of us give up, blame “them,” and churn out Pumaman.

We all will make something not-so-good, but we can all do our best even when we fail. Our friends will be kind and even take joy out of our meager efforts. Sometimes we will be blessed with some genius in the midst of our mediocrity.

Or we could make Pumaman: the shoddy product of a people who knew better, but turned in a half-effort.

Don’t be a pumaman.

Don’t.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

May 9, 2017

Listen to Hope!

Next Post

May 11, 2017 Questions from M: Illiterate Disciples, Written Gospels

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Ecclesiastes" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Teacher or Preacher Gatherer Prophet Judge

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »