Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Family, Parenting and Religion
Male Headship is a Romance Killer

Male Headship is a Romance Killer

Last updated on: August 10, 2023 at 6:36 pm by Duncan Edward Pile

0 Comments

Male Headship is a Romance Killer 2023-08-10T18:36:41+01:00 Duncan Edward Pile

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the church of my youth, the Biblical principle of male headship was widely accepted. The Bible verses around it are quite clear, albeit written within a cultural context that is difficult for a modern reader to understand. 1 Corinthians 11: 3

But I want you to realise that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

As a married man, I find this problematic. Is it really saying that the head of a woman is a man whereas the head of a man is Christ? Does this mean a woman has a less direct connection to God than a man? Does she have to go through her ‘head’ to get God’s attention?

Paul intertwines this confusing relational assertion with cultural hair taboos (verses 4-7):

Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonours his head. But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonours her head—it is the same as having her head shaved. For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head.

A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man.

A man is the image and glory of God but a woman is the glory of man? How can this be right, when the creation account declares that both men and women were made in God’s image? Genesis 1:27

So God created mankind in his own image,

in the image of God he created them;

male and female he created them.

If both men and women were made in God’s image, why does Paul assert that man is the image and glory of God but woman is the glory of man? It gets stranger in verse 10:

It is for this reason that a woman ought to have authority over her own head, because of the angels.

When did the angels get involved?

Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians isn’t the only place such teaching is found. Ephesians 5:22-24

Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Saviour. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.

The husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head and saviour of the church? Are women saved by men? Are women to submit to men as unconditionally as men should surrender to Christ? Based on the following verses, this seems to be what the writer had in mind (verses 25-27):

Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her to make her holy, cleansing her by the washing with water through the word, and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless.

Why are men to cleanse their wives with the word? Are women spiritually sullied in a way that doesn’t apply to men? Does Christ need the intervention of men to save women?

The Bible also teaches that men and women are equal in Christ, which for me is a direct (but welcome) contradiction. Galatians 3:26-28

So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptised into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

The Implications of Male Headship

The notion of headship is archaic, perhaps reflecting thousands of years of patriarchy rather than the equality of being in Christ. When I read these passages, I see a society struggling with itself and its biases rather than one with all the answers. For me, the questions headship raises must be answered:

Is complementarianism (differing male and female roles), as laid out in these passages, a reflection of the culture at the time these epistles were written rather than eternal truth?
Surely we should reframe and refine these ideas using the knowledge gained in the past 2000+ years (and especially the last few hundred years)?
Shouldn’t we draw from the principles of psychology to understand what a belief in headship might do to a woman?
If a woman utterly submits to a man, hasn’t she given away her autonomy?
How does female submission apply in marriages where the man doesn’t perfectly yield to Christ? Isn’t that every marriage?
These passages are written about married men and women. What do they mean for a woman who is single? Does she have no chance of being saved? Can she not ‘wash her[self] with the word’, and if she can, why do married women need their husbands to do it?
Is it possible that thousands of years of patriarchy led to a male-centric framing of certain Biblical ideas? Now that we live in a more equal and fair society, isn’t this an imbalance to redress?

Headship Limits Romance

From my point of view, complementarianism doesn’t work. My wife and I would have to bend ourselves out of all natural shape to attempt it, and honestly, doing so would ruin a beautiful partnership. Within every relationship, a form of complementarianism (division of roles according to each partner’s natural strengths) is an entirely healthy thing – a form of teamwork in the family setting. In this sense, my wife and I have our own complementarian dance, its shape and movement our very own, but a universal structure that works for every couple, in which the bloke is always in charge?

Equality is the only environment in which intimacy can thrive – equal importance, equal respect, equal service – but if the husband is fundamentally the boss, equality is at best an illusion. If a man is the glory of Christ but a woman is only the glory of man, there’s no level space for a rendezvous. If a women is so fundamentally unsanctified she needs her husband to wash her with the word, how can that relationship be healthy for either partner?

The Problem is Inerrancy

I’ve argued in recent articles that the false doctrine of inerrancy (that the Bible is perfect in every way and can’t be questioned/reframed) exists to stop people from thinking for themselves. It is an idol, set up in place of a living relationship with Christ through the Holy Spirit, who interprets scripture to us. The first article in this series was on how Jesus interpreted scripture. The second was on the dangers and idolatry of inerrancy, and the third on how inerrancy is used to oppress women.

We need to look to the theological umbrella statement that there is no male or female in Christ rather than a specific set of instructions sent to a local church, bound as it was in its cultural biases.

Headship (enabled by the false doctrine of inerrancy) can be a fortress for frightened men who want to hold onto their power. It enables them to stay in charge whether they’re good leaders or not, but the Church needs better men than this. We need men who reverence and adore women, celebrating their individual qualities and strengths rather than clipping their wings at the door.

Truth be told, I suspect most Christians don’t really believe in male headship in any tangible or practical sense. I don’t see it in the marriages around me, but we play dumb and pretend we still believe it in order to preserve the ridiculous, man-made doctrine of inerrancy. Husbands, do you insist your wives cover their heads in church? Do you ban them from speaking in the congregation? Do you insist they save their questions for the privacy of your home rather than ask in the public setting of a church gathering? Do you insist they keep their hair long? I strongly suspect that for the vast majority of readers, the answer is no. Equally, I find it hard to believe that many Christian husbands truly believe they’re the boss at home. It simply isn’t the case for most of us, so why continue to pretend?

Progressive Christian

Family, Parenting and Religion

Christian marriage

Interpreting Scripture

Re-thinking Christian Concepts

Previous Post

August 3, 2023

Living A Lie – The Tragic Consequences of Exclusion

Next Post

August 18, 2023 The Dangers of Applying A Narrative

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"The issue is not having enough tax revenue. We're the richest country in the world ..."

Burke S

Tax The Rich

"What about the Laffer Curve?"

Harold Porter

Tax The Rich

"As I see it, the values espoused by self-described Christian nationalists (which really requires the ..."

frharry

The Rise of Cultural Christianity

"Most people when considering cultural Christianity view it merely as left-wing. Primarily because "cultural Christians" ..."

newenglandsun

The Rise of Cultural Christianity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A time for war and Sheol Authentic Faith Being in Christ Christian marriage Christian Mysticism Christian Nationalism Christian Parenting Christianity and Capitalism Christianity and politics Church and State De/reconstruction Discipleship Divine Healing Divine judgement Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater Effective Prayer Embracing the LGBTQ+ Community Embracing the LGBTQIA+ community End-Times Fellowship with his sufferings Gehenna Glorifying God God's heart for economic Justice Hades Healthy Debate Heaven and Earth Hell Honouring Christian Women I still believe inter-faith dialogue Interpreting Scripture Keep the faith Knowing the peace of God Living in Abundance Loving Each Other Loving God Loving Ourselves Mental Health Mental Health and Faith Old and New Covenants Practice Peace Prophecy Prophesy Re-thinking Christian Concepts Resist the Devil Revival Salvation Seeking God Sex and love sin and sinfulness Sound theology Spiritual Authority Spiritual discipline Spiritual effectiveness Spiritual Gifts Spiritual growth Spiritual Mentorship The Christmas story The Cross of Christ The divine feminine The Fear of the Lord The Holy Spirit The importance of kindness The importance of theology The MAGA Cult The Ministry of Jesus The risen Christ The service of Jesus The Sin of Greed the sin of judgement The spirit-filled life The Virgin Birth True worship Uncategorized Understanding God Understanding Old Testament prophecy Understanding Self-Worth Understanding the Bible Union with God War and Peace

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 September 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group primarily follows the teachings of Martin Luther?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptists Presbyterians Lutherans Methodists