Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Inerrancy Enforces the Repression of Women

Inerrancy Enforces the Repression of Women

Last updated on: July 17, 2023 at 5:19 am by Duncan Edward Pile

0 Comments

Inerrancy Enforces the Repression of Women 2023-07-17T05:19:41+01:00 Duncan Edward Pile

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I recently posted an article on full, unconditional inclusion of the LGBTQ+ community in the Church, and was greatly perplexed by the responses. From my point of view, the discussion went like this:

Me (by means of the article): ‘Inerrancy is forcing you to exclude the LGBTQ+ community, but it’s a false doctrine.’

Responses: ‘But the Bible says…’

In the politest possible way, I suggest this is missing the point. ‘The Bible says’ is not an argument for social injustice; for marginalisation, isolation, and exclusion. In my view, inerrancy is being used as a shield against compassion.

As previously discussed, the false doctrine of inerrancy is a modern invention, brewed up in the 19th century in response to Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859), in order to defend a literal reading of Genesis and oppose the important scientific discoveries of that time. In other words, the purpose of the doctrine’s invention is to install a ‘don’t think’ switch in every believer.

Personally, I know and love believers who hold to a literal reading of the creation account, but that’s nowhere near a universal stance these days. Many Evangelical Christians I know accept the Theory of Evolution in part or in full, treating the Genesis account of creation as allegorical.

This once-heated debate is a bit of a non-starter these days. I’ve not heard a literal interpretation of creation preached from the pulpit in decades, and we seem to be getting along just fine. The church hasn’t imploded. By stepping away from a literal reading of the creation account, the Evangelical movement has abandoned inerrancy’s original intent without harming itself. Indeed, we are much more likely to be listened to by the world as scientifically sensible people whose faith doesn’t require them to ignore the obvious.

Inerrancy may no longer be applied in its original intent, but it is still employed as a shield against societal developments. When important questions are asked, inerrancy grabs the handbrake with both hands and pulls with all its might.

Inerrancy breeds fear

I remember the first time my childhood belief in errancy was challenged. I was a card-carrying Evangelical in my first year of university, when a friend pointed out a potential ‘error’ in the Bible. He’d only just become a Christian and had no idea what his words would do to me. In fact, I remember he was shocked and immediately apologetic, but I had to resolve the crisis or my faith would be in jeopardy. What piercing observation had my friend made? Matthew 12:40

For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

My friend had pointed out that if Jesus died on a Friday and rose on a Sunday, he was only ‘in the heart of the earth’ for 2 nights.

Such is the fragility of inerrancy that this minor observation sent me into paroxysms of panic. I dug around in commentaries until I found a feeble answer to hide behind – that ‘3 days and 3 nights’ was a poetic phrase in Jewish writing and could be understood in a non-literal way. The relief was enormous! I accepted this paper-thin answer without question and took sanctuary – I could still believe the Bible was without error.

Thus began a journey that all who believe in errancy embark on – building a fort from unsatisfactory answers to take refuge in. The switch was flipped to ‘don’t think’ and, for many years, I didn’t. It never occurred to me that I was building a false structure in place of life-giving truth; worshiping an idol instead of the Living God.

Inerrancy suppresses women

Inerrancy forces us to close both our minds and our hearts. I’ve already discussed this in the context of the LGBTQ+ community, but the most egregious example of its harm is the glass ceiling imposed on women in the Church. I’ve argued in a previous post that we have (rightly) abandoned strict inerrancy when it comes to Paul’s teaching on women in our congregations. 1 Corinthians 11:13-16

Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice – nor do the churches of God.

Most churches have elected to quietly put this teaching aside. We have trusted our guts, accepting that ‘the very nature of things’ is a subjective matter. Similarly, we’ve largely moved on from a hard reading of Paul’s teachings on women’s silence in the church. I Cor 14: 33-35

As in all the congregations of the Lord’s people. Women should remain silent in the churches, They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says.

Although we have jettisoned a literal application of these verses, the odour is still in the air. One of the recent controversies in the Southern Baptist movement, for example, is that Rick Warren’s church was kicked out of the wider SB fellowship for allowing women to be pastors.

I know what some will say – this is a ‘headship’ issue rather than an example of women being silenced, but once you’ve abandoned inerrancy things become rather clearer. The Bible was written exclusively by men, living in cultures in which women took second or third place. Let’s not forget that women only got the vote in Western nations after WW1. For the vast majority of human history, women have been treated as second class citizens at best, including in the church.

I remember attending a Pentecostal conference in which the main speaker referred to his wife as his ‘helpmeet’, which is a lexical mistake derived from Genesis 2:18:

And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet (suitable) for him.

The way in which this verse is commonly understood reduces women to mere helpers of men. This is the problem with inerrancy – it forces us to take literal interpretations of passages that spring from an outdated cultural context, and then force that culture onto our own as if nothing we’ve learned in the past 2000 years has any value. In this sense, inerrancy is voluntary ignorance.

It should be no surprise then, that denominations such as the Southern Baptists think it’s perfectly legitimate to refuse women leadership roles, even though it means silencing women with leadership gifts. If you think about it, it’s not so different from insisting women be literally silent in church.

Inerrancy forces an unnatural division of roles

My wife and I do not apply any notions of male leadership in the family. I’m on board with the idea of complementary roles within a partnership, but it seems obvious to me that every couple is different, and therefore the complementary arrangement for every couple ought to be unique. My wife is much better with money than I am, and I rely on her to strategise and build pots of resources. She’s also a highly skilled psychotherapist, and often takes the lead in determining what’s best for our lad. I have a voice, which she actively seeks to hear, but there are times I put aside my preferences and follow her lead. Concurrently, there are areas where I take a lead and she stands back, and others where we are very much leading together, which is only healthy and good. If she and I believed in inerrancy, we would not have the freedom to work out and practice what’s best for our family. Instead, my voice would be given undeserved prominence and she would become muted except in areas of traditional female roles.

By thinking this way, many churches don’t permit women to bloom, leaving them in the shadow and lingering stink of thousands of years of cultural repression. If we followed Jesus’ example, we would love, honour, and elevate women, but by clinging to inerrancy we’ve made the scriptures a new kind of Law. There are women for whom traditional roles are comfortable, but my heart goes out to all those who don’t fit that mould – all the firebrands, sages, pastors, and teachers who never get to be themselves. Inerrancy is a man-made, false structure, marginalising at least 50% of the world’s population. I believe it is an idol and an enemy, harming every person who accepts it.

Progressive Christian

Interpreting Scripture

Re-thinking Christian Concepts

Understanding the Bible

Biblical infallibility

fearful theology

inerrancy

voluntary Christian ignorance

Previous Post

July 12, 2023

Sickness is Not in God’s Toolkit

Next Post

August 3, 2023 Living A Lie – The Tragic Consequences of Exclusion

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"As I see it, the values espoused by self-described Christian nationalists (which really requires the ..."

frharry

The Rise of Cultural Christianity

"Most people when considering cultural Christianity view it merely as left-wing. Primarily because "cultural Christians" ..."

newenglandsun

The Rise of Cultural Christianity

"A Good Follower of "The Way" of Yahushua , and a Good Person should go ..."

stephen hamilton

Is It More Important To Be ..."

"Dear Duncan — This is my conclusion about the Christianity of the Trump administration. Trump ..."

gottlieb spangenberg

When Politics and Values Clash

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A time for war and Sheol Authentic Faith Being in Christ Christian marriage Christian Mysticism Christian Nationalism Christian Parenting Christianity and politics Church and State De/reconstruction Discipleship Divine Healing Divine judgement Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater Effective Prayer Embracing the LGBTQ+ Community Embracing the LGBTQIA+ community End-Times Fellowship with his sufferings Gehenna Glorifying God Hades Healthy Debate Heaven and Earth Hell Honouring Christian Women I still believe inter-faith dialogue Interpreting Scripture Keep the faith Knowing the peace of God Living in Abundance Loving Each Other Loving God Loving Ourselves Mental Health Mental Health and Faith Old and New Covenants Practice Peace Prophecy Prophesy Re-thinking Christian Concepts Resist the Devil Revival Salvation Seeking God Sex and love sin and sinfulness Sound theology Spiritual Authority Spiritual discipline Spiritual effectiveness Spiritual Gifts Spiritual growth Spiritual Mentorship The Christmas story The Cross of Christ The divine feminine The Fear of the Lord The Holy Spirit The importance of kindness The importance of theology The MAGA Cult The Ministry of Jesus The risen Christ The service of Jesus the sin of judgement The spirit-filled life The Virgin Birth True worship Uncategorized Understanding God Understanding Old Testament prophecy Understanding Self-Worth Understanding the Bible Union with God War and Peace

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 September 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was struck dead instantly for lying about money they gave to the church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Judas Iscariot and Mary Magdalene Aquila and Priscilla Simon the Sorcerer and Demas Ananias and Sapphira