On Deconstruction & Salvation

Last updated on: May 18, 2012 at 4:43 am by Matthew Tan

On Deconstruction & Salvation 2012-05-18T04:43:00+10:00 Matthew Tan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Postmodern” is a dirty word for Christians. In many parts of Christendom, it is associated with relativism, individualism and the jettisoning of tradition for the sake of the new or kitsch (sometimes justifiably so from personal experiences).

But as James KA Smith cogently suggested in his Who’s Afraid of Postmodernism: Taking Derrida, Lyotard & Foucault to Church, postmodernism can actually be a counterpoint for the deeply modern committments of many Christians, be they Neo-cons or even those who think they are maintaining Christian tradition merely by sticking with traditional lines of thought. Indeed, postmodernism can actually provide the idiom to the recovery of the ancient treasures of the Church in a way that is not assured either by liberal or seemingly conservative factions.

An example given by Matthew Tan at a Formal Hall presentation at Campion College this week was the deconstructive project of Jacques Derrida and the power of Scripture and the Liturgy. With all the enthusiasm with deconstruction as such, what often gets ignored in Derrida’s project is the notion of treating the text as a subject rather than an object. If a text is treated as an object, it is often treated as something to be controlled, something whose meaning is sucked out by the reader for his own purposes. At the risk of oversimplification, if a text is treated as a subject however, the reader treats the text as if it was another person. As a subject, the text would be resistant to the readers attempts to control and indeed “push back” against the reader, so much so that in the process of reading, the reader could actually become read by the text just as much as the reader is reading the text. This decentering of the reader becomes one of the buttresses of the deconstructive project, where Derrida hopes to bring into the center of the reader’s attention marginalised voices – migrants, the colonised and women to name a few – voices that could be rendered mute from conventional frameworks of meaning.

Such themes may seem so foreign to Christian practice as to be worthy of nothing but indifference, if not scorn, but is such a treatment called for. Why is the notion of the “text as subject” so foreign when, in the reading of Scripture, what we should be coming to know is not a set of rules, but the person of Jesus, the subject to end all subjects? After all, was it not Jesus himself who on the road to Emmaus, explained to the disciples in the Scriptures “all things concerning himself” (Luke 24:27)?

Thus, the reading of scripture is the reading of Jesus. The reading of Scripture is also at the same time a call by Jesus to co-abide in Him (John 15:7). Is the process of co-abiding in Jesus not a transformative one for the one abiding, as St. John of the Cross indicated in his Dark Night of the Soul? If so, why can this not be a deconstructive process? In the process of reading the Scriptures, what gets deconstructed is not the text, but the reader. The reading of scripture is deconstructive because it brings a marginalised voice to the center, the voice of Jesus Christ. For if we are really honest, who can really say for certain that it is voice of Christ at the centre of one’s life in the world? Can we be certain that it is not the voice industry, commerce and power posing as Christ? Christ did caution us against false Christs who speak in his name, claiming “I am He” (Luke 21:8).

In this bringing of Christ back to the centre, what gets deconstructed in the reader is the false sense of self. For if we think we are sure of ourselves, suggests Augustine, it is a sure sign of a false self. In the embrace of Christ, elements of a false self fall away – be it the self that thinks he is sure of himself, the self that thinks he is better than others, or the self that thinks that he is right before God.

But a Christian deconstruction goes beyond Derrida’s version, in that while the idols of a false self fade away in the illumination by Christ, that same illumination does not obliterate the self. Rather, deconstruction in the light of Christ brings to light the true self, the self that manifests the imago Dei. As the marginalised voice of Jesus becomes louder in the reading of Scripture, we are reminded of not only what we are, but what we are called to be, nothing less than a part of the Body of the Risen Christ.

Postscript: Australian readers might be interested to know that James KA Smith will be presenting a series of lectures at New College in the University of New South Wales between 22nd and 26th May on the theme “Imagining the Kingdom: On Christian Action”. For details, please click here.

Previous Post

May 15, 2012

A Theological Response to Ecological Disaster

Next Post

May 29, 2012 Food Fight: The Story of a Goulburn Valley Food Co-Operative

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category architecture art Augustine Belloc Benedict XVI bible blogs books bourgeois Christianity Campion College Chesterton Christianisation Church and Culture Church Fathers citizen conference conservative consumer culture cybernetics Desert Fathers discipleship distributism drinking ecclesiology economics education environment Evagrius of Pontus formation Foucault George Weigel Girard Graham Ward http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#post interfaith Jacques Ellul John Chrysostom Julia Kristeva Latin liturgy mall marriage monasticism Music Narrative news philosophy polis politics pop culture postmodern city postsecular prayer prostestant quote Quotes Radical Orthodoxy resources Rome Rule of St. Benedict saint Saints secular sociology theological anthropology theology transcendance Uncategorized videos William Cavanaugh

Select a Month December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 October 2009 February 2008 December 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Bethesda" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

House of mercy House of olives House of bread House of wind