Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Christian Podcast Central

Home
Evangelical - Sponsored
I Don’t Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist, part 4 with Frank Turek

I Don’t Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist, part 4 with Frank Turek

Last updated on: February 3, 2015 at 1:56 pm by Christian Podcast Central

I Don’t Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist, part 4 with Frank Turek 2015-02-03T13:56:40-08:00 Christian Podcast Central

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

To purchase the entire DVD set of the Summit Lecture Series, vista summit.org.

Let’s start with the cosmological argument from the very beginning of the universe – this is the argument that many say points to the Big Bang. I just know who banged it! In fact, the evidence for the Big Bang is quite good. You even have atheists like Steven Hawking admitting that the universe and time itself had a beginning at the Big Bang. Now, Hawking tries to give another explanation for the origin of the universe other than God, but he is admitting that the universe: space matter and time, had a beginning. Another cosmologist named Alexander Vilenkin put it even more forcefully:

“With the proof now in place, cosmologists can no longer hide behind the possibility of a past-eternal universe. There is no escape: they have to face the problem of a cosmic beginning.”

Now, Vilenkin is a believer in the “multiverse” – a theory that there are several universes out there and we just happen to be in the one that appears designed. But, even Vilenkin admits that even if there are other universes out there, the whole show needs an absolute beginning. So you don’t get rid of the need for an absolute Beginner.

It’s interesting that he uses the word “proof”. It’s actually unusual for scientists to use this word in this context. Yet, he says that it is proven that space, time and matter had a beginning. And he says it’s a “problem”, particularly for cosmologists, because the implication for a beginning gets much too close to Genesis for their liking.

But, the idea that the universe had a beginning is so widely accepted, that it is no longer considered controversial. Even among atheists. What is controversial is what caused it. In fact, Robert Jastrow, an agnostic astronomer, wrote that while he was an agnostic on religious matters:

“Now we see how the astronomical evidence supports the biblical view of the origin of the world. The details differ, but he essential elements in the astronomical and biblical accounts of Genesis are the same.”

Jastrow went on to say:

“That there are what I or anyone would call supernatural forces at work is now, I think, a scientifically proven fact.”

Why would he say this? Why couldn’t nature have created the universe?

Nature actually had a beginning, therefore nature was the cause. Since it was the effect of something, then it can’t be the cause. You see, if space, matter, and time had a beginning, then the cause must transcend space, matter, and time. In other words, the cause must be spaceless, timeless, and immaterial.

Now, when you think of a spaceless, timeless, and immaterial cause, whom do you think of? That would be God.

Some may call this a “God of the Gaps” argument, where if you don’t have an answer for something, you plug God into the unknown gaps and later on figure out that there really was a natural explanation, and you look stupid for plugging God into the gap of your knowledge.

But it’s not.

They will argue that if you just give science enough time, a natural cause will be discovered. But a natural cause will never be discovered for all of nature. Primarily, since there is no evidence of this currently the supposition that given enough time, a cause will be figured out is merely faith. Secondly, a natural cause for all of nature will never be found because nature is the effect. It cannot, by definition be its own cause.

For more engaging and encouraging videos and podcasts, visit the E-Squared Media Network at www.e2medianetwork.com.

christian culture podcast

is the bible reliable

Summit Lecture Series

Previous Post

January 30, 2015

Meeting People Head On with Ray Schmautz 12: It’s Gotta Be The Shoes

Next Post

February 3, 2015 The Big Picture Podcast 62: The Mistake Social Justice Christians Make

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Brad Stine Has Issues Christian Podcast Central Classic Podcast Experience God Life Grounded Ouxano Parent Like You Mean It The Protest Show with Thor Ramsey The Summit Lecture Series Uncategorized What You’ve Been Searching For

Select a Month July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz