Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christian Podcast Central

The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism with JP Moreland, part 2

Last updated on: August 12, 2014 at 2:44 pm   by Christian Podcast Central

The Summit Lecture Series: Scientific Naturalism with JP Moreland, part 2 2014-08-12T14:44:43-08:00 Christian Podcast Central

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

To purchase the entire Summit Lecture Series, Vol. 1 on DVD, go to: summit.org

I was once invited to a dinner party where I was asked to give a presentation regarding truth, God and philosophy.  I was warned that there would be a gentleman attending who may cause me some problems.  Apparently, he had a Ph.D. in physics from Johns Hopkins, had been an engineer for 30 years, and really hated Christianity.

So, right after exchanging pleasantries, before the meeting, he launched into me:  “I understand you are a philosopher.  Well, philosophy and theology – I used to be interested in that kind of stuff when I was a teenager.  But when I grew up to a mature adult, I gave it up because I began to realize that if you can’t test and quantify your data and measure it in the lab, it’s nothing but a bunch of hot air.  And that’s what philosophy is.”

Now, that is somebody who accepts Scientism.

One problem with his statement is that moral, political, and theological assertions, as well as assertions in art and the like are simply non-cognitive.  They’re just emotional.

Another problem with his statement is that Empiricism and Scientism are self-refuting; and there are things that we can know that Empiricism and Scientism falsely imply we cannot know.

What did I mean be self-refuting?

One example of self-refutation includes the statement, “No sentence is longer than three words.”  This very sentence is seven words long, so it is self-refuting.

The problem with Empiricism is that its claim that “we can only know things that we can test with our five senses” cannot itself be proven or known by anything you can sense with your five senses.  It’s impossible to use your senses of sight, hearing, taste, touch, or smell to present any clue whatsoever as to whether or not Empiricism is correct.  Therefore, it’s self-refuting by its own standards.

The same thing holds true for Scientism.  The claim, “Only what can be tested scientifically can be known” is not itself testable scientifically.  In fact, scientism is not a statement of science.  It’s a statement of philosophy about science.

A true statement of science would be something like: “Water is H20”, “Magnetic fields oscillate back and forth with electrical fields”, or “The world’s continents shift because they rest upon plates.”

These are scientific assertions.  Whether they are true or false doesn’t matter in regards to their nature of scientific assertions.

However, Scientism is not a scientific assertion.  It’s an assertion in a branch of philosophy.  It’s actually the philosophical claim that, “You can’t know whether philosophical claims are true – you can only know scientific claims.”  Therefore it, also, is self-refuting.

So, how is this all practical?

Going back to the dinner party I was invited to, the gentleman I met said that anything that can’t be tested in a lab is just hot air.  He continued for a few minutes before I interrupted him and said, “I’m having a few problems with some of your claims here.  You’re claiming that the only thing we can know is what can be quantified and empirically tested in a lab, and if you can’t do that, it’s simply hot air.”

He agreed with my understanding of his view.

I then replied, “Your very arguments don’t stand up to your own criteria for legitimacy.”  He thought about it and was stunned.

Another argument against Scientism is:  If scientism is true, it follows that there are certain things that we can’t know such as mental fortitude, Plutonic forms, God, angels, Satan and his demons, moral values, political assertions and the like.  But we can know these things.  Therefore Scientism is false.

For more engaging and encouraging videos and podcasts, check out the E-Squared Media Network at www.e2medianetwork.com

Uncategorized

apologetics

bible

christian

christianity

Empiricism

is the bible reliable

is the bible true?

JP Moreland

knowledge

naturalism

philosophy

scientism

study

theology

truth

Worldview

Previous Post



August 11, 2014

Ouxano 61: 1 Samuel, part 8 – 21st Century Idols

Next Post



August 12, 2014 The Daren Streblow Comedy Show Mini-Cast 64: Teen Deaf, Wil Twynstra & Carlos Oscar


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Brad Stine Has Issues Christian Podcast Central Classic Podcast Experience God Life Grounded Ouxano Parent Like You Mean It The Protest Show with Thor Ramsey The Summit Lecture Series Uncategorized What You’ve Been Searching For

Select a Month July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was swallowed by a great fish after being thrown overboard?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Saul Noah Jonah

Related posts from Christian Podcast Central

Evangelical

Parent Like You Mean It: Fight for their...

Christian Podcast Central

Evangelical

Parent Like You Mean It: Roe vs The...

Christian Podcast Central

Evangelical

Parent Like You Mean It: Whatchoo Talkin’ ‘Bout?...

Christian Podcast Central

Evangelical

Brad Stine Has Issues: How I’m Not Going...

Christian Podcast Central

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical - Sponsored

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical - Sponsored blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube