Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Why does Bernie Sanders say he is a socialist?

Why does Bernie Sanders say he is a socialist?

Last updated on: February 19, 2016 at 12:57 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Why does Bernie Sanders say he is a socialist? 2016-02-19T00:57:59-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As a full grown adult, Senator Sanders was a socialist. He still calls himself a socialist.

What does he mean by it?

One form of socialism killed more people than any form of government in human history. Fortunately, communism isn’t the only form of socialism and Sanders was never a communist. Still, my friends on the left rightly worry about any nationalist who gets close to fascist rhetoric. Sometimes the comparisons become unhinged. If you don’t believe me, take any recent Republican President or Presidential candidate and Google his or her name and the term “fascist.” When an American calls himself a “socialist,” Americans have a right to some concern for similar reasons. Socialism has been horrific or ineffective for most of human history. Worry is reasonable.

This is true even if he is a “nicer” socialist.

In most of the world (Africa, Asia, South America, Eastern Europe), milder forms of socialism have produced poverty and tended to destroy democratic governments. As the government exerts more control over the economy, the rich move into government and poverty becomes a way of life. Those rare countries that have had the courage to adopt free markets and stick with them such as Singapore have prospered. Even communist states like China or the USSR under Lenin have allowed free markets to a limited extent to feed people and produce basic consumer goods.

If it were not for Western Europe, socialism would be an obvious and universal failure. In Western Europe, socialist parties have occasionally gained power, though they have generally been unable to implement their full program. They were able to nationalize some industries and (generally) provide larger government safety nets than exist in the United States. Despite this, no sizable nation has a better standard of living than the United States. Tiny nations such as Denmark, or oil rich Norway, have been able to support larger social systems, but they lack the diverse population or the military obligations of the United States.

Western Europe is declining in relative economic power, has a much lower standard of living than the United States for the average citizen, and faces demographic doom. I doubt a majority of Americans would want to take Western Europe as a model.

I am assured by many friends on the left that Sanders is just a very liberal Democrat and not “really” a socialist. He rejects government ownership of the “means of production,” though he could be merely in favor of “community” ownership. This old socialist dodge (now that state control has failed so spectacularly) means government is forcing owners to “give” their factories to workers. Sometimes this works, sometimes it does not. The end result is always an increase in state power.

There are few (if any) cases of “corporate” ownership on a large scale working without devolving into statist solutions. So why does Bernie Sanders call himself a socialist?

If he actually opposes state ownership, community ownership, and is just a liberal democratic, then why use a term that is freighted with trouble in the American electorate?

I think it is worrisome for three reasons:

It points to what he might wish he could do.

A pro-life candidate for governor of Texas knows he cannot do much about abortion in the state, but he has tipped off what he wishes he could do. Mr. Sanders refuses to lose the name . . . even he now says that he is a socialist. Why? Why not lose the term if it has no meaning? Doesn’t it tip us off to a disposition to look to government to solve problems first?

Why doubt that Senator Sanders would reach for state power faster than most Democrats? I do not. Even more worrisome is the fear that he is signaling the European socialist strategy: nationalize the popular stuff first (medicine, education) and then reach for the harder targets later. We only have his word that he has abandoned hard socialism. Why do we trust a politician from a movement that historically has advocated lying to advance the class struggle?

I do believe him, but his bitter clinging to a loaded term is worrisome.

It points to an ideological stubbornness that is unattractive.

Sanders was once a real socialist and he wasn’t young either. He was a serious socialist when he was my age! In Europe, democratic socialists have had to compromise their values to gain any power in the 21st century. Many are no longer socialists, but they cling to the name because it still has electoral resonance in parts of Europe. This is not Europe where there is a long, and sometimes noble socialist tradition.

Clinging to a meaningless term (if it is meaningless), points to an inability to admit that he was wrong, very wrong for decades of his adult life. If the policies advocated by Senator Sanders at the time had been adopted, the United States might not have won the Cold War. Shouldn’t he at least be a bit sorry?

It gives cover to state socialists.

Sanders calling himself a “socialist” while hollowing out the meaning allows true state socialists, with their horrid track record, to hide behind his skirts. Just as conservatives have a duty to repudiate any term that has racist overturns in the South, so Sanders has a duty to give no cover to American socialism of the strong sort. If he is afraid of offending socialist friends, then we cannot afford a President that concerned about the friendship of people who have adopted a disastrous economic policy.

Politics

Previous Post

February 17, 2016

Education: What Has Changed What Has Not

Next Post

February 19, 2016 Don't Kill A Mocking Bird

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the name of the lake into which the beast and false prophet are thrown?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gehenna The outer darkness The lake of burning sulfur (lake of fire) The abyss

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »