Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christian Podcast Central

Parent Like You Mean It: Roe vs The Constitution

Last updated on: June 28, 2022 at 11:09 am   by Christian Podcast Central

Parent Like You Mean It: Roe vs The Constitution 2022-06-28T11:09:11-08:00 Christian Podcast Central

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Roe vs. The Constitution

Today, we’re ditching the safety nets & discussing decision making – both at home and at the Supreme Court! 

Roe vs. The ConstitutionWe start by looking at a decision making tool based on the North Star, introducing questions, goals and boundaries that restrict the options for any decision. Then we draw the parallel to how the SCOTUS made is landmark decision regarding abortion in the Dobbs case. It all, essentially, boils down to a lesson learned in Saturday Morning Cartoons – the Schoolhouse Rock song about the three-ring-circus that is our federal government system. If a ruling is brought before the SCOTUS, their single job is to determine if it is Constitutional or not. If it is not (as is the case with Roe v Wade), then the option for those who insist on making it the “law of the land” is to either amend the Constitution or pass a law through the legal system that falls within the Constitution’s standards.

It’s really not that complicated.

Now, I know that  none of you, nor our news broadcasts, give a care at all about where or if my

son goes to college. But, I also know that many of you may be dealing with this; or you will be dealing with this sometime. Or maybe you have dealt with this. But, our family, over the last couple of years have gone through this decision-making process of “if or where my oldest son should go to college”. And we are faced with the dilemma of how to best make these decisions.

Now, I had a mentor a number of years ago and he laid out a decision-making tree that was different, and more simple, than many others that I’ve seen. It’s called “The North Star Decision Making Process”, and it consists of a figurative north star that guides and directs our decision, or it’s the question that we’re seeking to answer. In this particular situation, this is the question, “If or where should my son go to college?”

Then we have some boundaries basically that help create our path to this decision and inside of these boundaries are viable options, such as my son says: my son wants to go into a specific field that requires a college degree. So, his field of of study matches with his professional field that he wants to go into. And so, the fields lead to our north star. If we had a situation where he wanted to work as something that may not require a college degree, then that would change our boundaries. Now, if his career field track was the the only rule that we have to follow – if that were the only thing guiding our decision – then any university would fit within our north star process. However, that’s not the case.

The field that he wants to study often requires some very expensive universities – universities that I simply can’t afford. So, without significant financial aid, many schools fall outside of our boundaries. Then, my son said one of his personal preferences is that he wants to be near the

Beach (I have surfers for kids).

So, among the many, many other decision making factors, we have his field of study, his desire to be near the beach, and we have schools that we can afford. All of this allows for a whole broad list of universities that my son can choose from. But, it also nixes other opportunities or colleges that are outside of our boundaries.

This helped us make some decisions on where to apply, how to apply for financial aid and before you know it… VOILA! Dude’s going to a university right on the beach, studying what he wants to study.

Is this process easy? No. It took a lot of prayer, research, and then a lot of – honestly – divine

intervention when it came to financial aid and other deadlines.

But by going through this whole process, we are able to stand very confidently and when life gets rough – when the classes get hard, when finances look ridiculous – we can say, “We went through this process; and we could see where things are pointing; and we can feel confident that my son is at the right college.

I bring all of this up to discuss another story that HAS been in the news more than a little bit in the last few days – the decision that the Supreme Court had in front of them regarding Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. For those of you who don’t know, the Dobbs case brought into question Roe v. Wade and Casey v. Planned Parenthood, asking “Should abortion be a federal mandate across the country or should it be something that each State should regulate its own?”

Well we’ve got the North Star question: What should we do about Roe v Wade? And we’ve got

some boundaries that helped guide the SCOTUS’ decision. The single boundary that means more than anything is The Constitution. That’s the overarching boundary. That is what the Supreme Court really had to examine and base their decision on.

Now many people are saying, “But what about the fact that Roe v Wade has been the “law of the land” for the last nearly 50 years? What about the past decisions that have been based on Roe’s premise? We can’t just get rid of all that.”

Can’t we?

Well, what the Supreme Court looked at is was whether or not the Roe decision of 1973 was actually based on the Constitution. And therefore, everything else would trickle down from there. The SCOTUS determined: No. it wasn’t.

Roe was a bad decision. It was a bad decision in its original state. 

Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg, before she passed away, said that she wished there was a better way to defend abortion because Roe is on shaky ground.

Therefore, the SCOTUS said kicking it back to the states – just like it had been for most of America’s history is the right move. 

Does it make abortion illegal across the land? No, it does not. Does it make abortion “the law of the land”? Well, honestly it never was “the LAW of the land”.

And this brings me to something completely different. That is something that I learned as a little kid way back in the 1970s – that’s the three ring circus that is our Federal Government. In our “three-ring circus”, we have the Executive Branch, the Legislature and the Judiciary. The three of them have checks and balances. Each of them have separate but equal powers. Each of them have a role in our lives, as a nation. And then, any power that does not apply to these three branches goes to the state and local governments.

The reason why I said that Roe was never the “law of the land” was that it was a Supreme Court decision. Not a law.

A law can only be brought through the Legislature, then signed and executed by the Executive, then if it is brought before them, examined by the Judiciary to determine whether or not the law is Constitutional.

This is how our Constitution works.

When you’re hearing people scream about how terrible this moment is in our nation’s history, they are completely forgetting about this Schoolhouse Rock three-ring circus of how our Constitution is supposed to work. When we examine the different decisions that the Supreme Court is supposed to make, each one should abide by the Constitution in its current state.

The hard truth is is that there’s nothing in the Constitution that guarantees the right to an abortion. 

Now, there are certain rights that ARE specifically guaranteed by our Constitution and its amendments. And this is where I think people need to get things moving, if they are really as passionate as they seem to be. If they truly feel like abortion needs to be the law of the land, 

make it the law of the land. Go through the legislative process. Get it signed or passed through our legislature. Then get it sent up to the executive and have the President take care of it. Then it may get kicked to the judicial branch and they’ll determine if it fits within the Constitution. If it

does, it becomes the law of the land. Until then, just like the SCOTUS just did, it’s going to be kicked back to each of the individual states. And they get to make up their minds within each state regarding what to do with this dilemma and how to how to answer the North Star question of whether or not abortion should be allowed.

Is this example oversimplified? Yes, sure. But when you oversimplify things, it makes understanding certain things a whole lot easier – at least for my simple brain.

I’ve said it many many times when i look at what guides me in my life decisions. What I try to do is to keep in mind one Bible verse. Just one. And I ask, “All right, God, what do you want me to do? It’s a big world with a big load of decisions. What do you want me to do?” And then I remember Micah 6:8.

The Lord has told you what is good,

    and this is what He requires of you:

to do what is just, to love mercy,

    and to walk humbly with your God.

Now, I know that some of you are saying, “Oh, there you go with your Bible stuff. Christianity doesn’t have any place in our government, and we’re supposed to have a separation of Church and State…” Okay, then you take whatever principle it is that guides your life and apply it to your North Star process, knowing that we have our Constitution. We also have a three-ring circus; and let’s see what wins out.

But, for now, I simply say, STOP THROWING YOUR TEMPER TANTRUMS. 

And, instead, try out my method of living – just for a bit – loving mercy, living justly and walking humbly. And then maybe, just maybe, you might see some positive, life giving results.

I hope that this stirs up some healthy conversations – not screaming or yelling… not wailing nor going into false assumptions of what the Constitution says or what it doesn’t say. Nor what the law should be, or what you wish. Because all those things are outside of the North Star Boundaries. I don’t care what you want. I don’t care what history has been. The Justices didn’t care about any of these different things. It simply looked at what does the Constitution say and then within that, how does the decision-making process work.

Check out more Parent Like You Mean It videos on our YouTube Channel! And PLEASE SUBSCRIBE!

And, watch more entertaining and engaging videos from our incredible influencers videos here!

Check out more Parent Like You Mean It videos on our YouTube Channel! And PLEASE SUBSCRIBE!

And, watch more entertaining and engaging videos from our incredible influencers videos here!**

Parent Like You Mean It

14th Amendment

christian

christian podcast

Christian Podcast Central

constitution

Dobbs v Jackson

God

grace

jesus

justice

love

mercy

peace

Previous Post



June 24, 2022

Brad Stine Has Issues: How to Fricassee a Pharisee

Next Post



July 12, 2022 Parent Like You Mean It: Fight for their News!


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Brad Stine Has Issues Christian Podcast Central Classic Podcast Experience God Life Grounded Ouxano Parent Like You Mean It The Protest Show with Thor Ramsey The Summit Lecture Series Uncategorized What You’ve Been Searching For

Select a Month July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet had a vision of God standing beside a destroyed altar?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ezekiel Micah Joel Amos

Related posts from Christian Podcast Central

Evangelical

Parent Like You Mean It: Fight for their...

Christian Podcast Central

Evangelical

Brad Stine Has Issues: America - No Going...

Christian Podcast Central

Evangelical

Parent Like You Mean It: Whatchoo Talkin’ ‘Bout?...

Christian Podcast Central

Evangelical

Brad Stine Has Issues: How I’m Not Going...

Christian Podcast Central

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical - Sponsored

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical - Sponsored blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube