Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
The Worst Argument For a Bad Candidate: Irrational Hope

The Worst Argument For a Bad Candidate: Irrational Hope

Last updated on: July 17, 2016 at 9:21 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

The Worst Argument For a Bad Candidate: Irrational Hope 2016-07-16T22:31:45-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Election_poster_for_John_C_opt How was he doing? “Tolerable,” was the old man’s response. If you are a Christian in government, that is your goal. How is your candidate?

Tolerable.

Sadly, Americans do not always get to choose between tolerable candidates. Imagine having to choose between a Democratic former Secretary of State with deep moral problems and an erratic Republican with a temperament unfit for office.

That was your choice in 1856 and that wasn’t tolerable.

Some suggest you should find the lesser of two evils and vote for him. We tried that many times in church history with dreadful results. One of the worst was when Stalin was killing millions of Christians. What could be worse than that? Too often we voted for Hitler or Mussolini types (or even Franco!) because nothing could be worse than Stalin. Not only was this wrong, but we became tarred with the association. The church of the martyrs got used by the fascists who hated us any way.

Never vote for the lesser of two evils unless you wish to be responsible for evil.

Yet some good friends have defended a vote for Fremont (who after all probably got our family ballot in 1856). They have said: We know Buchanan will be bad (look at his record). Fremont is not a politician and he says the right things. We will get better justices than Taney, and Jeff Davis will not be in his cabinet.

This seems persuasive until you think about it.

Any reasonable person could see that Fremont was . . . erratic. Making him Commander in Chief would have cost us the Civil War and most importantly doomed millions of African-Americans to decades more enslavement.

Buchanan was, however, the most incompetent President in US history. He was ineffectual, decadent, and limp in the face of the coming conflict.

Why not vote Fremont?

He is unfit for office, but Buchanan is more unfit. Isn’t there hope in Fremont?

There is where a virtue, hope, separated from wisdom becomes a means for good men to do very bad things.

Let’s examine the possible outcomes in voting for Fremont:

First, Fremont might win and surprise us with a good cabinet and excellent justices. Dred Scott might be avoided!

Second, Fremont might win and act erratically and so lose the “irrepressible conflict” that Lincoln won.

Third, Fremont might lose.

In two of the three cases voting for Fremont is a bad idea. If Fremont loses in any case, why publically associate our cause with an erratic man?

Imagine a newspaper editor in 1856 (a talk radio host of 2016!) who backed Fremont. When Abraham Lincoln came around in 1860, he would need all the help he could get. Sadly, the editor would have beclowned himself with Fremont.

If Fremont loses, then all the moral compromise necessary to swallow hard and vote Fremont was for nothing. To sell your soul for victory and then lose is worse than Esau: at least he got the soup.

In the second case, Fremont wins! The GOP is triumphant. Sadly, Fremont does what reasonable people would expect an erratic man to do: he is erratic. Now we have not only failed, but we have harmed the Republic.

To sell your virtue for the White House, get it, and then ruin the White House is the worst outcome.

Imagine the first case: Fremont wins and surprises us all. He is a good President. He appoints good justices and wins the War. This is good and we are justified.

Or are we?

We will have taught the Republic a very bad lesson. Character and fitness do not matter. We can bet on luck . . .and the audacity of irrational hope to carry the day. The next Fremont that comes along . . .a con man with snake oil to sell . . .will not work out so well, but we will keep waiting for Fremont.

Our luck in the short term, against all evidence, will have produced a gambler’s mentality. Anybody is fit for office. Why wait for honest Abe when you can have flashy Fremont?

In short, if a man is unfit for office, then he should never get our vote.

So what should we do? The virtue of a republican is patience. Wait. Trust what integrity can do. A better man will come if not this year, then in 1860. If we are one election from doom, the Republic cannot be saved in any case. Conservatives after all do not think politics is that potent!

Most of all, there is no case in Christian ethics for voting for Fremont just to save us from Buchanan. Times will get tough, they usually are, but if we refuse to do evil that good may come, then when evil comes, we will be ready to help.

That will be tolerable.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

July 16, 2016

Bad Arguments Make Good Men Do Bad Things

Next Post

July 18, 2016 Terrifically Terrible Prayer

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Revelation say about anyone who adds to the words of the prophecy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They will be judged God will add to them the plagues described in this scroll They will be cursed They will lose their salvation

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »