Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
I am not Howard Roark or Mark Studdock

I am not Howard Roark or Mark Studdock

Last updated on: July 12, 2016 at 8:38 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

I am not Howard Roark or Mark Studdock 2016-07-12T08:38:23-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I am told that Ayn Ra Ayn_Rand_disegno_opt nd did not like CS Lewis.

Yet having read Fountainhead over this Saturday*, I am convinced she should have given him more credit than she did. Her Fountainhead shares a theme with his That Hideous Strength.

She loathes the “secondhander” … the man who loses his self by giving up self for the approval of other people. She sets up her hero, Howard Roark, as a man who lives selfishly. He lives for his own desires in pursuit of greatness in architecture. This greatness justifies almost any deed and Rand shows that society is (often) appalled by his brutal pursuit of excellence.

Like Homer, Rand believes that human excellence is virtue. Roark is a winner, a builder who means to go on winning and friendships are formed with those who can help him on his way.

Contrasting with Roark is Peter Keaton, the saddest sack of failure this side of That Hideous Strength. Keaton never does anything he wants. First he gives up art to become an architect at the bidding of his controlling mother (who lives only for him). Keaton thrives by being a Babbitt. He does not challenge the system, he ingratiates himself with the powerful. He gets all his energy and affirmation from other people. If Keaton is not being praised, then he is insecure and realizes his own mediocrity. Yet Keaton knows he is mediocre, so he can never be happy.

Roark is happy.

We should all loath the Peter Keaton spirit . . . the tendency to settle or to set our standards based on false desires. I have known leaders who destroyed their own values in order to achieve “great things for God.” If you don’t recognize yourself at the end of a ministry, then you aren’t serving God, but the desires of other people.

CS Lewis has a better written “Peter Keaton” in his character Mark Studdock in That Hideous Strength. Mark is a “spaniel” who never reads what he wishes, has the friends he really wants, or the job he loves, because he is always striving for the “inner ring.” Mark wants approval and he too ends up miserable just like Peter Keaton.

Rand and Lewis both hate “secondhander” living and when two such folk agree the rest of us should pay attention. Nobody should live as a secondhander. Lewis describes this desire for approval as a lust for the “inner ring.”

My mom confronted me at one point in junior high as I began to drift from what I liked to what the “cool kids” liked. My life was being driven by (dreaded youth group term!) peer pressure and not my sense of self. Mom was right: I needed to be myself.

Ayn Rand advocates selfishness and as an evangelist for atheism (“believe in nothing but yourself and you will be saved”), she was hostile to Christianity. She saw Christian faith as a tool that some secondhanders used to convince other secondhanders to live inauthentic lives.

If this were true, then Christianity would be wicked.

Christianity wishes a human being to be who God created that human to be. God wishes a man or woman to be the self that God created and nothing else.

Of course, Rand does not think God exists. This is factually wrong. God does exist as Creator and Redeemer. Rand is not wrong to reject being a secondhander (even to religious groups!), but she is wrong about reality.

This is never a good thing.

God does wish us to submit our wills to His will. This is, however, because He is perfectly good, beautiful, and our creator. As our designer, God wishes each one of us to be the person He made.

Rand hates to see a human grovel and she is right. No man should grovel to another man, but there is only glory in “groveling” to God. God is all power, all goodness, and all love. He wants to restore us to ourselves.

The problem with Rand is that she has no way to define “excellence.” She sees a mountain and can only see ore to build skyscrapers. Skyscrapers are good . . . and achievement should be celebrated, but skyscrapers are not all good. The demands they make on the environment, for example, might be too great. Man is an imperfect creator.

This is not a call to make men subject to the will of other men. That is Lewis’ point in That Hideous Strength. Men speak for God who have no right to do so. God sets us free.

God help me, but I reject being a secondhander. I want to be “myself.” Yet (as Rand would agree), I would want to be the self I should be and not merely what I am. My desires now are an uncertain guide to what I really want and need. As a result, God reveals Himself to me and to His church. I submit to Him . . . never (ultimately) to any human being.

The trouble is that I should not be Mark Studdock (Peter Keaton) or Howard Roark. He makes a different mistakes from the secondhander. He is too small because he has forsaken reality by denying that God exists and failing to account for Him.

As a result, he misses the ineffable in his pursuit of excellence. He could be himself and be humble, because God is not a man. God wishes what should be and has eternity to produce it. Rand is trying for Utopia now.

Rand failed as Roark would have failed in reality. Don’t be a secondhander, but do not forget God.

__________________________

*I am thankful to Hunter Baker (who should be in Congress if the voters of Tennessee are wise) for reminding me to appreciate what is good about Rand before attacking her.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

July 10, 2016

Love's Long Game (Race in America)

Next Post

July 12, 2016 Breathless Waiting: from Abstaining to Chastity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "What must I do to be saved?"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Nicodemus The Philippian jailer Zacchaeus

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »