Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

eidos

All the Truth is Out There: A Lesson for Voters

Last updated on: January 13, 2016 at 11:02 pm   by John Mark N. Reynolds

All the Truth is Out There: A Lesson for Voters 2016-01-13T23:02:21-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

USATake one sentence in a long book:

“His failed presidency had given way to Reagan, who relied on an emerging army of religious zealots, “culture warriors” bent on restoring American values of godliness.”

― from “All the Truth Is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid”

This otherwise insightful book on the Gary Hart scandal is in line with the general attitude of the highly influential books on politics in the punditry.

Richard Ben Cramer’s book on the 1988 election What It Takes is both fascinating and infuriating.  It is a scholar’s nightmare: it claims sourcing, and I have reason to doubt the work was done,  but Cramer writes as if he knows what a candidate is thinking and feeling. He doesn’t just tell you what Dole did. He tells you what Dole is thinking. Vice President Bush did not really like or admire President Reagan. He has an almost pathological inability not to be friends with anyone he wanted to be his friends.

The genius of these books is that you cannot argue with them. The footnotes are not there. Maybe George HW Bush told Cramer this  . . . or his therapist (!) did, if Bush had a therapist. Cramer’s opinions are hidden as Bush’s actual thoughts.

What politicians are never thinking is about God unless it is escaping the God of the Nazarenes like Gary Hart or placating nut cases in the Republican Party like George Bush. When it comes to religion, there are only two good kinds: a childlike faith that helps “simple” people do good works until government can save them and a progressive religion that motivates a Biden, Dukakis, or Hart to do those good works.

When I am asked why Christians are so cynical of the media or experts, these books are a good place to start. 1988 was my first “grown up” campaign. I played a tiny part as a GOP delegate, part of the “religious right” while getting a doctorate in philosophy at a secular graduate school in upstate New York. Nobody I know is represented in these books . . . and people I know are misrepresented. Our faith is either belittled or demonized. When we try to learn, we are given books that are not true and we know are not true, because we were there. We are the people being marginalized, demonized, and belittled.

That doesn’t justify support for grifters and frauds like David Barton. It does not mean the Christian book industry and paid hack authors should puff up stories about Dr. Ben Carson (how stupid and unnecessary) in “his” books. However, the influence of David Barton is nothing compared to books that slander serious Christianity and influence the opinion makers. David Barton could not source his lies about Thomas Jefferson, but Joe Biden is right: the river of power (Cramer. 497) does not flow through schools where David Barton is read. Instead, the rivers of power flow through the Ivy Leagues where even Republican operatives read Cramer who does psychology without training on all his subjects.

Lie like Gary Hart with the right ideology and Cramer will spend pages softening the blow. Attack liberals in a Texas race like George HW Bush and Cramer will assume you are lying and the brilliant thing is that he never has to tell you how he knows what Hart and Bush are thinking. He just knows.

Combine this with any number of experiences many of us have had: we were in seventh grade and the teachers, following the establishment opinion, told us that we would have no gasoline. I was made to chant about “ecology” in seventh grade and told that the world would run out of oil long before I could be 52 writing this in a state (Texas) worried about recession as gasoline heads toward a dollar. We recall smart opinion mocked Newt Gingrich for proposing getting gasoline to a price higher than the current price of gas. “That Newt,” the punditry said. Newt was right. Where is his apology?

None of this justifies following blowhards or grifters, but it does explain why exposing them is so hard. When your every religious belief is mocked at best or viewed as so wrong as not even deserving refutation, folks can grow surly. They start to listen to extremists.

The good news is this: we will not. We know the bigotry of the punditry. We know that Washington GOP establishment types too often prattle about “school prayer” when we want jobs and our values protected. I once went to a meeting to talk about free trade as a young adult . . . only to have a GOP “player” say: “I favor school prayer.” They had me in a box and I was not allowed out.

Here is a warning for the GOP: you have educated yourself on books full of lies about your own base. You have fed us a steady diet of condescension and smarmy posturing. The folks are done with you. The good news is that the folks are still sound. They will not confuse Jim Geraghty with Richard Cramer forever. But somebody needs to tell those in the rivers of power that they have allowed know-nothing bigots to write books with unexamined lies to pollute their flow. They don’t get many of us, because even many of our leaders can no longer understand us. They see us through the lens that cuts Hart slack (he had ideas!), but would give Evangelicals none.

The first GOP candidate who understand that we don’t want Barton, but we want someone to defend who we really are will get millions of votes. Cruz should lose Barton or the great, youthful Evangelical middle will flee him. He assumes we are who Cramer says we are . . . and some are . . . tell a group they are lazy, shiftless, or fools long enough and some will make a virtue of being lazy, shiftless or fools. Most are waiting for someone who will tell the bigots, the lazy anti-Evangelicals they are wrong, and appeal to our better angels.

I see no desire to “blow up” the nation. People are still moved by a positive mission of service. They don’t like big government, big religion, or big business. What if someone spoke for them without anger, rancor, or condescension?

Who will dare swim against the “rivers of power?” This is the year to try.

Politics

Previous Post



January 12, 2016

Reason is Not Skepticism.

Next Post



January 14, 2016 GOP Debate: Live Blog of The Beginning of the End


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What kind of leaf did the dove bring back to Noah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Palm leaf Grape leaf Fig leaf Olive leaf

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »

Related posts from Eidos

Evangelical

Yet I Love Her: History and the Church

Eidos

Evangelical

He Thought He was Right: Liberality Must Kiss...

Eidos

Evangelical

Prayer for a Just Peace in Europe

Eidos

Evangelical

The Ad Celebrating Greece that Facebook Will Not...

Eidos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube