Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Kim Davis

Kim Davis

Last updated on: September 8, 2015 at 4:03 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Kim Davis 2015-09-08T16:03:46-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Kim Davis is in jail for breaking the law.

If you are a Christian, you do not think this says anything conclusive about Kim Davis morally, because many people end up in jail for doing the right thing as the long history of American civil disobedience demonstrates. Other people win prizes for doing the wrong thing who should be in jail as executives at Planned Parenthood and some US banks also prove every day.

What about Davis?

She is a Christian, maybe an imperfect one, but a Christian. Nobody can be a Christian if their religion is confined to the walls of the church. Christianity is what guides a person in all their life decisions, not just a rooting interest like picking a sport’s team.

Kim Davis rightly knows that it is wrong to call immorality moral or to give state support to vice.

Of course, when a person runs a business, he often does not know what a customer is going to do with what he buys. The man who buys rat poison in the store may be off to kill rats or he may be using it to commit murder. A moral man should not sell the poison if he knows or even suspects immoral purposes, but he doesn’t have to give each customer a quiz.

A reasonable owner can assume good will in most people and so does business. If a customer announces that he or she intends to do evil, then a Christian would refuse to serve that goal or sell the product. It is one thing to bake a cake that turns out to be for a bad marriage and another thing to know that it celebrates vice.

The Supreme Court unjustly decided to change the definition of marriage and so now the state gives immorality a position that defies the laws of nature and of nature’s God. As a Christian, I believe in the rule of law, but the primary law is the law of God and not of government. As Thomas Beckett gave his life to demonstrate, Christians obey the government only when the laws harmonize with the laws of God. There is no gay marriage, because government cannot call “good” what God calls wicked.

Davis was elected by the people in her community and has chosen not to resign. She will not enforce an unjust and wicked law. The people of her community have the right to vote her out of office in the next election. She ordered her office to ignore the unjust law.

Most of this present government and establishment does not agree with Kim Davis and so Davis is in jail. She is paying the price for her disobedience and now her community will decide if they wish to keep her in office or keep her in jail.

Why is this one tiny act of defiance getting so much attention? At least a large minority of Americans (a majority in some areas) think the Court has gone too far and called evil good. If more Americans called on to enforce this unjust law refused, the Court would be powerless to enforce the law and Americans who support gay marriage know this is true.

If enough government workers in America just said “no,” then the one-size-fits-all solution the government forced on the nation would die. There would be no civil war . . . there would just be regions of the country with effectively different marriage laws. In other words, the world would be just as it was before the Court told all government workers in all jurisdictions they had to marry people who cannot be married.

Kim Davis is acting as Americans have always acted in the face of unjust laws. She is within the mainstream of the Christian tradition. We have long acknowledged that obeying unjust laws is no excuse for directly aiding immorality.

A pacifist Christian (and most Christians have never been pacifists) cannot vote for a war or participate in killing. Our majority culture generally has provided for “conscientious objectors” and not forced all those people out of all forms of government service. A Christian who thinks “swearing” is always wrong cannot take an oath even when the government commands it. The Founders of America accommodated those who would serve the state by allowing them not to “swear” an oath. The Supreme Court allowed no state, region, or territory any exemption from the Supreme Court’s morality. All parts of government must pretend that vice is equal to virtue. The rules changed while Davis was in office. National morality shifted in a day, but her own morality did not.

Generally, a government clerk does not and should not intrude on the details of people’s request for a marriage license. He or she does not know if the marriage is good or bad. A good clerk would not (of course) give license to licentiousness knowingly, but it is not her place to ask. In this case, however, the Christian clerk knows that the persons before her seek a license to sin.

She is right to refuse.

This leaves only a prudential argument. Is she right not to resign?

Is this the right fight at the right time? Is it a hopeful defiance? If this cause has been utterly lost, perhaps a traditional Christian will no longer be able to be a clerk. We have been banned from the job. Clerks, I am sure, gave marriage licenses to bad people last year. But last year, we did not have to give government license to people we knew were going to be bad. No government employee, after all, should give a gun license to somebody they knew would do bad things with the gun . . . even if the government told them to do so.

The reaction to Davis is overwhelmingly negative in establishment media right and left, but there is a ground swell of support for her from a sizeable minority. If millions defy the government, especially government officials, even if they are tiny minority, the law must change. We cannot have a national law that millions will not obey as our marijuana bans have proven. We try to enforce a ban that is ignored in some areas, randomly enforced in others, and consistently practiced in others. The law has broken down and so is changing or will soon change to a regional one.

The Supreme Court has spoken, but as Houstonian democrats might respond: the people have not yet finished the conversation. Kim Davis is testing whether there exists a sizable minority in and out of government that will not obey this unjust law. I would not have picked this issue, at this place, at this time. I would have resigned guessing that there exists no minority with the staying power to make a sacrifice worthwhile. Kim Davis did not agree and millions seem to agree with her. If they continue to stand by her, the Republic will have to find a new compromise on this issue.

Five justices on the Supreme Court made the decision that the American public would allow them to say what had been immoral for most of American history is moral. No Court in a republic can or should ignore whether a decision can be enforced. Making otherwise moral people scofflaws is corrosive to the Court’s power. The Court bet the nation would be eith them and give their consent to be governed by this change.

Kim Davis is about to show us whether the Court’s decision can stand.

Culture

Politics

Previous Post

September 7, 2015

Did Prayer make "War Room" Number 1?

Next Post

September 8, 2015 What the Bible Does Not Say About Kim Davis

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet had a vision of God standing beside a destroyed altar?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Micah Joel Ezekiel Amos

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »