The Power of Paper: Our Constitution and the Demagogue

Last updated on: August 4, 2016 at 11:28 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

The Power of Paper: Our Constitution and the Demagogue 2016-08-04T11:28:46-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Constitution_of_the_United_States,_page_1_opt We have a marvelous, though imperfect, Constitution and unlike most politicians, the Constitution has gotten better with age. This document is so inspired and has worked so well for so long that a few are tempted to give the document superpowers.

The Constitution has a not-so-secret weakness: it has no power not given to it by men.

Someone once said to me that the Constitution was a secular document because it makes no mention of God. While it is signed “in the year of of Our Lord” which is not a reference to King George III, the Constitution is a secular document in the sense that it is designed to govern in the human, broken sphere. It is not a divine document, a product of revelation, and it must be given life by fallible human beings.

The term “secular” is confusing because it has several meanings. I could never support a document dedicated to “secularism,” but am proud that our Constitution is secular. What do I mean? The Constitution is not the product of “secularism”, the philosophy opposed to theism (the belief in God or gods), but “secular” as opposed to the home, church, or social spheres of a human life. Secularism leaves no room for religion as truth, the secular sphere is not governed by the rules of the church or family. No document dedicated to secularism could have been ratified or continued to be used by an overwhelmingly religious, in fact, Christian people. A secular document was ratified by Christians for everyone.*

The Constitution takes the classical and Christian perspective that people are broken: it is a government for men and not for angels. The checks and balances it sets up, between the states and the central government, between the branches of government, keep bad leadership from harming the nation. We are a republic and both the will of the people and the will of the elites are balanced against each other. The mob can be checked by the Supreme Court or by the Senate and the elites by the people’s House.

However, over time the power of the President has grown. Our chief executive can now create law through the vast federal system. It is no longer necessary to pass a law. In many areas a President can follow Jean Luc Picard and “make it so.” Presidents of both parties have contributed to this growth of power and there is no end in sight.

This is the problem with electing a demagogue, a man who stirs the emotions of the people, but not their reason. The powers of the modern presidency are great. He could literally order the destruction of humankind with our vast nuclear arsenal. He could remake our executive branch and our agencies in his own image if his narcissism was great enough.

I am confident that in the end, a demagogue would fail. The “other” party would oppose him or her and the American people retain enough love of liberty to awake to their danger. I hope we would awake before it was too late. The damage that would be done, however, in the struggle would be very great. The ruling party would almost surely be corrupted by the desire for “treats” from the powerful and forceful executive. Americans are not immune to a cult of personality around the Leader. Both Presidents Obama and Reagan developed a devoted following that might have proved a danger to liberty if the men had not exercised their power with a fair degree of moderation. Even Franklin Roosevelt, at the height of the Depression and World War II, was as close to a dictator as America has had, withdrew from confrontation and respected, to some extent, Constitutional limits.

We might not be so lucky again.

This precious idea, this document, this Constitution, cannot defend herself. She can only count on “we the people” rising up to keep the demagogue from power. This is why before we vote, the American people must decide: are the candidates unhinged? Are they subject to extreme narcissism? We can survive the merely venal, but the man who looks in the mirror to see the face of God is a present danger to the Constitutional order. There is a reason that we elected Dwight David Eisenhower and not the American Caesar, Doug MacArthur, a man altogether too fond of himself.

Look at the candidates: Clinton, Johnson, Stein, Trump. You may agree with none and dislike all three, but the demagogue, the man for self and not for party, Constitution, or the old ways is the greatest danger to our wonderful Constitution. She cannot protect herself. Will we?

————————————

*The Framers were a mixed lot religiously. Some would have been happy (generally) with the beliefs of the Orthodox Church and some would have viewed it as “superstitious.” Some were evangelical, some deists, and some had few religious impulses at all.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

August 3, 2016

Day of the Demagogue

Next Post

August 5, 2016 We have failed because we have embraced lies . . .

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who had a coat of many colors?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jacob Esau Benjamin Joseph

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »