Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Doxology Project

Home
General Christian
In praise of the rural life: Challenging the narrative of decline

In praise of the rural life: Challenging the narrative of decline

Last updated on: October 24, 2016 at 3:09 pm by Brad Roth

In praise of the rural life: Challenging the narrative of decline 2016-10-24T15:09:37-05:00 Brad Roth

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Concern for the breakdown of rural life is old. Since at least the time of the Roman poet Virgil, rural communities have been imagined both as idylls where the moral formation of the nation takes place alongside the cultivation of the earth, and as places threatened by the might and muscle of modernity. In the popular imagination, rural communities are simultaneously a source of wholesomeness and decay.

One way this has played out is in an offhand dismissal of rural communities as places where people might actually choose to live. Take the recent kids movie Zootopia. The goal of any bright-eyed and ambitious country critter is to make it big in the diverse city. It’s a perfect mix of our culture’s narrative of movement combined with one of the last acceptable prejudices: the prejudice against rural people. Only carrot farming losers stay put in the sticks. If the foxes are right, rural places are for “dumb bunnies.”

In this long-running narrative of the West, civilization is urbanization. Cities are like nirvana: the enlightened go there. Already at the turn of the twentieth century, a movement was afoot to challenge this narrative and the widespread population shift to the city that accompanied it. No less a figure than Teddy Roosevelt weighed in, echoing concerns raised by his Country Life Commission. Writes President Roosevelt:

The great recent progress made in city life is not a full measure of our civilization; for our civilization rests at bottom on the wholesomeness, the attractiveness, and the completeness, as well as the prosperity, of life in the country. (Report of the Country Life Commission, 1909, p.9).

The Country Life Commission sought to make life in rural communities attractive, not just because that’s where the nation’s food came from, but because the countryside was also seen as the source of our moral fiber. As writer Kevin Lowe documents in his history of American agrarian movements, Baptized with the Soil, the Commission mobilized vast resources, both government and faith-based. Although the Country Life Commission succeeded in raising government awareness of the challenges of rural communities and made concrete progress in the form of rural electrification, improved roads, and land-grant universities with their county extension offices, the broader movement was hobbled by its mildly paternalistic structure: concerned city people making helpful suggestions on how country people could improve their lot. Inevitably, much of it came down to a simple formula: look and behave more like the city.

If there is a phenomenon of rural resentment, its locus is here: the prevailing sentiment that through force of numbers and a sense of superiority, the City is bossing the Country. The rhetoric of recently-ousted congressman Tim Huelskamp, who represents our predominantly rural district in Kansas, plays to this dichotomy. In one email to constituents, Congressman Huelskamp writes that “farm programs deserve less Washington control, regulation and cost” (Dec.17, 2013). In other words, the Capital should stop telling us rural Districts what to do. It has been a long-standing fantasy of some rural areas to create new, rural-dominated states, like eastern Washington and Oregon and their sometimes dream of “Cascadia,” a state (or maybe a country) split from their urban coastlines to determine its own future.

But contra narratives of rural resentment and decline is the simple fact that, despite 100 years of concern and a pervasive sense of crisis, rural communities persist. We’re still here. What’s more, people still choose to live in the country. We like our yards and gardens and chickens. We like knowing our neighbors. Sure, some people are trapped in rural areas by poverty and bad choices. But this is hardly any different from the ways people get trapped in urban blight or suburban sprawl. Poverty, not rurality, holds people back.

There’s a competing narrative, one testified to by the simple fact of the enduring presence of thriving rural communities. It’s the narrative of rural joy. People actually choose rural, and this in the face of centuries-deep currents tugging populations to the city.

One place I’ve seen this choice play out is in the surprising wave of youngish pastors called to serve rural congregations in my own Western District Conference of Mennonite Church USA. These are women and men in their thirties who have made an intentional commitment to rural ministry, often after significant experiences in the big city and overseas. They’ve tended their rural congregations–congregations bearing a profound sense of both loss and possibility–and harvested surprising fruits of transformation and revival. This past spring, I led a session interviewing a number of these pastors at a conference on the rural church held in Beatrice, NE.

In describing their dreams for rural church and community, many of these pastors hit agrarian notes of care for the land, the value of work, and the preeminence of local community. They’re committed to the life and health of place. Like Jacob, fleeing his brother Esau’s wrath and searching for a bride (Gen. 28), they’ve discovered that “the Lord is in this place, and I did not know it!” They’ve come to recognize, like generations of rural folks before them, that no place is “in the middle of nowhere.” It’s all somewhere to God.

These are signs of joy, markers pointing toward a very different narrative than that of rural decline and resentment. We like it out here. We choose the rural life.

We claim Psalm 65:13, rural praise lifted to the God who embraces the whole earth: “The meadows clothe themselves with flocks, the valleys deck themselves with grain, they shout and sing together for joy.”

Previous Post

October 11, 2016

An October psalm

Next Post

October 27, 2016 4 reasons I'm not endorsing a candidate from the pulpit

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month January 2023 November 2022 May 2022 April 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 April 2021 March 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of him"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul James Peter John

Books by This Author Books by Brad Roth

See All Titles »