Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Drishtikone

Home
Hindu
Swami Nithyananda Scandal: Dangerous and Tough Road to Spiritual Liberation

Swami Nithyananda Scandal: Dangerous and Tough Road to Spiritual Liberation

Last updated on: March 14, 2010 at 10:04 pm by Desh Kapoor

Swami Nithyananda Scandal: Dangerous and Tough Road to Spiritual Liberation 2010-03-14T22:04:18-05:00 Desh Kapoor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A few weeks back, when I first saw the video of Swami Nithyananda preaching, my impression of him was that of a person who has gained lot of knowledge at a very young age but probably not an enlightened being. Now, I don’t consider myself an authority on Enlightened beings, lesser still an agency to proclaim who is and who isn’t.

Spirituality is a tough road with many pitfalls. One can intellectually know what is the Truth but not necessarily able to implement it. On the other hand, what seems like “violation” of the Spiritual “creed” may be an acceptable action from the overall Spiritual standpoint. It is not unusual for lay people to get confused between the apparent lack of consistency between actions of Krishna or Guru Gobind Singh and that of Buddha or Guru Nanak with respect to linkage between Non-Violence and Enlightenment. It is as if these two groups would talk different languages and live in different worlds.

One of the biggest issue also of Spirituality is of inability of the language to express the Infinite Truth. The books try it but fail and that is why the Enlightened beings from Krishna to Nanak to Sadhguru Jaggi have chastised people on just repeating the words from the books without understanding them. Expressed in different semantics, what they have tried to impress is that its important to get to the core of the words and explore the land at which they point to. Literal reading of these books can often lead people to get into the quagmire of Sin, Virtue, Heaven, Hell, Good, Bad and all kinds of useless moral dichotomies.

That is the level – of being held by dichotomies – is where Nithyananda was, as I understood him. His understanding of the scriptures was sometimes literal and sometimes profound. But that he was even trying at his age and made it as far as he did made me respect him.

A few weeks back a video surfaced of him or someone looking like him (Nithyananda’s spokesmen have alleged that the video is morphed) having intimate moments with a lady (an actress from South India). Interestingly, it is not just this video that has surfaced, strangely for some unknown reason so have several other “scandals” without any evidence come out in media.

.. And media, voyeuristic and thoughtless as it is goes out and starts repeating ad nauseum without any investigation.

Krishamurti and my dilemma

A few years back I had “discovered” Jiddu Krishnamurti. A spiritual soul without compare. Very few people in history have had that kind of incisive intellect as JK. He could debate and discuss on any topic with a sharp razor and lay the inanity of the society and the listener threadbare! Within a few months of reading and immersing in his amazing wisdom, I came across a story of Rosalind Rajagopal. In the story, written by her daughter, Radha, it was alleged that JK and Rosalind were in sexual relationship for almost 25 years during which the lady lover had gone through multiple abortions. Rosalind was the wife of his friend Rajagopal who was his manager as well. (Book: Lives in the Shadow With J. Krishnamurti by Radha Rajagopal Sloss)

After the story had come out during his time, many of his “friends” – including David Bohm, with whom he had numerous vidoes, books and discussions – decided to part ways.

Here I was – completely immersed in this giant of a thinker and spiritual revolutionary and here I got to hear something that society at wide finds “sinful”. What was I to make of it? My fight was my own. There was no one watching and no one debating with me. I, despite my reasonably good understanding of JK’s rather tough line of thought (or so I believed) was struggling to view him in the color that society views all.

Here was a man and a woman who had, ostensibly, on their own accord developed attraction and chose to give it a physical manifestation on a regular basis. Yes, both had their own relationships and attachments and their own baggage… but was that all of any importance?

Relationships

Osho had once said that marriage is probably the most Immoral Institution known to mankind. Probably, what he meant was its the most unspiritual. I tend to agree with him.

All relationships are “unspiritual” in the way they are practised and lived. Relationships in the general society entitles the related a right over other’s mind and body. “My so and so (sister, daughter, brother, son, friend.. ) cannot do that!” is a common refrain. Such sentiments are a reflection of a yearning to have ownership.

Sex, being what it is, is the poster child of degree to which a relationship attributes the right on a related to ownership. No other act in a person’s life even comes close!

Going back to Nithyananda now. So, here is this guy, who is in his 30s and has lived the life of an ascetic with the hope and the aim to get enlightened probably pushed by his innate instinct for liberation. He started a lot of things and in this age and world deprived of even basic and most rudimentary self-introspection, he seemed to set fire to many people’s imagination.

Even as he interprets and talks of Spirituality, he treads on the track which is very difficult to walk and emulate when he says that “sex outside of marriage is sinful”, without properly reflecting the potency and the power of desires.. sometimes buoyed by the Karmic impressions embedded for centuries / millenia in the Karmic Mind. Very very rare are those who can live beyond the power of their desires and be free from them.

Two aspects of Spiritual Journey

Path to Spiritual liberation is a tricky one. It has two aspects: Experiences and Dissolution.

The former is easier to encounter. Many have. Even rudimentary healing powers which normal people using taught techniques can learn are part of that realm. But that is not the real thing. For example, the greatness of Jesus was not his healing powers – calling that his greatest gift is to denigrate his soul really – but his complete dissolution of identity.

Further experiences could be like feeling of “Oneness” or experience of “Nothingness”.. etc. Even that, as amazing as it may seem, is still just an experiential aspect. Its not liberation. Liberation is far beyond that.

Unfortunately, when people encounter such experiences, which defy mind and logic and the “normal”, they assume Enlightenment or Liberation. And that leads them to lower the guard. They are “there”, they think so they are invincible and untouched.

But is that so?

None of the Enlightened souls had it easy. Nanak had a lot of rabid critics as did Buddha.. as did Jesus. And people like Duryodhana had even painted Krishna as a virtual demon and low life!

If experiences was everything, then it would have been very easy to startle the hell out of the critics and beat them up by sheer miracles of the most rudimentary level. But that is not all. Something else is even more important and critical in this journey. It is not to do with relationships or with others.. but with Self. One’s own self.

Becoming a Guru is not a trivial act. It is very serious. If one runs out to declare at the first experience about what the “Truth” is, then the chances are that all will be lost for that person. That is why, students used to wait years after the first experiences of Enlightenment before they were asked by the Teachers (Rishis) to leave the ashram and go out on their own. The wait was not to quash competition but to make sure, the person going out won’t hurt others and get hurt himself.

Such discipline is, unfortunately, absent now. And as for Nithyananda, he has not failed anyone.. but himself, irrespective of the video being morphed or not.

Spirituality

Previous Post

March 14, 2010

Avatar: James Cameron's 'Regrettable' Ode to Krishna

Next Post

March 15, 2010 Mumbai terror plot foiled, two held

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Aarti Achievement and Leadership AfPak Africa Annual and Year-end Asia Audio Australia Behavioural Sciences Bhagwad Gita Bhagwad Gita Blogging Blogs Business Business Intelligence Business Strategy Cannes Careers Chanakya China Conservation Corruption Creative Daily Links Desh Poems Development & Welfare Devotional Audio Devotional Songs Drama Earth Economics Education Entertainment Environment Europe Everyday Quotes Featured Articles Featured Songs Finance Flickr Pictures Food Geo-Political Global Warming Globalization Health & Medicine Hinduism Historic History Humour India Indian Culture Indian music Indian Weddings Israel Issues Legal Link Love Minorities Misc Motivation and Personal Development Movie Lists Movie Reviews Movies Mumbai terror attacks Natural Disasters Nature News Outsourcing Pakistan Parenting Personal Philosophy Poetry Politics Poverty Quotes Recipe Regular Blog Post Relationships Religion Religious/Spiritual Audio Sciences Showcase Slideshow South Asia Special Stories Spiritual Quotes Spirituality Sports Stories Strategy Technology Technology Terrorism Travel Uncategorized US Video Women Women_s Rights Worship Yoga

Select a Month December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 September 2014 August 2014 January 2014 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What nature miracle did Jesus perform during a storm on the sea?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Walked on water Calmed the wind and waves Turned water to oil Fed the crew