Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Handicapping 2016

Handicapping 2016

Last updated on: May 6, 2014 at 8:19 pm by John Mark N. Reynolds

Handicapping 2016 2014-05-06T20:19:50-04:00 John Mark N. Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My track record at picking Presidential winners is mixed: Obama 2008 was correct, Romney 2012 was not right. I do better at GOP party nominees. After two Democratic terms, 2016 is a mildly Republican year (as I thought 2012 was), but as 2012 proves candidates and strategy matter. Romney proved for my lifetime that the GOP must nominate a candidate who relates to working class people to win.

Democratic Nomination:

The Democrats are in disarray, led by a mildly unpopular President, with a shallow bench, but they have one great hope, one perfect candidate. If people are tired of Obama, no voter thinks Clinton is Obama. In fact, they think Mrs. Clinton is Mr. Clinton and as the years pass Mr. Clinton’s years are recalled fondly by a certain generation of swing voters. These voters were not thrilled with Obama, but they are younger than the “Joanies” (voters who remember Joanie Loves ChaChi), a demographic formed by growing up under Reagan.

Clinton would be the favorite if she runs and gets the nomination, because she has proven appeal to voters that do not like Obama. She can keep the base with the narrative of “first woman in the White House.” The Clintons, true or false, are perceived as moderate Democrats as compared to President Obama.

The problem for Clinton will be the primaries. She can be flanked to the left, but it does not appear any plausible “Obama type” is getting ready to run. Warren of Massachusetts could beat her in the primaries, but would get swamped in the general. There is a severe danger for the Democratic Party if Clinton does not run: their failure at the gubernatorial level means the fall backs plans center in blue state governors (eg Cuomo) with limited national appeal.

If Clinton does not run, the Democratic Party will lose. If she runs, they are narrow favorites.

Republican Nomination:

The Republican bench is much better than the 2012 disaster. I have chosen to limit the field to the “top eight” as I do not think there is money or time to support more candidates. The field is strong enough that fringe candidates will be squeezed out.

Top Three:

Religious Right: Mike Huckabee.

If he runs, then Huckabee should win Iowa, South Carolina, and the test will be Florida. He was a two term governor, charming communicator, but has a weight problem. He also turns off the “big business” and libertarian wings of the party.

Tea Party/Libertarians: Rand Paul.

Rand Paul is an intriguing candidate. He is a mildly new direction in foreign policy. He is a bad communicator beyond the base.

Establishment: Jeb Bush.

Christie is too damaged and too heavy (take note Huckabee) to run. He lacks the temper. Bush is a full spectrum conservative who would be the best candidate if not named Bush. Is his name fatal? The establishment choice almost always wins, but Huckabee is no Pat Robertson. A Huckabee/Bush race down the stretch would have Huckabee winning states that the GOP will win in the fall and Bush states that the GOP will not win.

If he runs, Bush is a slight favorite ($) for the nomination. He would lose to Clinton.

GOP Second Tier:

Religious Right: Senator Santorum or Governor Jindal.

Santorum will never raise the money to be the nominee.

Governor Jindal is a great candidate with some communication issues. Can he give a good stump speech? Can he fire up the base? If Huckabee bows out, then Jindal is the best hope of the religious right to capture the nomination and the White House. Jindal turns off no wing of the party and has a great story.He is a better general election candidate than anyone but Walker.

Tea Party/Libertarian: Ted Cruz

Cruz is a better candidate than Paul for unifying the Party after the nomination. He has a little experience and a prickly temperament. He is the smartest person running on the GOP side. If he knows it and shows it, he will fail in the nomination. He feels like a Goldwater candidate, in my heart I will know he is right, but he will lose the general to Clinton. If there is any other Democratic nominee, then Cruz as the nominee might be transformational. He could beat any other Democratic candidate, though the race would be closer than it needs to be, and Cruz would do things.

Establishment: Scott Walker or Susan Martinez

Walker is my personal favorite for the nomination. If nominated, he would give HRC the best race with his authentic blue collar story. He would, however, solidify her base for HRC better than any other candidate.

Martinez is having troubles as governor, but I think she is also an attractive candidate who could win.

Outsiders: Rubio, Ryan, or Romney

Rubio has time and he will take a pass on the race to stay in the Senate.

Ryan’s time has passed, but he will be Speaker of the House soon and will never be President.

Romney is a good man. I worked for his nomination for six years, but he proved he cannot carry blue collar workers. He will not be the nominee.

Bottom Line:

If the race were today, it would be Bush versus Clinton or Huckabee versus Clinton. Both would lose badly in the electoral college with 48% of the vote. Huckabee has greater upside if he could get the money to run a good campaign. Scott Walker has the best chance of winning a race with his blue collar credentials. Walker has shown he knows how to fight. HRC has little experience running against an inspirational, well funded, fighter.

This is HRC race to lose, but she is good at losing races.

Spiritual Reflections

Previous Post

May 1, 2014

Do you love me?

Next Post

May 7, 2014 Good-bye "Psych," Good Luck Castle

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Apologetics Art Culture Education On Books On Education Philosophy Politics Pop Culture Spiritual Reflections Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 July 2025 June 2025 September 2024 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 June 2023 September 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Here am I! Send me"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaiah Ezekiel Moses Jeremiah

Books by This Author John Mark Reynolds

See All Titles »