What the Bible Does Not Say About Kim Davis

Last updated on: September 8, 2015 at 4:30 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

What the Bible Does Not Say About Kim Davis 2015-09-08T16:30:12-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When someone you like disagrees with you, then you should think about your position. All around great guy Eric Teetsel argues that the Bible does not support the actions of Kim Davis. Teetsel is a good thinker, so I took some time to examine his arguments. I think they fall short of the mark and I remain persuaded that Kim Davis is within her rights. She might have resigned, but she need not have. Her actions are well within the mainstream of Christian thought.

The first problem with Teetsel’s claims is that the situation of Kim Davis, citizen of a Republic, is not addressed in Sacred Scriptures in any direct manner. Thousands of years of (mostly) Christian thought on government have produced a unique relationship in the United States between a person and her state. Davis is not a subject of a King or Emperor, she is a free and equal citizen of a Republic.

She is a subject of no king, but King Jesus. The Bible helped create a situation that can only be indirectly addressed by the Bible. We tried to create a Republic where a weaker central government would interfere with the soul liberty of a citizen as little as possible. We did not make people swear, because Quakers did not take oaths. We accommodated pacifists nearly from the start.

Teetsel begins with Peter in the Garden at the arrest of Jesus. There Jesus rebukes Peter for using His sword. What Teetsel misses is that Jesus does not say: “Shall I not obey the government?” He does say: ” . . . shall I not drink the cup the Father . . .” Jesus had told Peter to buy a sword, but Peter was not to use it in this situation for God was placing this cup before Jesus. The other worldly Kingdom was up to something big, so Peter was not to fight. Of course, this does not imply that Christians are never to fight for justice or revolt as Christian apologist and philosopher John Locke explained in his Biblical case for revolution in the First and Second Treatise. The First is most important and persuasive for the Biblical case.

Like Paul, a Christian can appeal to the law to get what justice one can. Paul did not have to think his martyrdom was right, because having appealed to Caesar (as was his right), he had to “accept” the murderous ruling of Nero. Christians honor the civil law as much as possible, but not more than possible. When the law is an ass, we are free to say it is an ass. Paul’s argument was that he was no wrongdoer and so did not deserve death. If he was a wrongdoer, then death was just. This did not mean that when Nero sent him to the executioner , Paul thought: “By gum, I was wrong. I was a wrongdoer.”

Teetsel has read a subtle argument (Paul liked playing his enemies against each other) without subtlety.

The day may come when serving the American Republic in office is incompatible with Christian faith. Perhaps being a marriage clerk soon will be, but one need not rush to that day. If that day comes, then we will appeal to the twisted state when it upholds justice, obeying her when we can, and loyally paying our taxes when we must. For now, as part of “we the people” we have a right to question whether the state is rending a social compact we made with her long ago

This too is our right. The Bible that talks about honoring the King also shows a priest overthrowing a tyrant Queen. Thank God we are no place near that point either.

I belong to a church that is dying in nations across the Middle East. They appeal to the government when they can, foreign states when they must, and do all they can to live peaceable lives. They defend their families when they have the chance. No Christian can ever owe the state absolute allegiance, just provisional obedience. Kim Davis is not taking lives. She is simply refusing to obey an unjust law. The voters of her region can remove her, but they have yet to do so.

The Bible does not condemn her actions.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

September 8, 2015

Kim Davis

Next Post

September 9, 2015 Go Forth and Mentor!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Hebrews teaches that the blood of bulls and goats can take away sins.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »