Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Thanksgiving Dinner and Your Never Trump-Clinton Relative

Thanksgiving Dinner and Your Never Trump-Clinton Relative

Last updated on: November 21, 2016 at 7:51 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Thanksgiving Dinner and Your Never Trump-Clinton Relative 2016-11-21T19:51:51-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We stood at Armageddon and we could not find the Lord.

Five percent of the United States of America did not vote for Mr. Trump or Secretary Clinton. We are neither devastated that Clinton lost (oh blessed thought!) or thrilled that Trump won (the Republic lives!). Generally, we are the sort that put no trust in princes, refuse the lesser of two evils, and lose a great deal in this life hoping to win in the life to come.

Maybe.

This is the generous view of our natures. We might also be the sort still worried about the library book we “stole” in 1972 from the Penfield Public Library. There it sat, unknown, until one day we picked it up and realized: “We now owe more on this book than we are worth.” Sometimes at night, we wake up and think: “She knows. That librarian always knew when I checked out the Tin Tin books that I wanted them.”

You can be sure that we are not sure we did the right thing voting for McMullin, Johnson, or Stein. How could we be? We knew what we did not want, but we still cannot consistently spell McMullin, are not sure Johnson is sentient, and worry that Stein might be from an alternative reality. We tried to do no harm, but don’t know if we did any good.

How can you talk to us when the conversation turns, as turn surely it must, to the election? We face corresponding temptations and so in the interest of convivial bliss here are some tips:

The safest thing to say this year is: What hard choices we had this year!

This is safe, because there has yet to be a single year where the vast majority of Americans did not think the choices sorry. After all, we have always been a big nation and with rare exceptions it is hard to imagine that the two we get were the Ideal. A large number of your guests did not vote at all and of those that did vote, rarely will anyone have fallen in love with their candidate. If a person in 1856 thought Fremont, Buchanan, or Fillmore best suited to govern us, he later invested in Confederate bonds. If you lost a friend over his voting for James Cox over Warren Harding, you made a mistake and he got rid of a bad friend.

If you think that either Trump or Clinton was the obvious best choice, recall that you might be right, but the vast majority of voters disagreed.

It is too late to get our vote and it is too late for us to persuade you not to vote for Trump or Clinton.

Perhaps we should have jumped on the Trump Train or Been With Her, but we didn’t and weren’t, so quit. They claimed we had a binary choice and we said choose “no.” If that was wrong, then do a Frozen and let it go.

Yet every day something will happen in the news that stirs the third party voters’ outrage. By Thanksgiving, we can (unless we are careful) spend all of dinner rehearsing what WikiLeaks revealed about Clinton and what Trump hath wrought. “I tried to tell you,” is not persuasive months before the man has even been inaugurated.

Don’t agree to disagree aggressively (he says to himself)

My wife reminds me that dinner is not Twitter. The desire to have the last word at dinner and then cap it with “let’s agree to disagree” is irritating. It’s like the guy who wins a hand in poker and at that very moment notices the time and has to leave. It is not fair to say: “I guess the unborn were less important to you than your conscience.” or “Fascism in America doesn’t bother you as much as it does some of us.” and then immediately say, “But I guess we will have to agree to disagree.”

This is fine in social media where nobody ever gets the last word, but cruel to your Third Party Friend. Recall: we are less likely to grab the electric knife, than to add whatever you have claimed to our guilt list. We are (so we are told!) very conscientious.

Of course, never-Trump/Clinton folk face this temptation daily. No matter what happens, we can intone: “I told you not to vote for Trump.” or “You had to vote for Clinton.” We then can look at the ground, shaking our heads at the folly of those who lacked the wisdom to lose badly.

This is an unpardonable dinner sin. We promise not to commit it if you will not assume that we don’t care about life, liberty, or your happiness.

Don’t make the mistake of thinking “winning” or “losing” proves your point and force us into a painfully painful pained look.

We get it: if you were for Trump, you won! We rejoice with you. If you were for Clinton, you lost! We mourn with you. Why? The Bible commands that we rejoice with those who rejoice and mourn with those who mourn. Mostly, we third party types are less concerned about winning or losing in the short term and more about ideas. This may have been a mistake, but triumph does not impress us or defeat do much to discourage us.

We often take this to extremes. Some of us still toast at Pascha: “Next year in Constantinople.” This is . . . unlikely for 2017.

Just as you cannot convince a Brown’s fan that his quarterback situation will always be bad, so you cannot convince us to give up on our conservatism, libertarianism, or whatever it is that Jill Stein voters believed. We did not think we would win . . . the point was greater than winning.

On the other hand, we recognize that the pained looked that we sometimes get, something like constipation mixed with exaltation, when we are “explaining” our vote can be quite annoying. Particularly appalling is when we develop the beatific heavenward gaze of Joan at the stake as we explain our vote for Evan. We are trying to stop this habit, help us by leading us not into temptation.

We can do this dinner. In fact, the jollification will be great. We, the third party voters of America, promise to recall we might have blown it if you will recall the same.

And after all, weren’t the choices horrible?

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

November 20, 2016

Love Your Enemies: Thanksgiving for "Those People"

Next Post

November 22, 2016 In Which I Suggest Five Topics for Thanksgiving Dinner

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who preached the first sermon in Acts?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul John Peter James

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »