Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Drishtikone

Home
Hindu
Reactions on Rajdeep Sardesai’s program on Modi’s speech at SRCC: shallow, rhetorical and lacking in substance

Reactions on Rajdeep Sardesai’s program on Modi’s speech at SRCC: shallow, rhetorical and lacking in substance

Last updated on: February 6, 2013 at 11:29 pm by Desh Kapoor

Reactions on Rajdeep Sardesai’s program on Modi’s speech at SRCC: shallow, rhetorical and lacking in substance 2013-02-06T23:29:56-06:00 Desh Kapoor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is the program on Modi’s speech at SRCC. It includes views of many youth, Aakar Patel (a Journalist), a Muslim professor from Jamia Milia, and Tania – a girl who rattled Mamata Bannerjee with a question.

Let us look at some of the material discussed:

Modi was planted by RSS as the Chief Minister in Gujarat, even though he didn’t have any experience and so his elevation is no different from Rahul Gandhi’s. (Aakar Patel): First, this journo talks with a certain amount of disdain (and he shows that very clearly when he is making fun of another panelist outright – Chiranjeev – when he is talking about the situation in Gujarat). Ok, this remark came in response to the statement of one guy that while Modi has come up and done what he has done on his own, without family backing, Rahul Gandhi has come with a silver spoon.

There are hundreds and thousands of RSS workers. Why elevate Modi? Was he related to someone in RSS – like Rahul Gandhi is? No. If RSS made him a leader, he must have raised his stature enough for them to recognize him. What is important is that AFTER he became the Chief Minister, he did the work on his own despite the opposition from all the sides, including within BJP and RSS. Aakar Patel’s remark is as stupid as saying that Dr. Manmohan Singh and Rahul Gandhi are BOTH hoisted by a family. Well they are.. ooops. Even though Dr. Singh has never been elected. Ok, my bad. Better example would be Lal Bahadur Shastri. He had no family backup. He was made the PM by Congress. So if a party makes someone a leader – that is akin to dynastic rule. That is effectively the argument that Aakar Patel is making. Which, using his own words is “Bogus and nonsense”!

Modi was responsible for Gujarat because he didn’t do enough (Tania, Jamia Prof and Aakar Patel): Let us see the history. Modi had no administrative experience when he was made the Chief Minister. We all know that. Aakar Patel confirms and reiterates that. In fact plays on it. So, let us look at it again. An inexperienced person becomes the Chief Minister in October 2001. Riots happen in February 2002. Roughly 3 months after he assumes charge. The critics’ main charge against him is that he didn’t do enough. At most you can castigate him for errors of omission – which given his experience (lack thereof) and the time he had to come to terms and mobilize his administration are very understandable.

Now, this is apart from the fact that none of the targeting by his critics has really been honest or even credible. Sanjiv Bhatt . Teesta Setalvad – 1 . 2 – the targeting has been nauseatingly hypocritical when it comes with complete clean chit to people in parties like Congress who have actually done the mass murders! Even in the Left parties. It is incredible that Nandigram is never reminded, but Gujarat seems to be the ONLY riots that have ever happened.

Last year riots happened in Deganga. Any word on that? Temples were destroyed, homes were brought down and burnt, business burnt, people killed and injured. NO word.

Let us STOP pretending that India has not seen before or since any riots other than Gujarat. Let us stop insulting everyone’s intelligence on this please. I am sure this Jamia professor didn’t give the advice he gives to Modi .. to Dr. Singh or Rahul Gandhi. Because he is only thinking as a Muslim who has a singular agenda in his mind. Maybe he should move around the country and look at all the riots that happen EVERY year and go stop them. That would do him a world of good, because if he was doing that, he wouldn’t have had to go to Gujarat in last 10 years!

Modi has attributed Gujarat’s growth to himself (Tania, Aakar): Isn’t that the norm? Aren’t these guys trashing Modi for what the “Gujaratis” did in 2002? So, in their book – Modi should be the fall guy for all the wrong that happens, but not get an ounce of credit for all the good that happens in his rule! Convenient, huh?! No matter what happens, they win.

Modi’s success is PR work and his oratory (Aakar, Tania, Prof from Jamia): Let us go with them. Do they know that Congress pays FAR more to its PR agencies than what Modi or any other party spends overall? If a journalist doesn’t know that scale of difference between the PR expenditure between Congress and the rest, then shame on him! Actually this question from Rajdeep was pretty rhetorical. The organizer kid from SRCC didn’t say that his oratory was all that Modi brought to the table. He said – Modi brought a track record, a credible administrative and leadership experience (key word) which was articulated well. Without a track record, Modi – with or without his so-called oratory – would have been toast long time back! He is no Vajpayee in oratory. What he has is the passion that he brings in his speech and along with a confidence that what he is saying can be done, because it HAS been done.

After all Modi is only selling hope. So are Rahul Gandhi, Mamata Bannerjee and South Indian Leaders (Aakar Patel): With this Aakar Patel takes the cake in utter nonsense. Modi is not “selling hope”, he is showing that there is hope for the whole country IF it follows the “Gujarat Model”. A model, which has been time and again and profusely been admired, praised and backed by many business leaders – top Indian ones including Ratan Tata, Adi Godrej and Anil Ambani and almost all the top MNCs. As far as his track record on creating successful business friendly economic environment goes, Ambani-Godrej-Tata have far more credibility than 1000 Aakars put together.

Hope is not just a word when it is used by Modi. Quite unlike Rahul Gandhi or Mamata Bannerjee. What has Mamata given to West Bengal? What has Rahul Gandhi really done except giving scripted speeches and going to poor people’s houses and eating food from Five Star kitchens specially brought in? To talk of Mamata Bannerjee – who is utterly corrupt and idiotic/opportunistic in her behavior to Modi shows the level of seriousness that people like Aakar have in their own journalism. After all, the stark difference between Mamata’s and Modi’s rule was decisively brought out by what happened to Nano. As they say – ‘nuf said!

Related articles from External Sources

Previous Post

February 6, 2013

Samsung to launch Wifi-enabled, Android based Fridge and Washing Machine with built-in Evernote app

Next Post

February 7, 2013 The Joy of Silence

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Aarti Achievement and Leadership AfPak Africa Annual and Year-end Asia Audio Australia Behavioural Sciences Bhagwad Gita Bhagwad Gita Blogging Blogs Business Business Intelligence Business Strategy Cannes Careers Chanakya China Conservation Corruption Creative Daily Links Desh Poems Development & Welfare Devotional Audio Devotional Songs Drama Earth Economics Education Entertainment Environment Europe Everyday Quotes Featured Articles Featured Songs Finance Flickr Pictures Food Geo-Political Global Warming Globalization Health & Medicine Hinduism Historic History Humour India Indian Culture Indian music Indian Weddings Israel Issues Legal Link Love Minorities Misc Motivation and Personal Development Movie Lists Movie Reviews Movies Mumbai terror attacks Natural Disasters Nature News Outsourcing Pakistan Parenting Personal Philosophy Poetry Politics Poverty Quotes Recipe Regular Blog Post Relationships Religion Religious/Spiritual Audio Sciences Showcase Slideshow South Asia Special Stories Spiritual Quotes Spirituality Sports Stories Strategy Technology Technology Terrorism Travel Uncategorized US Video Women Women_s Rights Worship Yoga

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 September 2014 August 2014 January 2014 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many people were added to the church on the day of Pentecost?

Select your answer to see how you score.

About 5,000 About 3,000 About 10,000 About 1,000