Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

eidos

On Misogyny: Disqualifying

Last updated on: August 1, 2016 at 7:06 pm   by John Mark N. Reynolds

On Misogyny: Disqualifying 2016-08-01T19:06:28-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Seal_of_the_United_States_Supreme_Court_optRoger Ailes polluted the conservative movement with his misogyny for decades. Who knows how his behavior warped the process? How many good reporters were lost? How many stories were spiked as the news network spent resources and time covering up for his vices.

God have mercy on us.

An open racist can no longer run for national office in the United States of America. In fact, even a plausible accusation of racism can derail a court appointment or cabinet level nomination. A candidate might have other merits, but racism is disqualifying.

Nobody is perfect, we never elect saints only sinners, but a pattern of racism or racist dog whistles means a candidate cannot earn a good person’s vote in the United States of America. We have made some moral progress and the general consensus that we will give up the services of any racist (that we know is racist) is part of this progress.

We should apply the same rule to a pattern of demeaning women, certainly to a Roger Ailes. Whatever his merits, he was a misogynist. Roger Ailes created a hostile work place for the women he hired and that was bad. Some fringe talk radio hosts (not my friends!) would respond that this is political correctness or requires being a “feminazi.”

Feminism is a complicated word. In one sense (votes for women and equal treatment before the law), feminism won. We are all feminists. Surely the movement has split and made other demands since the heroism of the suffragettes and pro-life women like Susan B, Anthony. Their views are not controversial, because they won.

No gentleman, prior to feminism, would tolerate the behavior we saw from Roger Ailes. Just as a practicing racist should never be President, so a practicing misogynist should never again be in the Oval Office. I say that as an old fashioned gentleman, not as a feminist. I agree with Theodore Roosevelt that no cad or roué is fit for the Oval Office. It is unworthy of a gentleman to live a life that treats women as objects: it is a sin.

I am also a feminist in the nineteenth century sense: Susan B. Anthony is in my University of Rochester DNA. There is no place for a person who uses women as tokens. “I help the women” is as offensive as “I help the blacks.”

I will not vote for any person who treats women as objects or prizes to be won.

It is worth pointing out that my grandmothers were born in a nation where they could not vote. Women were not allowed to go to college programs. Friends of mine were discouraged from pursuing higher education or careers in science, because they were women. I do not like Clinton or support her policies, but I am glad that a woman has a plausible chance to be President.

Nothing compares to race in the United States, but sexual discrimination comes close. African-American men could vote (in theory) long before African-American women.

All of this is to say: no misogynist candidate has earned my vote.

No woman who favors abortion for women babies has earned my vote. No man who uses women as toys has earned my vote.

Anybody who knows me will know that I am not perfect on any score. I have sinned and do sin:  I do not hold myself up as a moral example. As one dear friend pointed out, many Presidents have privately used women as objects and I have voted for them.

But so help me God, I will never vote for a man or woman who does so again if I know it. I will not do it for a Supreme Court pick or all the good in the world.

No gentleman, and I aspire to be one, could. If there is no lover of all humanity, no sinner in process, then I will not vote for that office: no racists, no misogynists.

Lord Jesus Christ, son of God, have mercy on me a sinner.

 

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post



July 31, 2016

Lincoln on Liberty: We are much in need of him.

Next Post



August 2, 2016 On Fascism and Demagoguery and This Moment


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet had a vision of God standing beside a destroyed altar?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micah Joel Ezekiel Amos

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »

Related posts from Eidos

Evangelical

Classical Education and the Art of Dying Well

Eidos

Evangelical

Golden, Golden, Golden: My Mother's Last Lesson

Eidos

Evangelical

The Old Words Are Helpful

Eidos

Evangelical

When the Center Holds: A Tribute to My...

Eidos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube