Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
People Kid Themselves: How Religion and Science Can Fail Us

People Kid Themselves: How Religion and Science Can Fail Us

Last updated on: August 10, 2016 at 2:20 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

People Kid Themselves: How Religion and Science Can Fail Us 2016-08-10T14:20:51-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Saint_Peter_the_Aleut_opt

Image from Wikicommons by https://www.flickr.com/people/26904282@N00

Atheists sometimes pretend that if we all just followed “science,” bigotry and intolerance would cease.

American treatment of First Nation (“Indians”) shows this is false.

Religious people sometimes imagine that if we all became more religious then bigotry and intolerance would cease.

American treatment of First Nations shows this is false.

Most Americans have been Christian from the colonial period to now. American non-Indian Christian treatment of First Nations, including brothers and sisters in Christ in those nations, has ranged from paternalism to hostility. We created religious justifications for our crimes against these folk. To give just one example, some Christians stood up against President Andrew Jackson’s forced removal of Indians, but too few to make a political difference.

There is no doubt that American Christians had a guilty conscience about our stealing of First Nations’ lands, the lies that were told, and even the accidental harm done by exposure to diseases brought by contact between the people groups. This shame was justified, but the Christian reaction continued to lurch toward paternalistic solutions imposed from the outside. We tore apart families through boarding schools and destroyed cultures in wrongheaded approaches to missions.

Christianity provided the ethical and intellectual resources to avoid these mistakes, but non-Indian Christians tended to see the errors after the harm had been done. For patriotic Christians, this guilt produced a tendency to retreat from continued issues and pretend that the whole mess would go away. Why talk about these issues? Christian school curriculum often ignores the history of the First Nations or relegates living cultures to the past.

Was Christianity the problem?

We know it was not, because increasing “secularism” or “scientific” approaches to the “Indian problem” did nothing to improve the situation. Arguably, it took an awful situation and made it worse. First Nations were relegated by “research” and “best science” to a perpetual childhood. American non-Indian Christians had a theology that demanded that they love their enemies and that all people were related. These theological ideas are so central to Christianity that they could never be totally ignored or ignored for long.

“Reasonable” people could outgrow these ideas when “science” showed them that Christian uplift for all people was unnecessary. If Christian charity had been harmed by too much paternalism and failed implementation, secularization allowed Americans to dispense with charity or moral obligations altogether. The government might as well save money, because First Nations were incapable of being educated since “science” showed they were inferior. Even if “race” was rejected as a category, “scientific” views of culture placed Indian civilization in a dying or inherently inferior role.

Christianity, with roots in the past, is never totally comfortable with “social progress,” but early twentieth century secularists had no such restrains. Old folkways were never hallowed, but always primitive.

However, Christians should not be triumphant at all. Non-Indian Christians quickly folded to the new “science” since it confirmed contemporary prejudice. Too often American Christians held the line on side issues (such as opposition to alcohol abuse in both communities), but secularized precisely where courageous consistency could have helped.

Both science and Christianity contained resources that led to corrections in both communities, but only after great harm had been done.

What went wrong? What can we learn?

Let’s start with five lessons:

Christians must listen to other Christians. Often non-Indian Christians looked at the “Indian problem,” but if they had listened to First Nation Christian voices, they would have discovered they were the problem.

Scientists of one era should know they have moral blind spots that can twist research. My grandparents’ generation was taught racism as fact. Only religious beliefs stood as any kind of check against barbarism. Science does self-correct (at least as far as we can tell!), but great harm can be done. Just as a totally “free market” might eventually punish malefactors, but only after their pollution and abuse of employees has killed many, so self-correcting science may do great harm before things are corrected.

When it comes to people, we should start with “do no harm.” Christians and secularists should have assumed some things they believed were wrong or were being applied badly. All people should be much slower about projects and plans, even projects and plans that have noble motives and are “fact” based.

Believing a truth is no protection against self-deception.

Christianity makes true claims about reality revealed by God and confirmed by reason. This is good, but people apply those truths and people make mistakes. We learn, but while learning we can use the truth to harm other folk.

Similarly, science is one powerful way of finding truth about certain parts of reality. It is (generally) self-correcting and used well, can do great good. However, scientists are people and science is not an ethical program. Attempting to live by “reason” or only on “scientific facts” can easily become monstrous.

Secularism and religion are not science, both can and should use science, but can also corrupt science.

There is no safe haven from deception because religion, science, and secularism are all inhabited by people and people are easily deceived.

Cultures are worth preserving.

The loss of any human civilization is a loss to every human civilization. Because we are God’s Image, every culture that lasts has something good, true, and beautiful to teach all the rest of us. Because we are all broken, no culture, not even “Christian” cultures, has a corner on goodness. The idea of “progress” is nonsense in many areas . . . we can do more things, but perhaps many of them are things we should not be doing.

In this political year, perhaps a great loss is our nearly total ignorance of American Indian issues. Those of us who are non-Indians still tend to discuss “them” when something (the name of a sports team?) intrudes on “our” space. We do not listen and so five million souls are made silent.

Even this article, with a focus on past mistakes by the American majority, is too centered in the past and on the actions of the majority. To make progress, the majority should hear the living story of a minority.

We should listen, learn, and do as little harm as we can. Restitution may have to be made, but the past shows that “white guilt” or a rush to help is more dangerous than benign neglect. The United States of America has First Nations as part of our history, our present, and our future (if that is their choice). This is not a “problem” for the majority to solve, but a chance to (finally) listen, learn, and get something right.

If for no other reason, Christians must do so, because we are commanded to do so by the Almighty.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

August 9, 2016

Stop Helping: the Dangers of Religious and Secular Charity

Next Post

August 11, 2016 The Temptation of the Team

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Paul taught the Galatians that circumcision is necessary for salvation.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »