Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Do the Right Thing in Christian Ministry: Avoid Brocklehurst

Do the Right Thing in Christian Ministry: Avoid Brocklehurst

Last updated on: November 11, 2015 at 11:34 am by John Mark N. Reynolds

Do the Right Thing in Christian Ministry: Avoid Brocklehurst 2015-11-11T11:34:58-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Recently, in hard (but friendly) dialog with some non-theists, I was reminded how small the atheist media world is and how large the Christian enterprise must seem. The biggest problem with our Christian witness will never be atheism. Atheism is a small minority movement in any part of the world where it is not imposed by force.

All the atheist media produced this year will do less harm than the toxic and shoddy stuff produced by the Christian industry.

The biggest problem for our Christian religion is not our errors. Nobody is perfect. Open a ministry and bad people will attempt to use it for bad ends. Reasonable people get this fact. Our problem is when we tolerate evil or wrong, because the person doing it is on “our team.” We should never cut a Christian slack for behavior we would criticize in an atheist.

This does not have to be legalistic. People err and any big organization will do foolish things . . . intended or not, but there is a difference between doing a wrong thing and repenting and doing a wrong thing as a matter of policy. Let’s call this particular manner of running a ministry: to Brocklehurst. The Reverend Brocklehurst was a character in the novel Jane Eyre who preached simple living for the students and staff of his school while living in luxury himself. To Brocklehurst is to demand “modesty” and “simplicity” in the students while eschewing it at home. To Brocklehurst is to rage against the speck of sin in a student (Jane Eyre is a naughty child!) while instituting polices that would lead to an epidemic killing several students.

I got thinking about Brocklehursting because of Terry Mattingly, no Brocklehurst he.

The always provocative Terry Mattingly just sent out a column regarding the late, great Robert Briner, an Evangelical with competence and success in producing media. Briner wisely stayed out of “professional Christian” enterprises. Listen to Mattingly on what Briner experienced as he stepped out of “secular” media:

But Briner kept hearing one awkward question over and
over, after the release of his book “Roaring Lambs,” a bestseller
urging believers to get more involved in mass culture. People kept
asking if he was going to start producing “Christian media.”

Briner always tried to change the subject. Truth is, he
once told me, most of his fellow evangelicals would not appreciate his
answer. Many would be offended.

“I decided I wasn’t tough enough to work in Christian
media,” he said, a few weeks before he died of cancer in 1999.

“You see, it never offended me when secular people acted
like secular people,” he explained. “What I couldn’t understand was
why so many Christians I did business with didn’t act like Christians.
I found that things were actually worse — in terms of basic ethics —
in the Christian media than in the mainstream. That really hurt. So I
decided I wasn’t tough enough for Christian media.”

After decades of scandal in Christian media, does anyone doubt the truth of Briner’s experience? Why do we tolerate books by people ignorant of the topics about which they write, but with bigger names to sell the product than the actual experts? Why does the church tolerate healing evangelists who are frauds, but keep getting contracts with” respectable” publishers or media groups? Why do we tolerate fund raising practices that would be banned at any ethical organization, let alone a Christian one? My fellow Patheos writer Warren Throckmorton does a thankless and important job exposing the chicanery of men like David Barton or groups like Gospel for Asia. Briner saw Christian groups doing the full Brocklehurst in his era and Throckmorton exposes Brocklehurst behavior daily.

Wise woman Charlotte Bronte understood the nature of the Brocklehurst and can help us avoid this shameful behavior in our own lives and in our ministries.

The Brocklehurst strains on a gnat for others, but swallows a camel for self. The Brocklehurst family lived very comfortable lives while urging simplicity, poverty, and suffering on the staff and students of their school. If a group goes full Brocklehurst, they do well by doing good.

If anybody outside the Brocklehurst group visited the school, changes would be made. After an epidemic swept through the school, outsiders came to find out what was happening. The ministry mission was good, but they found the implementation was horrid. Big changes resulted. To Brocklehurst will also come with a culture of secrecy.

The first concern of a Brocklehurst will be the letter of the law not the spirit. Bill Clinton is an outstanding Brocklehurst while HRC tries the tactic, but fails. Bill never lies . . . if you read the contract, parse his grammar, or examine the nuances of his body language. HRC never received secret data (insert several qualifiers here) on her private server and so did nothing illegal.

The Brocklehurst ministry will do a great deal of good despite Brocklehurst. Better to get sent with Jane Eyre to school, where there were some fine teachers, than tossed to the streets. French was taught and learned. Students made friendships that lasted for years. All of this good could be used to justify Brocklehurst. Few ministries are so corrupted that their staff cannot do great good, especially if the rot is at the top.

A Brocklehurst generally will be unctuous and consumed with money, power, or position. Brocklehurst discovered that an extra meal (with cheese!) had been ordered without authority. This set him off. The fact that students were freezing was a fact never noticed because cold is cheap in England.

The prime example of going the full Brocklehurst in terms of unctuous behavior is Mr. Collins in Pride and Prejudice, though Trollope’s Rev. Slope gives him a run for it. Collins cannot stop talking about the merits of his excellent benefactress, praise one suspects would disappear if her wealth and ability to fund his living disappeared! A Brocklehurst cares about the opinions and favor of the rich (or at least the Christian rich) more than the workers and is most impressed by knowing them.

To be full Brocklehurst will leave the Brocklehurst making decisions outside his ken. The full Brocklehurst happens when ministry decisions are made by Brocklehurst, not the people doing the work. In Jane Eyre, the teachers do the work and Brocklehurst gets the credit for the charity.

Briner was right to stay out of the racket and as a result he inspired a generation of Christians in media. Let’s not get discouraged: for every Brocklehurst there are one hundred great servants of good like Miss Temple, the inspirational teacher in the Brocklehurst school, who serve God, not money. Miss Temple was self-effacing, charitable, kind, and worked for love and not profit. If she had been a film maker, and her students did learn visual arts, she would have made the best movie possible. Not everyone is called to work in a Christian ministry, but if we are, then we must double down on following the example of Saint Paul who would not use all his rights to avoid any hint of Brocklehurst.

God help us all to avoid the Brocklehurst and live like Temple if our calling is ministry.

Culture

On Books

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

November 4, 2015

Hope Does Not Disappoint

Next Post

November 6, 2015 What Ben Carson and the West Point Story Tells Us

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm did Moses write?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 23 Psalm 119 Psalm 72 Psalm 90

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »