Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

eidos

Unfit for Office, Secretary Clinton

Last updated on: May 13, 2015 at 11:06 am   by John Mark N. Reynolds

Unfit for Office, Secretary Clinton 2015-05-13T11:06:42-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Abraham Lincoln helped my family secede from Virginia when Virginia seceded from the Union. West Virginia was born and the Reynolds family does not look too often at the party of disunion for a presidential candidate, but it is always nice when the Democratic Party nominates someone who is worth serious thought. The Republic needs two plausible parties and just as it would be a shame if the Republicans nominated a loon (looking at you Donald Trump) so we can hope that the Democrats give us a candidate worth a thinking person’s support.

Unit for the White House

Unfit for the White House

Hillary Clinton is not that candidate. She is smart, hard working, and by all accounts inspires loyalty in the people who work for her cause. She is also unfit for the White House with little relevant executive experience, temperament, and character. She has the temperament of Richard Nixon combined with the ethics of Warren G. Harding, and the relevant experience of William Jennings Bryan.

Clinton is remarkably unqualified for an executive role. She was an active First Lady, but that job no more qualifies her for the White House than being married to a nurse and knowing their way around the hospital would make a person fit to give out medications.  Her political activity at the time was generally disastrous (Hillary Care) when it was not tone deaf (“baking cookies”). As a senator (a job she won because of her husband) from a safe state (New York), she did nothing memorable except to fit in nicely with the crony system of Washington. She made few waves and less legislation. All of this was a tune up for an inept run for the White House where she lost to Obama when she had everything going for her but the ability to manage a campaign competently.

Obama saved her political career by making her Secretary of State where she traveled a great deal and accomplished not much (if you are a Democrat) or was a disaster (if you are Republican). Don’t look for a Clinton doctrine or major peace treaty. About all  you can say in her defense is that she was better than John Kerry has been as Secretary of State. This is praising her with faint damns and if you liked the Obama foreign policy, then get ready for more of the same without President Obama’s moral rectitude: corrupt incompetence.

All of this has given her a lock on the Democratic nomination unequaled by a non-incumbant since Dwight Eisenhower had both parties court the General for office. Eisenhower had managed Victory in Europe in World War II and been President of Columbia. He was so well liked “I like Ike” could be a campaign slogan . . .something the polarizing Clinton will never manage.

Clinton lacks the temperament for the “head of state” part of the job. She has always survived as a divider and not as a uniter unless you count her “run” (much more like a stroll)  for the New York Senate . . . where she is somewhat to the right of the general electorate. Her husband never got a majority of the popular vote (Obama did twice) and Hillary lacks his slickster skills. When she needed to do so, she used standard slanders on women to keep her husband in office. If she wins, she will be the first woman in the White House through enabling the abuse of other women in the White House.

Warren G. Harding roots for Clinton to win because she would give the old fraud a run for his stolen money as the most corrupt occupant of the White House the day she won. Both Clintons have gotten rich in service to their country and frequently in ways that stink of graft and kickbacks. Whether she is getting insider trading deals or using the family foundation to hit up rich totalitarians for cash, Hillary Clinton has done well by doing badly in office. Is there any insider they do not owe a favor?

Clinton has demonstrated that she is the worst of two possible political worlds: the leftist willing to betray her causes for money and power. Friends of my mother witnessed her ruthless anti-family machinations early in her career during a UN Family Conference when it would cost her nothing, but with her husband she has always hidden her true views behind what pollsters tell her the traffic will stand. She was against gay marriage (though she was for it) until she was for gay marriage when polls told her it was safe to express her true views. Of this we can be sure, the one unhidden, unvarying, principle of the Clinton dynasty is that the Clintons will enrich themselves regardless of the cost to the nation or their Party. If Scott Walker gave his life to politics and owes Sears a great deal of money, my bet is that the Clintons owe the directors of Sears a great many favors.

The problem is not so much that she is very liberal, but that she is only liberal when the Givers of Goodies allow her to be so. The givers of Goodies have included her famously misogynistic husband who became President because she enabled his abuse of women over whom he had power. I do not believe, so help me God, I would vote for a Clinton if I agreed with Hillary Clinton on every issue.

She is an idealogue, but her ideology is foremost serving the world, the flesh, and those personal Clinton devils.

Finally, there is the issue of dynastic politics in a Republic. We have survived the Adams, the Bushes, and we would survive the Clintons, but surely it is not a good sign that in the youth of old age I have only been able to vote once in a Presidential election that did not feature a Bush or a Clinton. In this vast land, surely the nation’s oldest political party could find one pro-life Scoop Jackson Democrat to run for office.

Please?

Hillary Clinton is a woman running for the White House and that is worth one cheer. It is not worth the keys to the Republic and she will never get my vote.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post



May 12, 2015

I don't underestimate you, Dr. Carson, I am Just Not Voting For You

Next Post



May 14, 2015 Caesar Isn't Even That Important


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus say about worrying about tomorrow?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Do not worry Worry every day Plan for every detail Ignore today

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »

Related posts from Eidos

Evangelical

Classical Education and the Art of Dying Well

Eidos

Evangelical

Golden, Golden, Golden: My Mother's Last Lesson

Eidos

Evangelical

The Old Words Are Helpful

Eidos

Evangelical

When the Center Holds: A Tribute to My...

Eidos

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube