Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Drishtikone

The Big Fight (NDTV) on Higgs Boson: Some Reflections

Last updated on: July 8, 2012 at 12:02 pm   by Desh Kapoor

The Big Fight (NDTV) on Higgs Boson: Some Reflections 2012-07-08T12:02:52-05:00 Desh Kapoor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is a lot of interest in the “God Particle” and the debates on TV are happening on the subject as well.

The debate on NDTV under the title “The Big Fight” was one such discussion / debate.  My interest of entry in this debate was that my Guru, Sadhguru was also part of the panel.

The discussion was interesting and in many ways, the prejudices and biases of people came out as well as their stance.

Some of the interesting things – Swami Atma Preyananda of the RK Mission was an interesting person.  He was a trained Particle Physicist, until he turned a Monk.  So, he sort of straddled both the worlds – Science and Spirituality.

His point of reference for Spirituality was Swami Vivekananda.  And, I believe he suffered from the same issue of articulating the differentiating Spirituality and Religion, that Swami Vivekanandna (whom I admire and respect a lot) had.  For all his contribution to Spirituality, Swamiji used Religion and Spirituality interchangeably.  And that was the context of Swami Atma as well.

Dr. Bhargav, a scientist, is a “rationlist” somehow tried his best to “save his turf” of Science and not be “tainted by God” in any way.

The Spokesman of the Catholic Church of Delhi spoke intelligently, and I give him credit for at times questioning his own beliefs.

Then there was a sociologist, who was playing the class-joker, and was there merely to keep people in good spirits, while himself wondering at the “play” that was going on.

Then there was Dr. Ramana – who is a scientist and believes in God.  A friend and yet a frustrating example for Dr. Bhargav.

I want to discuss a few points that I found interesting in the whole conversation and things that I feel didn’t come out as well.

Religion, Spirituality and Science

First off the bat, Religion is NOT Spirituality.  These are two different things.  Religion is predicated on Belief, while Dharma or Spirituality is predicated on Search [Read the following for more on this difference: Bhagwad Gita is not about “Doing Good” . Dharma and Religion: the Foundational Difference]

Sadhguru’s entry point was always from the Spirituality context and not the Religion context.  Unfortunately, that point and differentiation didn’t quite come out clearly, because others kept muddling it all the time.  In the end, he did try to clarify, but the format of the program somehow never helped to clarify it.

So, it should have been Spirituality and Science and NOT Religion and Science discussion.  Unfortunately, except for Sadhguru, rest of the panel – including Vikram Chandra, the anchor – kept using these terms (Religion and Spirituality) – synonymously.  In fact, these days people – with fetish for “isms” – have come up with another word – Spiritualism, which is “go-between” compromise between Religion (which is belief system) and Spirituality (which is seeking).

I have seen that for non-Hindus, this distinction is almost impossible to fathom.  And amongst the Hindus, the more “intellectually accomplished” a person is, the greater his inability to get past the preconceived notion of religion and spirituality and complete confusion between the two.

In this panel for example, the archbishop had no idea about this, but Raja Ramana and even Swami Atma were confused.

Science and Spirituality: Is their quest similar?

In this sense – YES!  Why?

Because both, the Spiritualists and the Scientists, are asking the same question:

How did the Infinite manifest itself as the Finite?

Or in other words – How did Existence come from God? [Spiritualists articulation]  Or How did the matter manifest from Wave? [Scientists’ question]

The methods of both, are however, completely different.  While one is trying to know by inference.  Because direct observation is not possible and not even reliable.  The other is trying to know by direct experience.  Knowledge – through calculation or inference is not reliable and therefore, of no use for the Spiritualist.  This is important to understand.  If one even has the most reliable theory of existence, then what?  How does it make the human existence or the Universe a more worthwhile thing?  Yes, we will get another gadget created, another rocket sent to space.  But how does it make us any better equipped to deal with the immensity of the Existence?

And, for all the talk of “Scientific Rigor” amongst the scientists, honestly, I find them rather ideological.  All the Spiritual Masters that I have come across had extraordinary rigor.  They have questioned the heck out of everything to get to the answer.

So, Seeking is in both the places.  The question – fundamental question – is the same.  Methods are different.  Rigor is a self-congratulatory qualification bestowed by scientists upon themselves.

Modern Science and Spiritual Science

There is a fundamental principle of Seeking.  Seeking starts when Believing stops.  And, believing includes Disbelieving.  Opposite of Believing is Seeking, and not Disbelieving.

Now, this can manifest in two different ways.  When a Seeker is a Disbeliever of something, it will look at the world minus the object of disbelief.  Things / Concepts / knowledge that is disbelieved is brushed aside.  Openness is limited.  The realm in which this openness to question exists, there is rigor.  But the playing field for this rigor is already closed.  For, the world of disbelief is not about objects.  But about concepts and even a way of understanding things.  If Upanishads talk of Nothingness coming from a time, when the rest of the world was playing with rock implements, then it is important to ask the question, how did they reach that conclusion?  Unlike Dr. Ramana – that “just because the scripture says everything comes from Nothingness, it cannot be equated to conclusions of particle physics, because there are other facts in that theory to fall back on, while in scriptures there is no basis to that conclusion given”.

Such a failure of backup qualification and calculation, thankfully didn’t stop Dr. Hardy from recognizing the genius of Ramanujam, whose notebooks mostly contained theorems and not the back up work.

And, that is the point to understand.  The profundity and the immensity of the work articulated in Dharmic scriptures is tough in these terms, when Science says 1000 things and then constantly sniggers when you show a conclusion has already been there and part of Spiritual semantics forever.

Let us. therefore, look at a thing the profundity and the immensity of whose potency is impossible to debate against.  At least in the world today.  Yoga.  Specifically, Physical Yoga.

Now, Yoga is by far the most complete, comprehensive and the best exercise regimen the mankind has today.  No other method even comes close to it in the efficiency of what is done and the amount of benefit one can derive from it.  Just by breathing right, people have gotten rid of chronic ailments and even things like high Blood Cholesterol.

That Yoga is an Unique, Unbeatable and Highest form of exercise for complete Human well-being (mental and physical) that mankind has today is indisputable.

However, something that the scientists do not realize is that Yogis who came up with Yoga were NOT coming from the knowledge of Biology.  But from a different paradigm and dimension itself.  Yogis talk of Nadis and Chakras.  No modern science dissections have proved the existence of that.  But our confidence in Biology is what drives modern medical science.

How come someone, ostensibly, not as well conversant with all the medical advances of biological sciences but an expert in esoteric stuff like Chakras and Nadis (which are considered useless and non-existent by biologists) create a method that FAR SUPERSEDES anything that the modern Biologists have ever come up with?

I mean, if you are the most kick-ass Engineer that mankind has ever produced in the entire history, and all you come up with is a bicycle versus a guy whose knowledge you say is rubbish comes up with a kick ass Lamborghini with a mileage of 200 miles on a gallon and a life of 700,000 miles with an oil change every 50,000 miles (efficient, effective and comprehensive), then it is time to reflect.

And, it is THIS reflection – this admittance of need to reflect – that is taken away from a person, whose idea of Seeking is firmly established in Disbelief rather than Openness.

And that is why Sadhguru’s point – that it is crass to say that “My Seeking is better than yours, just because you cannot understand other person’s way” – makes sense.  It is this – almost – Exclusivist tendency, that I hold people like Dr. Bhargav in the same category as the religious.

The only difference between a religious person and Dr. Bhargav is that they belief in different things.  The fanaticism, however, is similar.

 

 

India

Sciences

Spirituality

Dr. Ramana

God Particle

Higgs Boson

NDTV

Ramakrishna Mission

Sadhguru

Swami Atma Priyananda

Swami Vivekananda

VIkram Chandra

Previous Post



July 6, 2012

26/11 was NOT a Terror Attack, but War Against India by Pakistan!

Next Post



July 8, 2012 Why Abu Jundal's Mother and his Ecosystem should be questioned and prosecuted


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Aarti Achievement and Leadership AfPak Africa Annual and Year-end Asia Audio Australia Behavioural Sciences Bhagwad Gita Bhagwad Gita Blogging Blogs Business Business Intelligence Business Strategy Cannes Careers Chanakya China Conservation Corruption Creative Daily Links Desh Poems Development & Welfare Devotional Audio Devotional Songs Drama Earth Economics Education Entertainment Environment Europe Everyday Quotes Featured Articles Featured Songs Finance Flickr Pictures Food Geo-Political Global Warming Globalization Health & Medicine Hinduism Historic History Humour India Indian Culture Indian music Indian Weddings Israel Issues Legal Link Love Minorities Misc Motivation and Personal Development Movie Lists Movie Reviews Movies Mumbai terror attacks Natural Disasters Nature News Outsourcing Pakistan Parenting Personal Philosophy Poetry Politics Poverty Quotes Recipe Regular Blog Post Relationships Religion Religious/Spiritual Audio Sciences Showcase Slideshow South Asia Special Stories Spiritual Quotes Spirituality Sports Stories Strategy Technology Technology Terrorism Travel Uncategorized US Video Women Women_s Rights Worship Yoga

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 September 2014 August 2014 January 2014 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What body of water did Peter walk on at Jesus' invitation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dead Sea Sea of Galilee Mediterranean Sea Red Sea

Related posts from Drishtikone

Hindu

Delhi: A City That Connects the Diverse

Drishtikone

Hindu

How the Historically Intolerant forces are now Preaching...

Drishtikone

Hindu

This Diwali Light a Lamp for Humanity's Future

Drishtikone

Hindu

Karwa Chauth: Why this celebration of love is...

Drishtikone

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Hindu

Indian Hindu pilot’s valor in line of duty...

  There is a hoary maritime tradition that the captain of the...

Movie on Neem Karoli Baba’s life is a...

Neem Karoli Baba’s life (1900-1973) is associated with miracles he made in...

20 Questions to Ask Before an Interfaith Marriage,...

Four questions every interfaith couple should discuss before marriage: Conversion. Will either...

Avadhānam: The Art of Concentration and Intellectual Mastery

What is Avadhānam? In the summer of 2015, during a three-day Sanskrit...

Jesus in the Dharma: Where Christ Fits in...

Where Does Jesus Fit in Hinduism? That’s a question I get often...

Hormuz: A Shared Hindu and Zoroastrian Heritage

Every evening, somewhere in the world, a newsreader utters the words: "The...

view all Hindu blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube