Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

eidos

Badly Edited, Still Horrific

Last updated on: July 17, 2015 at 7:59 pm   by John Mark N. Reynolds

Badly Edited, Still Horrific 2015-07-17T19:59:11-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Washington Post is no friend of right-to-life groups. Read their story and then watch the video, if you can stomach it.

childHere is what nobody denies: an executive of Planned Parenthood calmly discusses crushing a baby during an abortion so she can salvage body parts while munching on her salad and sipping her wine. These body parts will be used later in medical research . . . and there may be a slight profit involved for the clinic (though that is being debated).

Nobody that is not utterly callous can watch this video and not flinch and so Planned Parenthood is engaged in the “Harriet Jacobs” defense: attack the errors, motives, and message of the unpleasant truth.

Harriet Jacobs was a brave woman who exposed the evils of slavery after her escape from bondage. Her book Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl is morally searing. After reading it as a young person, I lost all sympathy for the Southern cause . . . though I started with little enough. If you cannot defend the institution, one thing you can do is attack the way the message was delivered.

Jacobs’ story uses fictional names to cover for real people. She sentimentalizes the story and makes many of her characters morally one dimensional. If there is anything good to be said of some of her masters, she does not mention it. Jacobs is not being “fair” . . . she is writing from the horrors of authentic pain.

Slave owners knew how to object to such accounts. While Jacobs’ book came out during the start of the Civil War, such stories had been published before her own. It was easy for slavers to point out the errors, the fictionalizations, or the one-sided nature of the accounts.

What the slavers never understood was that the moral horror of the slave system could not be defended by picking at the fabric of an essentially true story. Were there good masters? Perhaps, but they still had the power to be “bad masters” and Jacobs showed how far that power went. As she hid in a garret, looking down on the world from a lonely ‘safe space,’ Jacobs saw things in a new way and told her story powerfully.

The errors mattered, I suppose, but the gist of her account was the ugly truth. If one master could not free slaves he promised to free because of a change in the law . . . and she fails to mention the fact. . . only a slaver will view that as of major ethical significance.

Planned Parenthood and the White House are missing the force of the video of an executive dealing in body parts. It is sickening and picking on the group involved is just the genetic fallacy. We can suppose the group is biased. Suppose they too are bad. It is Planned Parenthood that hires a doctor to harvest organs from babies that are being crushed.

Selling, or “donating,”  a human heart ripped from a “fetus” suggests that a fetus is a human. This is the reason that almost all Americans do not like abortion and think it is wrong. They may wish it legal, but there is a reason almost all politicians in both parties are either pro-life or pro-choice. Almost nobody is pro-abortion. Why? One ends up with candid interviews like the unedited video where a doctor chats up her client with a discussion of death over red wine.

I do not like the way the story was edited for release and I think the claims are sensationalized. This is bad, but has always been a tendency in advocacy (and one I hope this group avoids in the future). Many pro-life leaders such as Robbie George oppose the deception involved in “sting” operations on principle and I am sympathetic, though unpersuaded by such arguments.

One defense of Planned Parenthood is the “medical procedures” are always gross line. “After all,” we are told, “even live birth can sound gross to a layman.” And so it might, but nobody during a live birth ever crushes a head in order to get a liver: ever. I have been to four live births and one birth that ended in death . . . and the procedure was messy but life affirming. The doctors were “doing no harm” even when bad things happened.

One advantage of this defense is that it focusses on “science” as if “science” were being questioned. This allows the philosophically challenged defender to gain a sense of intellectual superiority while totally missing the point. Nobody disputes the science of abortion. Sane humans dispute the ethics of the act. It can be done, crushing heads and harvesting livers, but should it be done?

In normal (non-abortion) organ donation, the donor gives consent: an unborn child is not asked if her liver can be used for research. Leaving aside the humanity of the fetus, the donor in an abortion has not had the time to consider the decision the way regular organ donation is done.

Is the woman told that the procedure will change based on the body part that is desired? Is she told what her doctor will do to get the liver he desires?

Mawkish anti-slavery accounts were mocked in the South for their sentimentalization of freed slaves, womanhood, and liberty. Some abolitionists simplified stories in ways that pushed the borders of fiction for the sake of the noble cause of abolition. Pro-lifers have done the same at times . . . but forget the edited video. Watch the entire feed.

Watch and realize that whatever the merits of the men and women who gathered the video, they are filming a lunch to discuss harvesting the organs of an unborn child, performing an abortion in a manner to preserve those organs, and selling them. Is there a profit? Assume there is not. Some slavers argued they lost money in their benevolence toward their slaves. The horror was the cruel reality of slavery, the whipped backs, and the horror of this video is sipping the red wine while chatting up the ease with which one can crush a baby’s head to preserve her liver for research.

Justice!

 

Culture

Previous Post



July 16, 2015

Stop Talking about "Young People"

Next Post



July 18, 2015 The Wonder of It All: Paul and Plato


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am a small member of the body, yet I boast great things. I am a fire, a world of iniquity. What am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The eye The tongue The heart The hand

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »

Related posts from Eidos

Evangelical

Yet I Love Her: History and the Church

Eidos

Evangelical

Vain Repetition

Eidos

Evangelical

The Iceberg is There: Verbosity Cannot Defeat Reality

Eidos

Evangelical

Silence and Jollification

Eidos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube