Thank You Andy Jackson, But You Should Not Have Been President

Last updated on: January 25, 2016 at 10:10 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Thank You Andy Jackson, But You Should Not Have Been President 2016-01-25T22:10:08-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Memorial at Jackson’s Greatest Moment

If only Andrew Jackson had never been President, he would have remained an American hero. Instead, he won and power was wholly bad for him.

Andrew Jackson was not a good President of the United States of America. He was an angry, unstable, and a tyrannical man who is responsible for one of the worst episodes in American history: the relocation of the Cherokee nation. Andrew “Old Hickory” Jackson founded the modern Democratic Party as the first populist candidate to win the office. Jackson developed irrational ideas about monetary policy that directly led to one of the worst depressions in American history. He was a slave holder who should have known better and crude to the point of barbarism.

Yet Jackson saved New Orleans, the greatest port in the United States, during the War of 1812. When I was in school, his victory was down graded because the peace treaty that ended the War had been signed before the battle, but that turns out to be wrong. Instead, the British were trying to seize New Orleans and used a cleverly worded clause in the treaty to keep the crucial port.

Only Jackson could have saved the City. I heard a guide describe it this way: “Jackson pointed out that the City of New Orleans might be burned by the British, but if they did not defend the City, Jackson would surely burn it. We were more afraid of Jackson than the British.” Given his career, that strikes me as about right. In fact, the War of 1812 was the perfect Jacksonian moment where all his virtues, resiliency, folk wisdom, courage, were needed and all his vices, temper, brutality, became, for just a moment virtues.

The trouble is that Americans came to think of Jackson as a “problem solver” in general when he was only competent in the particular. We all wish every problem could be solved by the bombastic snarl from Old Hickory. He was quotable, tough, and consistent, but he was also a bit lunatic and the highest office in the land did not belong in his hands.

Being President is an odd job . . . there are not really any comparative tasks, even in the early nineteenth century. That’s why Americans have always looked to temperament when they examined candidates. Abraham Lincoln had made a good living as a lawyer, was a political player, but had limited elective experience. He was our best President. Theodore Roosevelt was self-confident, bombastic, and loved using the “bully pulpit,” but he kept us out of war. TR earned his Nobel Peace Prize by helping end the Russo-Japanese War. For a variety of reasons, some related to painful dentistry, Washington was quiet, but was still the indispensable man in forming the Republic. Both Roosevelt and Washington prove a war hero can make an effective President.

What made Jackson a failure? He had courage, native wit, and the confidence of the voter. He had experienced hard times and conquered them. Jackson was stubborn, proud, and unwilling to compromise. He tended to surround himself with inferiors, see Van Buren, the Little Magician, who could never upstage him. Jackson reminds me more of the Quaker Nixon, than the war hero Eisenhower. It was not his courage, confidence boldness, or risk taking that were the problem. We have good Presidents with those traits.

Yet when we look at a candidate like Hillary Rodham Clinton, we must ask: does she have the temperament to lead? She will compromise, change, but all with the inflexible goal of more power and money for HRC. This is frightening. She is running less as a Democrat and more as HRC. This too is frightening. The GOP should avoid anyone like Jackson or HRC with a fixation on power.

Jackson was petty and inflexible. He knew he was right and pursued his rightness without deviation. He was an ideologue whose ideology was Andrew Jackson’s opinions. In short, he was a tyrant. He was a patriot with admirable qualities, but he was a tyrant. In the election of 2016, I fear the brash less than the narcissistic, the inconsistent less than the ideologue, the happy warrior less than the person driven to rule, the Jacksonian cult of personality more than the party man.

To run for President of the United States, a candidate will have done many good things, occasionally like Jackson a really great thing, but one great thing should never come with the Presidency as a reward.

Culture

Politics

Previous Post

January 24, 2016

LinLin the Dog: When Love Goes Awry

Next Post

January 26, 2016 Preservation Hall: A Good Thing in America

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the primary fabric used for clothing?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cotton Linen Wool Silk

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »