Do We Matter in Particular?

Last updated on: March 7, 2013 at 10:29 pm by Matthew Tan

Do We Matter in Particular? 2013-03-07T22:29:00+10:00 Matthew Tan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

An excellent post on despair on Catholic Kung Fu, written by Marquette University’s Anne Carpenter, prompts a reader to think about what the economy of salvation actually involves, and our particular place in that economy.

Many a Church-goer would be familiar about that most basic Scriptural narrative, God loved the world so much that he gave his only Son (John 3:16) and in his Son the whole universe obtains salvation.

“Maybe for the world and the cosmos”, some might quietly reply. “But what about me? Where is the evidence of this cosmic transformation in the grains of my own individual existence? Or is this concern for salvation in the particularities of my own life a narcissistic concern for things that do not really matter in the greater scheme of things? Will I only start to matter when my earthly existence ends?”

It is easy to think of oneself as the recipient of God’s transformative power when times are good or when such power is demonstrated in extraordinary circumstances. Such times however, are so rare, and the experience of trauma or bitter disappointment so frequent, that one might wonder if as the norm he or she could ever be the specific recipient of anything beyond the Cross, whether any specific consolation is the reserve for that one in particular. It is easy to think in such circumstances that God’s salvation and mercy is as the norm the special reserve of more “universal” and thus more important things like “creation” or “humankind”, and not any human in particular. After all, many might say, Isaiah did write that “all mankind is grass…the grass withers and the flower wilts” (Isa 40:8).

For far too many Christians, when it comes to the operations of God, it almost seems a divine mandate that one’s own life be regarded secondary to the seemingly greater good of all of creation, as if the particularities of one’s own existence stands in the way of the universal impact of God’s grace. Whilst the love of self can disrupt the economy of grace, as Augustine of Hippo reminds us, one must wonder if there necessarily has to be a dichotomy between one’s particular circumstances and the transformation of creation in its entirety. To put it in more abstract terms, is the particular necessarily separate from and subordinate to the universal?

A response could be glimpsed from an interview with Adrian Pabst on the Mars Hill Audio Journal. Speaking on Platonist metaphysics, Pabst sought to point out that the dichotomy between the universal (or “forms”) and the particular (“appearances”) which is often attributed to Plato is more the result of caricature than analysis. What an analysis of Plato’s metaphysics should reveal, argues Pabst, is that the universals must spill over ecstatically into the particular, so that the particular becomes a real manifestation of the universal.

And as students will learn in medieval philosophy at Campion College, the Christian faith grows out of this neoplatonic foundation. It is what underpins our understanding of the sacramental life, and that life is also what undergirds the Christian view of the world and God’s relationship to it. The economy of grace is not confined to some abstract universal, but will spill over and seep into every fibre of the particular. The first creation account in the book of Genesis was meant to show that the God of the Hebrews transcended the particular. And still, the patriarchs, the prophets and the psalms show time and time again that it was through one particular life that the universality of God’s operations unfolds (God lifted up Abraham out of obscurity, a nation out of slavery, a poor man from the dungheap).

A similar picture appears in the Gospels. The seemingly abstract gloss of God “saving each and every one of us” cannot ignore the fact that the particulars of “each” and “one” is bound up in the meaning of the sentence. In announcing the Kingdom of Heaven, Jesus not only announced a schema of commandments called for by the new universal sovereign. The universal sovereign’s version of salvation involved stooping down to pick mud up to smear on the eyes of a blind man, lifting a girl out of death, healing a hemorrhage through the hem of his cloak. Even in the passion, one must not forget that it is through the particularity of a wooden cross and a body of a 30 year old Hebrew that salvation of the whole cosmos came about. This logic continues in our sacramental life, especially in the Eucharist, when the universal Lord is fully manifest in a particular piece of bread which is then consumed by a particular body, entering through the gates of an individual’s mouth.

This means that, in the operations of salvation, particulars do matter, and as such, we matter in particular. A God who has an account for “every hair on your head” will not leave the beneficiaries of his grace to something as abstract as a universal, since the universal unfolds itself in the particulars of our existence. Thus, while creation “groans in waiting for manifestations of the Son of God” (Rom 8:19), while we rightfully wait for the salvation of the world, each one also rightfully makes this expectant claim “restore me again to health and give me life” (Isaiah 38:16). The salvation of the former cannot avoid that of the latter.

Augustine

bible

http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post

philosophy

Previous Post

February 27, 2013

Ratzinger and Liturgy: The Cosmos and Facing East

Next Post

March 14, 2013 Francis...What's to a Name?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category architecture art Augustine Belloc Benedict XVI bible blogs books bourgeois Christianity Campion College Chesterton Christianisation Church and Culture Church Fathers citizen conference conservative consumer culture cybernetics Desert Fathers discipleship distributism drinking ecclesiology economics education environment Evagrius of Pontus formation Foucault George Weigel Girard Graham Ward http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post interfaith Jacques Ellul John Chrysostom Julia Kristeva Latin liturgy mall marriage monasticism Music Narrative news philosophy polis politics pop culture postmodern city postsecular prayer prostestant quote Quotes Radical Orthodoxy resources Rome Rule of St. Benedict saint Saints secular sociology theological anthropology theology transcendance Uncategorized videos William Cavanaugh

Select a Month December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 October 2009 February 2008 December 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What foreign power destroyed Jerusalem, ending the kingdom of Judah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Egypt Assyria Persia Babylon