Are Cricket Umpires Racist?

Last updated on: March 14, 2011 at 1:22 am by Drea Parker

Are Cricket Umpires Racist? 2011-03-14T01:22:26-05:00 Drea Parker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A study on bias in cricket is long overdue. The sport is data rich – names of bowlers, batsmen and umpires are readily available. Crunch all that data and it won’t be hard to figure out if umpires are handing down tricky decisions based on race, colour and country.

International cricket today resembles a geopolitical battleground rather than a contest between willow and leather. The latest flashpoint was the high-octane 2011 World Cup game between India and England during which umpires Billy Bowden (New Zealand) and M. Erasmus (South Africa) and TV umpire R.J. Tucker (Australia) ruled an England player “not out” even after the electronic review system ruled in India’s favour.

The controversy would have died out as the tournament progressed but then Dave Richardson, the stuffed suit at the ICC, reignited it by criticising Indian captain M.S. Dhoni for disputing that decision. Richardson, a servant of cricket’s governing body, was clearly out of line here by blathering off against Dhoni, cricket’s most valuable player.

The fact is that the fine print in the rule book is called into play only when Indian and Pakistani players are involved. In fact, players from the two countries are consistently handed out heavy fines or match suspensions or both while for similar offences, players from, say, Australia, England or South Africa get a mere warning or at worst a reprimand. Basically, a wink and a nod.

If you are not convinced there is bias in cricket, perhaps you should look at a study on racial bias in baseball by Daniel Hamermesh, a professor of economics at the University of Texas, Austin. Among sports, baseball comes closest to cricket in the manner of play, terminology and gear.

After analysing 2.1 million pitches in Major League Baseball from 2004 to 2006, the study says that the highest percentage of fair calls occur when both umpire and pitcher (bowler in cricket) are white, while the lowest percentage is when a white umpire is judging a Black pitcher. The results showed that in about 1% of the pitches thrown, an umpire was more likely to rule in favour of the pitcher if both were of the same race or ethnicity.

What? A measly 1! Well, look at what the study says next: “At first, this effect may seem trivial, affecting on average less than one pitch per game. The indirect effect—when players anticipate the effect of a biased umpire and strategically alter their behaviour—may, however, have an even larger impact on outcomes.”

Steve Bucknor: Prayers couldn’t save him.
Baseball, like cricket, is a very closely played game. If a pitcher suspects his questionable throws may be called good, he’ll throw more aggressively. But if he knows the umpires are biased against him, he might be forced to throw directly at the plate, making it easier for the hitters to clear the park.

Two such situations in cricket can be recalled here. One was the 2008 Sydney game where Australia, knowing that umpires Mark Benson and Steve Bucknor were handing down a spate of poor decisions against Indian batsmen, went for the offensive after being in hopeless situations several times.

Again, in a 1978-79 series in Pakistan, Indian legend Sunil Gavaskar remembers Pakistan pace bowler Imran Khan consistently overstepping the crease. Gavaskar, who was at the non-striker’s end, pointed it out to the umpires who ignored his protests and allowed Khan to get away with his no-balls.

Baseball is not the only arena where racial bias has been discovered.

Economists Joe Price of Brigham Young University and Justin Wolfers of the University of Pennsylvania studied NBA data and found that during the 13 seasons from 1991 through 2004, white referees called fouls at a greater rate against black players than against white players.

They went on to claim that the different rates at which fouls are called “is large enough that the probability of a team winning is noticeably affected by the racial composition of the refereeing crew assigned to the game”.

The results are also troubling because it hits the players where it hurts most. Because a baseball pitcher’s salary is negotiated based on his success on the field, and because close to 90 per cent of umpires are Caucasian, then pitchers who are a minority are also at an economic disadvantage.

The bias in cricket is not just white and black, of course. Bucknor, who is of African origin, had given unfair decisions against Indian players for well over two decades before he was kicked out in 2008. And strangely, Sri Lankan players, who have suffered extreme racism from the Australian Prime Minister down, have, after becoming match officials, penalised Indian players severely while letting off Australian and English players with mere warnings. Two Lankans who consistently offended are Ranjan Madugalle and Roshan Mahanama. They once fined an Indian bowler for “over-zealous celebration”.

So what’s the way out? Despite India’s aversion – in hindsight, justified – for the electronic review system, the way out is better technology and closer monitoring. The American studies established that bias disappears under two conditions – when the game’s attendance is high or electronic review technology is used.

“When you’re going to be watched and have to pay more attention, you don’t subconsciously favour people like yourself. When discrimination has a price, you don’t observe it as much,” says Hamermesh. A parallel study at McGill University supported the findings. Bias is magnified in situations where there is comparatively little scrutiny on the umpire – in stadiums that are not equipped with computerised monitoring systems, it says.

To be sure, most umpires do not intend to be biased before a game. As the American researchers argue, bad decisions appear to be the result of “implicit bias” – subtle mental associations that surface when people are forced to make snap judgments.

In the cricket world, with its considerable colonial baggage, that bias comes into play too often for comfort. Only foolproof technology can be the game changer that negates the role of bias in cricket. For, as Bowden, Erasmus and Tucker show, there are a lot of fools out there.

Minorities

Sports

Previous Post

March 13, 2011

Padded Bras, Perky Breasts and Islam: Government of Pakistan body protests against padded bras!

Next Post

March 14, 2011 web

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Aarti Achievement and Leadership AfPak Africa Annual and Year-end Asia Audio Australia Behavioural Sciences Bhagwad Gita Bhagwad Gita Blogging Blogs Business Business Intelligence Business Strategy Cannes Careers Chanakya China Conservation Corruption Creative Daily Links Desh Poems Development & Welfare Devotional Audio Devotional Songs Drama Earth Economics Education Entertainment Environment Europe Everyday Quotes Featured Articles Featured Songs Finance Flickr Pictures Food Geo-Political Global Warming Globalization Health & Medicine Hinduism Historic History Humour India Indian Culture Indian music Indian Weddings Israel Issues Legal Link Love Minorities Misc Motivation and Personal Development Movie Lists Movie Reviews Movies Mumbai terror attacks Natural Disasters Nature News Outsourcing Pakistan Parenting Personal Philosophy Poetry Politics Poverty Quotes Recipe Regular Blog Post Relationships Religion Religious/Spiritual Audio Sciences Showcase Slideshow South Asia Special Stories Spiritual Quotes Spirituality Sports Stories Strategy Technology Technology Terrorism Travel Uncategorized US Video Women Women_s Rights Worship Yoga

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 September 2014 August 2014 January 2014 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the prodigal son ask his father for?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His inheritance A new home A wife A sword