Is Pakistan taking on US in a high stakes gamble?

Last updated on: May 23, 2012 at 10:58 am by Desh Kapoor

Is Pakistan taking on US in a high stakes gamble? 2012-05-23T10:58:57-05:00 Desh Kapoor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Pakistan seems to be digging a greater hole for itself. It has played its hand way over its “pay grade” by going after US and snubbing them openly.

First it was a snub to Obama – where the US President had given an invite to Pakistan’s Zardari at the last minute with the hope of getting the route for NATO supplies opened. There was no deal.

When the White House sent a last-minute invitation for Asif Ali Zardari to attend the two-day NATO summit, they were taking a highly public gamble. Would sharing the spotlight with President Barack Obama and other global leaders induce the Pakistan president to allow vital supplies to reach alliance troops fighting in Afghanistan?

But long before the summit ended Monday, the answer was clear: No deal.

Zardari’s refusal to re-open the supply routes left a diplomatic blot on a summit that NATO sought to cast as the beginning of the end of the conflict in Afghanistan.

Just before that, in the negotiations with US Defense Secretary Leo Panetta, Pakistani officials demanded a 30 times increase in the transit fees to $5000 for each truck carrying supplies for troops in Afghanistan across its territory.

US Defence Secretary Leon E. Panetta, meanwhile, told L.A. Times that he planned to confront Pakistan over what he considered price gouging for transport of supplies to Afghanistan and hoped for a ‘consensus’ among allies over the war effort.

Mr Panetta ruled out paying Pakistan $5,000 for each truck carrying supplies across its territory for Nato troops in Afghanistan. Pakistani officials have demanded that amount as a condition for reopening supply routes that have been closed to the alliance since fall.

Pakistan is doing this with the assumption that US has no alternatives to it in moving its supplies to its troops in Afghanistan and denying them the route will mean the end of US engagement in Afghanistan. That may not be the only way this game may go.

For example, there is a Northern Distribution Network and route option available to the Americans. It is not cheap, but then price gouging by the Pakistanis is not acceptable either.

US officials have indicated that it has been about three to four times more expensive (or about $38 million more per month) for the US and NATO to rely solely on the so-called Northern Distribution Network through the Baltic states, Russia, and Central Asia. But the cutoff of Pakistani routes did not force the US to alter the tempo of its military operations inside Afghanistan. Moreover, many of the countries involved in the Northern Distribution Network showed eagerness to continue to serve as supply routes both into and out of Afghanistan in order to receive transit fees.

In fact, Russia is reportedly considering allowing NATO to use one of its airfields to move troops and non-lethal cargo to and from Afghanistan. While Pakistan still represents potentially the cheapest and most efficient transit route for supplies, the US and NATO have other options if Pakistan continues to make unrealistic demands.

Another Nail in the Coffin?

Meanwhile, close on the heels of this controversy on the NATO Supply Routes, comes another action by Pakistan that will further push US to move against it.

A Pakistani doctor who helped the U.S. track down Osama bin Laden has been convicted of high treason and sentenced to 33 years in prison, according to a government official.

Nasir Khan said Shakil Afridi was also ordered Wednesday to pay a fine of about $3,500. If he doesn’t pay, he will spend another three and half years in prison. Mr. Khan is a government official in Pakistan’s Khyber tribal area, where Dr. Afridi was tried.

So basically, Pakistanis are suggesting that Osama Bin Laden was a national asset and anyone who has compromised his security is guilty of “High Treason”.

Now, that may take the trajectory of Pakistan into an area it might repent later – of Terrorist States!

Wonder if the Pakistani population and its Government agencies understand this situation, but any country who has played its hand over the top, usually gets messed up by the US. And the process starts by framing that nation in a corner.

Currently, an entire case is being prepared for framing Pakistan in the corner, where unilteral or multi-lateral action can be taken against it. Due to Pak’s nukes, it may not be easy, but so wasn’t eliminating Osama.

One hopes that there is someone intelligent in the country to avoid this disaster waiting to happen in our neighborhood. But if my reading of Pakistan and its mindset is correct, it is hurling itself over the cliff in a hurry. And the mood is of self destruction along with destroying others. And it might involve unprecedented use of Nukes in such a situation.

Pakistan

Politics

Terrorism

Previous Post

May 21, 2012

Is the Rupee headed to Rs 58/$?

Next Post

May 24, 2012 "Are my hair just like yours, Mr. President?"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Aarti Achievement and Leadership AfPak Africa Annual and Year-end Asia Audio Australia Behavioural Sciences Bhagwad Gita Bhagwad Gita Blogging Blogs Business Business Intelligence Business Strategy Cannes Careers Chanakya China Conservation Corruption Creative Daily Links Desh Poems Development & Welfare Devotional Audio Devotional Songs Drama Earth Economics Education Entertainment Environment Europe Everyday Quotes Featured Articles Featured Songs Finance Flickr Pictures Food Geo-Political Global Warming Globalization Health & Medicine Hinduism Historic History Humour India Indian Culture Indian music Indian Weddings Israel Issues Legal Link Love Minorities Misc Motivation and Personal Development Movie Lists Movie Reviews Movies Mumbai terror attacks Natural Disasters Nature News Outsourcing Pakistan Parenting Personal Philosophy Poetry Politics Poverty Quotes Recipe Regular Blog Post Relationships Religion Religious/Spiritual Audio Sciences Showcase Slideshow South Asia Special Stories Spiritual Quotes Spirituality Sports Stories Strategy Technology Technology Terrorism Travel Uncategorized US Video Women Women_s Rights Worship Yoga

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 September 2014 August 2014 January 2014 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who had a dream about a statue made of various metals?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Nebuchadnezzar David Joseph