As the 2016 Election Cycle Begins, an Anti-Sneering Pledge

Last updated on: August 10, 2015 at 1:37 pm by K. Mulhern

As the 2016 Election Cycle Begins, an Anti-Sneering Pledge 2015-08-10T13:37:04-06:00 K. Mulhern

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Christos Georghiou / Shutterstock

As the 2016 election season launches in earnest, I’m still quivering a bit from the vitriol and animus of the 2012 Obama-Romney run. I’m still remembering that video of the little four-year-old sobbing because she was so very tired of Womney and Bronco Bamma.

I’m dreading the television ads, the robocalls, and the endless mailings that get increasingly ridiculous through the season. At least in 2012 I had a bird, and those mailings made very nice, and appropriate, cage liners. But now…no bird.

I need to steel myself for the political season. I need to prepare myself for debates and arguments and opinions and spins and commentators and nastiness and the inevitable “oops” of the season. Someone, somewhere is going to blow it big and the media will explode and the comboxes will overflow with waste like the Animas River after the recent EPA accident.

And I will disagree, strongly, with some candidates and their positions. And I will wish for better candidates all around, and I will be sorely tempted to loathe those who seem clueless and boneheaded and blind, deaf, and dumb to reality. And others will be equally tempted to loathe my ilk.

Okay, all that’s fair game. It’s the political machine that we have created.

But this year, this season, I’m going to take a pledge, one that I hope will help me retain some sanity through the next 15 months. Camille Paglia’s comments have inspired me. In her Salon interview, she speaks strongly about the sneering and snark so prevalent in our society – in the atheists’ attitudes toward religion, in the political postures of conservatives toward liberals and vice versa, and in the mainline media toward FOX news. She writes, “Snark is a disease that started with David Letterman and jumped to Jon Stewart and has proliferated since…He’s certainly a highly successful T.V. personality, but I think he has debased political discourse. I find nothing incisive in his work. As for his influence, if he helped produce the hackneyed polarization of moral liberals versus evil conservatives, then he’s partly at fault for the political stalemate in the United States.”

Paglia was speaking to her own liberal colleagues in that interview, but someone should write the same thing for the conservatives. No matter how much we might agree with an opinion, tone really does matter. I’m talking to you, O’Reilly.

The “disease” is already airborne on Facebook in the forms of mockery, ridicule, derision, and contempt around last week’s Republican debate. We love it – and there are so many opportunities for snark! The field is ripe for the contempt harvest. We relish the diminishment of the other through spiked insults under the guise of humor, and the good Lord knows I have been hurtfully flippant more than once in my life. But more than anything else, sneering diminishes me and divides me and weakens my ability to listen, to understand, to wrestle with real arguments, to find the place of compromise, and to love the other.

The air waves over the next year plus are going to be filled with snark, sneering, and contempt. You and I can both name half a dozen commentators and pundits on both sides of the political divide who are masters of it. “They” are so condescendingly patronizing, so arrogantly righteous – whose names did you fill in for “they”?

But here’s my pledge for the season, and invite you to sign on if you agree. (If you don’t, please don’t fill the comments with snark. Just move along – nothing to see here.) I am going to refrain from contempt, from smirking and jeering, from debased humor, from ridicule and scorn about all things pertaining to the 2016 election. I will even try to restrain eye-rolling. I consider myself perfectly free to disagree with candidates, to despise their arguments or their rhetoric, to shout and scream as necessary, but I will not sneer at them.

Our Lord chose as one of his Twelve a Zealot—a nationalist who was all primed for revolution and retribution. Jesus was clearly uninterested in that kind of revolution, but did he mock Simon’s passions, his perspectives? Did he think to himself, “No way. That guy is so out to lunch. All his huffing and puffing will get us nowhere. I need men of peace, not men of war. Not a chance I’m partnering with him over the next three years. He.Is.Clueless.”? He did not. He seemed to think Simon the Zealot would make a fine apostle.

The “debased political discourse” and “hackneyed polarization” that Paglia refers to runs deeply down into the guts of this nation, and insofar as I am contributing to it in the slightest way, I repent.

Previous Post

March 18, 2015

Jesus Loves Us Down to Our Toes: A Maundy Thursday Reflection

Next Post

August 17, 2015 To Be Patient Is to Be Free

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Ascetical Theology Book Reviews Children and Parenting Easter Epiphany Friends of God Lent Life in the Spirit Ludolph Pascalian Spirituality: a series Politics Prayers Six Neo-Christian Myths Spiritual Formation Tales from My Father Trinitarian Spirituality: a series Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 July 2024 June 2024 December 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 January 2023 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 April 2022 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 June 2016 April 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 March 2015 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 October 2011 August 2011 July 2011 February 2011 October 2010 September 2010 July 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which apostle was known as the "apostle to the Gentiles"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul James John Peter