Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Drishtikone

Home
Hindu
Cult of Eminent Indian Historians and the Ayodhya verdict

Cult of Eminent Indian Historians and the Ayodhya verdict

Last updated on: October 9, 2010 at 5:59 pm by Desh Kapoor

Cult of Eminent Indian Historians and the Ayodhya verdict 2010-10-09T17:59:59-05:00 Desh Kapoor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It has been said time and again that the so called “Indian History” experts were anything but. Justice Aggarwal declared:

“One cannot say that though I had made a statement but I am not responsible for its authenticity since it is not based on my study or research but what I have learnt from what others have uttered”.

But that is precisely what the so called “experts” were doing! Here is an interesting low down and their “qualifications” on these so called History and Archeology “experts” in India:

Suvira Jaiswal deposed “whatever knowledge I gained with respect to disputed site is based on newspaper reports or what others told” (other experts). She said she prepared a report on the Babri dispute “after reading newspaper reports and on basis of discussions with medieval history expert in my department.”

Supriya Verma, another expert who challenged the ASI excavations, had not read the ground penetration radar survey report that led the court to order an excavation

Shereen F Ratnagar (Archaeologist) has written the “introduction” to the book of another expert who deposed, Professor Mandal. She admitted she had no field experience.

Wikipedia introduces her as “She was a professor of archaeology and ancient history at the Centre for Historical Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi”. (Note the interesting factoid that a professor of archeology, as per her OWN admission under oath in front of a High Court bench declared she had NO FIELD EXPERIENCE)

Supriya Verma and Jaya Menon alleged that pillar bases at the excavated site had been planted but HC found they were not present at the time the actual excavation took place.

Interestingly, Supriya Verma who probably also gets her history lessons from Newspapers and Hearsay is all agitated, for obvious reasons:

“It is almost as though they themselves were not convinced by the evidence. They are clearly conceding that there was no archaeological evidence of a temple or of its demolition…It is a judgement of theology,” she said.

Incidentally, Supriya Verma has done her PhD under this Shereen Ratnagar, which calls into question as to what was she even learning?? And that brings us to another main point:

The NEXUS OF HISTORY FICTION WRITERS

We saw that Supriya Verma who apparently writes and challenges history without being privy to any official report – probably based on newspaper reports (like her colleague Suvira Jaiswal) who in turn quote her as an expert and publish that “history” in the first place; had gotten her PhD. under another “archeologist”. Judge Aggarwal puts the “secret” of this entire nexus in the best possible words:

He also pointed out how the independent witnesses were all connected — one had done a PhD under the other, another had contributed an article to a book penned by a witness.

The group of “Eminent Indian Historians” is a CULT. They promote each other, give PhDs to each other, write prefaces and articles to each other’s publications and promote them – based of course on each other’s writings and newspaper (which are no more than Tabloids anyway) reports.

Arun Shourie wrote a book titled “Eminent Historians” (a sarcastic title for the expose on this Cult of Historians). He had suggested – with merit, it now seems – that:

During the past fifty years, “this bunch of Marxist historians have been suppressing facts, inventing lies, perverting discourse, and derailing public policy” by seizing control of institutions such as the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR), the National Council of Educational Research Training (NCERT), large parts of Indian academia, and nearly all of the English-media newspapers and publishing houses.

This group is not very large – probably over 40 – but it keeps circulating the “Eminence” around for each other. The main characters and protagonists of this Cult of Historians group are Romila Thapar, Satish Chandra, K.M. Shrimali, K.M.Pannikar, R.S. Sharma, D. N. Jha, Gyanendra Pandey, and Irfan Habib.

So strong is the hold of these historians on even the publishing industry that Arun Shourie had to self-publish his books because no one would let him publish his books. In context of this, the exchange between Arun Shourie and KL Shrimali (an “Eminent”) is very interesting:

In July 1998, Manoj Raghuvanshi, host of a popular ZEE TV program called Aap ki Adalat, Aap ka Faisla (Your Court, You Judge) invited Arun Shourie and one of the “eminents,” K. L. Shrimali. Raghuvanshi posed the question first to Shrimali whether Aurangzeb was a religious bigot. Despite Raghuvanshi’s repeating the question, Shrimali gave no clear answer, only asserting that Aurangzeb’s court had many Hindu nobles. Shourie countered this by pointing out that there were many Indians among the persons honored by the British with titles – – and both for the same reason. In Shourie’s words: “How does this wipe away the destruction of Hindu temples by Aurangzeb? Aurangzeb had entertained no doubt about the fact that his primary impluse was the religious one. And that he faithfully implemented an essential element of his religion, Islam, that is to destroy the places of worship of other religions.” As evidence, Shourie read out several passages from Sita Ram Goel’s book Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them, The Islamic Evidence. All Shrimali could mumble was that it was a “questionable source.” When Shourie pressed the point that the source was the Akhbarat (Newsletter) of the Court of Aurangzeb himself written on the very day the news reached the court, the “eminent” historian merely repeated “questionable source.” Shourie comments: “So, when an ’eminent’ historian says that the sources were questionable, they must be questionable” – – this is their technology when cornered.”

“Eminents” of the Cult of Historians are miffed

Coming back to the Ayodhya judgment. What has miffed these “History and Archeology” experts and which has really ticked them off is that the Allahabad High Court and Archeological Survey of India clearly and unequivocally cooked their goose by ordering the excavations at the site. Until it was done, these guys – based on each other’s lies and newspapers reports – were giving out fictional stories about our history as they pleased. You can see the level of frustration in the tone of another one of the same society (D.N. Jha, history professor at the Delhi University):

Dr. Jha asked why the court had requested an excavation of the site. “If it is a case of ‘belief,’ then it becomes an issue of theology, not archaeology. Should the judiciary be deciding cases on the basis of theology is a question that needs to be asked,” he said.

Now, look at his argument and logic: The Court should NOT have excavated the site. Why? Because by doing so it gave precedence over Theology as opposed to Archeology!

Huh what!??!! One does excavations to find more evidence, so how does that become an issue of theology?? Excavations could have found that there was nothing under the structure at all. But that’s not how it happened!

Well, he further goes on to say:

“The historical evidence has not been taken into account.”

Depends, of course, what Jha really means by “History” – because in case of these guys History gets broken down to His-Story.

As has been said time and time again on Drishtikone, that Indian History is a bunch of baloney written by people who have no more expertise in History and Archeological Stories than the famous writer in Indian hinterlands – Gulshan Nanda. We might be better off letting him write our NCERT history books for us. At least they will be more dramatic and interesting and kids may actually read them before their exams instead of depending on “kunjis”!

Education

History

India

Previous Post

October 8, 2010

Walking into a Mosque over Ancient Temple entails a Price for Our Future

Next Post

October 10, 2010 Reliance in Bid for MGM; planning bigger piece of Hollywood pie!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Aarti Achievement and Leadership AfPak Africa Annual and Year-end Asia Audio Australia Behavioural Sciences Bhagwad Gita Bhagwad Gita Blogging Blogs Business Business Intelligence Business Strategy Cannes Careers Chanakya China Conservation Corruption Creative Daily Links Desh Poems Development & Welfare Devotional Audio Devotional Songs Drama Earth Economics Education Entertainment Environment Europe Everyday Quotes Featured Articles Featured Songs Finance Flickr Pictures Food Geo-Political Global Warming Globalization Health & Medicine Hinduism Historic History Humour India Indian Culture Indian music Indian Weddings Israel Issues Legal Link Love Minorities Misc Motivation and Personal Development Movie Lists Movie Reviews Movies Mumbai terror attacks Natural Disasters Nature News Outsourcing Pakistan Parenting Personal Philosophy Poetry Politics Poverty Quotes Recipe Regular Blog Post Relationships Religion Religious/Spiritual Audio Sciences Showcase Slideshow South Asia Special Stories Spiritual Quotes Spirituality Sports Stories Strategy Technology Technology Terrorism Travel Uncategorized US Video Women Women_s Rights Worship Yoga

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 September 2014 August 2014 January 2014 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I was rejected by God as king for offering an unauthorized sacrifice instead of waiting. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Solomon Saul Rehoboam