Quick Wins

Last updated on: July 27, 2016 at 3:10 pm by Justin Tse

Quick Wins 2016-07-27T15:10:11-07:00 Justin Tse

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Liberal Party of British Columbia is reeling over a leak of an internal strategic document. Titled the “Multicultural Strategic Plan,” it attempts to detail how the BC Liberal Government should reach out to ethnic minority voters, especially Chinese Canadians, who allegedly and reportedly feel “ignored by government between elections” (p. 2).

Since everyone has seen it, you should see it too.

The plan details ways to win “ethnic communities”–which seems really to be code for “Chinese Canadian people” (see p. 2, although there is stuff in there about Punjabi communities too)–to the BC Liberal side, especially for the election on May 14, 2013. The Liberals are particularly aware that they are not doing well among Chinese populations because of the severe backlash they faced when they pushed a 12% Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) through the Legislative Assembly in 2010. The backlash from all sides got so bad that the premier at the time, Gordon Campbell, resigned. [Just to get everyone up to speed: the BC Liberals are a centrist party that combines people from the right and the left. The party on the left is the New Democratic Party (the NDP). To give you a sense of how confusing things got, the NDP–the party on the left–opposed this form of tax revenue pushed by the Liberals.]

The plan’s approach is to re-engage ethnic media on the Liberals’ terms and to look for “quick wins.” It argues that the Liberals need to find spokespeople who can speak “ethnic” languages so as to directly target the “ethnic media” with their message (like the NDP’s Gabriel Yiu), as well as to build an “ethnic database” and to find “validators” from within ethnic communities to write letters to editors and defend the Liberals from attacks from within “ethnic media.” It also calls for “quick win” solutions, particularly by identifying historic wrongs and then apologizing for them. The example in the document is the Komagatu Maru incident in 1914, in which a Japanese steamship carrying passengers from India was denied entry into Vancouver because of anti-Indian exclusion.

As you might imagine, there has been a good deal of Chinese Canadian backlash toward the leaked document. I’m on the look-out for Punjabi pushback too. In recent Canadian news (the Province, the CBC, the Globe and Mail, Global BC, and the Georgia Straight), there has been a great deal of outcry at tax dollars being spent on the Liberal election machinery, leading to a series of Liberal resignations, including Premier Christy Clark’s deputy chief of staff. As far as Chinese Canadians are concerned, Bill Chu from the Canadians for Reconciliation Society has said that the document demonstrates the insincerity of the government in its apologies for historic wrongs. So too, Victor Wong at the Chinese Canadian National Council has voiced his disappointment over the instrumentalization of Chinese Canadians for the Liberal vote.

But for these uses of ethnicity to wire us like coffee, there are some further questions we should ask:

Where is the line between a political regime sincerely apologizing for historic wrongs toward racialized and ethnic minorities as opposed to instrumentalizing them for political gain?
What is it about targeting the “ethnic vote” and building an “ethnic database” that is so sensitive?
Is there continuity between an past of racist exclusion and a present of multiculturalism?
What might the pushback and the resignations suggest about prospects for justice?

Allow me to suggest some of my own answers. There is a long history of anti-Chinese and anti-Japanese exclusion in British Columbia. As historian Patricia Roy documents it in her three-volume historical set (A White Man’s Province, The Oriental Question, and The Triumph of Citizenship), Chinese and Japanese people have been historic pawns for white politicians to score political points. While some might argue that the era of exclusion has passed, this sort of “ethnic targeting” rhetoric suggests that in fact little has changed, that British Columbia remains a “white man’s province” in which ethnic communities remain pawns for power. That is precisely the point about multiculturalism that has been made by scholars in critical race studies: that it doesn’t address legacies of white supremacy and makes sure you don’t talk about it because why would you want to say something about that when we could all just be nice, equal, and living together in a constructed harmony? One might see the document, itself titled a “multicultural strategic plan,” as the smoking gun.

This blog is about religion and ethnicity. I can’t think of a better post with which to begin the caffeinated conversation on ethnicity and its equally complicated cousin, race.

UPDATE (3 March): here is an Indo-Canadian statement.
UPDATE (4 March): Christy Clark’s cabinet backs her.

Asian Canadian

Civil Society

Religion Ethnicity Wired

BC Liberals

Bill Chu

Canadian multiculturalism

multicultural strategic plan

multiculturalism

Patricia Roy

Victor Wong

Previous Post

March 1, 2013

Friend of the Court

Next Post

March 13, 2013 Francis, Bishop of Rome

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Anglican Communion anti-racism Aristotle Asia-Pacific Asian American Asian Canadian BlackLivesMatter Cantonese Catholic China Chinglican church politics Church-State Politics Civil Society Conservative Eastern Christianity Evangelical Evangelical Left Feminist/Womanist Theology Food Greek-Catholic Church of Kyiv Hong Kong Housekeeping Kyivan Church Latin Catholicism Law Liberal Liberation Theology New Calvinism Pentecostal/Charismatic Protestant Psychoanalysis Publics Religion Ethnicity Wired Secular Sovereignty TPCIU Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 August 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 December 2014 November 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz