Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

earlychristianhistorymatters

Christian Nationalism: Political Tool And Biased Reporting

Last updated on: April 6, 2026 at 12:24 pm   by Al Baker

0 Comments

Christian Nationalism: Political Tool And Biased Reporting 2026-04-06T12:24:34-05:00 Al Baker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Christian Nationalism – An Artificial Category to Label MAGA Supporters

PRRI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan org for independent researchCould “Christian Nationalism” [CN from this point forward] actually be a category and a convenient tool for those who dislike President Trump? Some Christians are angry. They are  content to join the haters and to condemn both Trump and the Christians who support him.

When Did “Christian Nationalism” Become So Popular?

As I said in my opening article, I had not heard of CN until the past few months. I had a hunch that this term was a cudgel to beat Trump and MAGA with, so I decided to find out when this term started becoming popular.

The first thing I did was search for journal articles on the academic hub I use to find scholarly studies in various disciplines. A search for [“Christian Nationalism” Trump] in academic journals returned 3,656 results. As I scrolled down through the first two pages (50 articles) reading the abstracts or introduction comments, it was clear that the overwhelming majority of these articles were negatively slanted against President Trump. The 6-8 articles written prior to 2016 were focused outside the USA, mostly on South Africa.

So it appeared from academic journal articles that the term “Christian Nationalism” had become a popular term only more recently and has been used for the last 10 years to attack Trump.
I asked Google AI when this term became popular. This was the returned answer:

“While the ideology of Christian nationalism has deep roots in U.S. history, the term itself became prominent and common in public discourse primarily after the 2020 election and January 6th Capitol riot (2021), exploding in mainstream use as scholars and media sought frameworks to explain rising political extremism, especially following the Trump presidency (starting in 2016). Its usage surged in books, news, and surveys from around 2020-2022, driven by concerns over anti-democratic impulses and threats to religious freedom.”

Just as I had thought.
The Vexed Vicar, a conservative English pastor who stands up for the gospel.I will give more evidence in this article to show that these “research” organizations are biased.

This Christian pastor in  England (“The Vexed Vicar”) has a non-American view of “Christian Nationalism” and is very clear about what the Western world is facing. I encourage you to listen to what he says about the UK…then apply it to the USA.

So, What About Bias?

CNN Report on White Christian Nationalism

Image: CNN Report on “The biggest myth about White Christian nationalism”

The CNN article, “The biggest myth about White Christian Nationalism,” is interesting. First, they open with the photo (on left) of Patriot Front (PF moving forward). This is my first time to hear about this group by name. THIS was the “racist” group in Charlottesville and they certainly smack of “White Nationalism.” I have my doubts about calling them “Christian” because their stance on race is very problematic. Yet, many articles on CN like to pump the racist mantra…and couple PF with MAGA supporters.
Why do they do this? Because they are biased.

 

Back to PRRI

In the previous article I introduced PRRI. (Public Religion Research Institute) “is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization in the U.S. that conducts independent research at the intersection of religion, culture, and public policy.”
That sounds really good, but as with most media in our post-modern, 10 second attention span and algorithm driven feeds…you need to read the fine print:

Focus Areas for PRRI: Studies commonly cover topics such as political polarization, religious demographics, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, climate change, and social inequality.

That does not sound “nonpartisan.” But, you ask “How do YOU know that?”  I looked closely at 3-4 of their reports. Their 2-3 studies on CN are biased against President Trump and MAGA supporters. The studies of PRRI are always slanted LEFT. Why?  Because their sponsors are clearly biased. I asked Google AI a simple question about PRRI sponsors. My simple question: “What kind of projects does “Name of the Organization” focus on? These were the responses, shortened to vital aspects of the Google answers:

The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation: “its mission to prioritize social justice”
Their site lists immigration as a current focal point. Hmm. Mellon recently gave a $1 million grant to  PRRI.”

Henry Luce Foundation: “…race, justice and religion…underrepresented artists…close the gender gap”

Open Society Foundations (OSF):  “…founded by George Soros…justice, equity, and democratic practice (And the American Way!…oh sorry, it did not say that).”

Carnegie Corporation of New York:  “Political Polarization (2024–2026), the foundation supports projects that intersect with the themes often associated with Christian nationalism…”

Arcus Foundation: “LGBTQ social justice…uplifting pro-LGBTQ religious voices to counter antagonistic narratives within traditional denominations.”

No need to continue. PRRI is funded by many Left or “Progressive” foundations. Their claims of “nonpartisan” and conducting “independent research” are bogus. This explains why their handling of CN is so biased.

Summary and Conclusions Thus Far

This ends my third post on this slippery topic. Here are the major points I would like the reader to grapple with:

  1. There is not a solid definition of “Christian Nationalism” that is agreed upon by MOST sectors of our society.
  2. This makes the topic vague and unclear.
  3. The organizations offering survey work and research reports openly state that the public has “widely varying ideas” on the main points of the topic.
  4. Most of the media coverage AND “research” is biased.

In my next article I will offer some comments from Kelly Baker, Ph.D. She was the scholar behind the above CNN article on White Nationalism and Patriot Front. Although at times she presents historical data cloaked in a progressive mindset, she does present a nuanced view that I appreciated.

Evangelical

Christian Nationalism

Previous Post



February 28, 2026

There is no Clear Definition for "Christian Nationalism"

Next Post



August 14, 2026 The SPLC Indictment and the "Christian Nationalist" Label

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I appreciate your comment, however I did acknowledge MOST of what you addressed...just from a ..."

Al Baker


What the New Testament Says About ..."

"Here's the problem. Americans do not have rulers. Elected officials are public servants. We do ..."

EarthGrowl


What the New Testament Says About ..."

"Sorry, Karen. We actually have free speech on this venue.You do not have to read ..."

Al Baker


Why a Christian SHOULD Vote for ..."

"1. I have learned many things in the last two years. I am a professor ..."

Al Baker


Why a Christian SHOULD Vote for ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Christian Nationalism Early Christian History Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 April 2026 February 2026 January 2026 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

We made a deceptive treaty with Israel by pretending to come from a distant land with moldy bread and worn-out wineskins. Who are we?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Gibeonites The Canaanites The Hivites The Amorites

Related posts from Early Christian History Matters, Why?

Family

The SPLC Indictment and the "Christian Nationalist" Label

Early Christian History Matters, Why?

Family

There is no Clear Definition for "Christian Nationalism"

Early Christian History Matters, Why?

Family

The Early Church Fathers on Prayers for Government...

Early Christian History Matters, Why?

Family

What the New Testament Says About Obeying Rulers

Early Christian History Matters, Why?

TRENDING AT PATHEOS History and Religion

Michele's Reviews - Get to Work by Jonny...

  Get to Work: Seeing Your Daily Grind as God’s Good Gift...

I Used to be Small

My Journey from Faith to Wholeness by Karl Forehand For those leaving...

Chapter 1, Sarah: The Impossible Choice

Open and Relational Theology & Social Psychology About this series: This series...

Political Gain from Personal Pain is Ungodly

By now, the story has reached the far edges of the internet:...

When Forgiveness Meets Real Life

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College A...

Calvinism’s Achilles Heel

Actually, I believe traditional, classical Calvinism has several “Achilles Heels.” Here I...

view all History and Religion blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube