Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Eastern Catholic Person

To be received as Eastern Catholic in Richmond, to be among the Lord’s inheritance (Sunday Before the Exaltation of the Cross)

Last updated on: September 9, 2018 at 10:03 am   by Justin Tse

To be received as Eastern Catholic in Richmond, to be among the Lord’s inheritance (Sunday Before the Exaltation of the Cross) 2018-09-09T10:03:37-07:00 Justin Tse

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My reception two years ago – photo by my wife

On this Sunday Before the Exaltation of the Cross, our temple in Richmond will receive our sixth person this year into our Eastern Catholic church. The first was the baptism of a Japanese Canadian guy who was getting married to someone who was already Eastern Catholic. The next two came in June; those were a Cantonese couple whose way into our church had been similar to mine insofar as they were moved by our support of Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement in 2014. In August, we received by ascription a man from Japan who had been part of the Latin Church, and we baptized his son too. Today, we will chrismate a woman from China.

We are a temple in the Kyivan Church. As these people who have become dear friends enter this church, I am reminded of that feeling I had at my chrismation two years ago. I had come home, I felt, but it had not altered my ethnicity because I never felt that I was joining an ethnic church. Of course some people tried to warn me when I was doing so that Greek Catholicism can be a smattering of ethnic strongholds, and during my mystagogy – which was after my chrismation – I did get a front row seat to some of that when I struggled to find my place among the only Eastern Catholics that I knew in Chicago, Ukrainian Americans. It was from this struggle that the informal group known as the Kyivan Psychoanalysis Study Group was formed. The great thing about that group is that we are also not all ethnic Ukrainians; if anything, we are a broad-based anti-racist collective.

But at my chrismation in Richmond, I did not feel any of that difficulty. In fact, my biological father, an Anglican priest, read Psalm 66 in Cantonese as I was being led on my spiritual father’s epitrakhil into the sanctuary. When we received our Japanese friends into our church, we changed all the Lord, have mercy responses to Shu, awaremeyo, and we also learned the Trisagion in Japanese too. We usually have enough Mandarin and Cantonese in a regular Sunday liturgy for people to suspect that we are indeed the famous ‘Chinese mission’ that the joke character Michael Schurr asked the Canadian Ambassador to Ukraine about on the Ukrainian satire show Toronto Television. The thing, though, is that we are not a Chinese mission. We are a neighbourhood church in Richmond, and as our reception record shows, truly, everyone is welcome, and if you hang out with us, we will try to speak your language too.

The popular tagline in the Greek-Catholic Church of Kyiv is that we are not a church for Ukrainians, but a church from Ukraine for the world. Whether or not we are always good at living up to this motto is another story, but if my experience, which is corroborated now by my friends who are freshly into their mystagogy (as well as more people coming through our catechumenate pipeline, for that matter), is anything to go by, it’s that this church demands that you become the truest person that you actually are. Everyone has a role in the liturgy, and for things to run smoothly, there’s very little room for second-guessing. Like blogging, the lightning-fast pace of our liturgical drama requires the body to lead the mind, not the other way around. You learn quickly what you are good at and what you have no capacity to improve on: singing, reading, serving, cantoring, listening, praying, organizing, cooking, writing, and so on. You can only do that in which you are competent, and when you are working from muscle memory most of the time, your truest self is exposed, with no lag time for edits.

Everything else is economia, the whole house with all of one’s sisters and brothers in the temple managing it together. Two days ago, our kleros in Richmond – the group of singers who lead the congregational singing – found ourselves confused by the rubrics for today’s chrismation. We had thought that it was a straightforward Divine Liturgy, perhaps with some added treats from the postfeast of the Nativity of the Theotokos, and proceeding with our assumptions, we prepared. But as we looked more deeply into it, we found that there was only one prokeimen in the Liturgy of the Catechumens – the psalm verse preceding the reading of the Apostol – and it did not correspond to any of the tones for either the Sunday or the postfeast. It took a few minutes for us to clue in that it was actually the Sunday Before the Exaltation, so after the Little Entrance, everything switches over to anticipate that Feast. Go team, I thought, when we figured it out.

That prokeimen, incidentally, encapsulates what I’m trying to describe here: Save your people, O Lord, and bless your inheritance. My friend Julian Hayda tells me that that word inheritance is a tricky translation from the Slavonic. It’s not about the passing down of material assets or even a kind of legacy or heritage. Like the Anglicans who also use the word if they are in the habit of using the Book of Common Prayer, the inheritance is the people who bear the name of the Lord, and it is especially poignant as we anticipate the Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross that we remember that that name is tied to the sign of the cross. Unto you I will cry, O Lord, the prokeimen continues, lest you turn from me in silence. The image that this verse invokes is our crucified Lord crying out to the Father. We bear his name. We are crucified with him.

We should not lose sight of the irony of these reflections. Make no mistake: the Exaltation of the Holy Cross was an imperial act in Byzantium. Not only does it celebrate the Emperor Constantine’s mother Helena having found the relics of the True Cross in her pilgrimage to Palestine, but it also commemorates the victory of Constantinople against the Persians in contest over the possession of the wood of the Cross. It was the people of the imperial city who gathered under the exalted cross. They had, after all, conquered in this sign. In hoc signo vinces, it had been revealed to Constantine. The cross was the sign of symphonia between imperium and sacerdotium.

But Byzantium has fallen, and in its place have many claims to empire been made. The modern equivalence between the imperialism of old and the contemporary nation-state has been especially problematic, in the sense of it generating new problems for which solutions are difficult to discern. This week, the Orthodox world has been thrown into confusion by the Ecumenical Patriarchate confirming that it plans to give the Church of Kyiv autocephaly. I have long been supportive of this move, but I recognize the problems that it confers as well. The accusations will be made that all that this is doing is granting legitimacy to yet another national church. A more thorough understanding of history, however, will demonstrate that this accusation doesn’t take into account the full picture, which is that Kyiv has always been considered the canonical territory of Constantinople, not Moscow, and that not granting Kyiv autocephaly after all she’s been through would be tantamount to legitimizing Moscow’s claims as a national church to erase political borders and expand its state’s national boundaries with little limit.

However, the point that I am trying to make is even further than this one, and it is that the Kyivan Church is Catholic. Currently, the church of us Greek Catholics is one of the four ways that the children of the Holy Equals-to-the-Apostles Volodymyr and Olha are split, but as our Patriarch has made clear, it is our hope that we will be reconciled with our sisters and brothers who share the same spiritual inheritance. But all the other persons that I’ve described coming into our church in Richmond, including me, are part of this people too. Spiritually speaking, we too are Prince Volodymyr and Princess Olha’s spiritual children, and we are not ethnic Ukrainians. Our belonging together demonstrates that our church is truly Catholic because it is not an ethnic church because a church based on ethnicity is not a church, as the Synod of Constantinople declared in 1872 when it condemned ethnophyletism, the ecclesial racism that links ethnonationalism to a church.

Our church, like our sister church in Rome and our mother church in Constantinople, is Catholic because Christ is among us. Indeed, as the Holy Hieromartyr Ignatius of Antioch wrote to the Church of Smyrna, where Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. The Lord is present, he reminds us in the Feast that we anticipate, in what the Holy Apostle Paul called the word of the cross, describing the Apostle’s resolve to know nothing, as he tells the Corinthians, but Jesus Christ and him crucified. As the Lord tells his audience in the holy Gospel according to St John the Theologian, it is by being lifted up that he draws all people to himself, and the Theologian comments that by this, he indicated the kind of death that he would die. The holy cross is our salvation because it breaks down the barriers among the nations and calls all people to share in the risen life of the one who was crucified. To be marked with the sign of the cross means that our church is in itself universal, gathering people irrespective of ethnicity in our liturgical worship. We are not an ethnic church because we are Catholic.

Perhaps one way of describing the redemptive process in our tradition is that it is as if we were defaced icons now being restored. With the image of Christ shining through our bodies, we become more ourselves as we pray. Our false consciousness is negated by the cross by whose sign we are marked, and we understand ourselves to be the Lord’s inheritance, the people that he has saved. In the cross, in the cross, we might dare to sing with the evangelicals, be my glory ever, till my raptured soul shall find rest beyond the river.

Eastern Christianity

anti-racism

autocephaly

Byzantium

Cantonese

Constantinople

cross

Exaltation of the Cross

Holy Cross

inheritance

Japanese

Julian Hayda

Kyiv

Kyivan Church

Nativity of the Theotokos

Richmond

Umbrella Movement

Previous Post



September 8, 2018

My wife is not 'my Virgin Mary' (Nativity of the Theotokos)

Next Post



September 9, 2018 Chinese Christianity is about heart: reflections on Faith's chrismation


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglican Communion anti-racism Aristotle Asia-Pacific Asian American Asian Canadian BlackLivesMatter Cantonese Catholic China Chinglican church politics Church-State Politics Civil Society Conservative Eastern Christianity Evangelical Evangelical Left Feminist/Womanist Theology Food Greek-Catholic Church of Kyiv Hong Kong Housekeeping Kyivan Church Latin Catholicism Law Liberal Liberation Theology New Calvinism Pentecostal/Charismatic Protestant Psychoanalysis Publics Religion Ethnicity Wired Secular Sovereignty TPCIU Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 December 2014 November 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many people boarded the ark with Noah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Two Ten Twelve Eight

Related posts from Eastern Catholic Person

Catholic

I've found my way home: on the unraveling...

Eastern Catholic Person

Catholic

This time, I have a tradition: on solidarity...

Eastern Catholic Person

Catholic

Home is where your food is: a speech...

Eastern Catholic Person

Catholic

Patriyarkhat: 'Attending to the movements of my heart'

Eastern Catholic Person

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Halloween, Tolkien, And The Victory of Grace

If I had to choose a favorite month of the year, it...

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube