Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Gossip, Rumor and Superstition

Gossip, Rumor and Superstition

Last updated on: February 19, 2021 at 9:47 am by Darrell Lackey

Gossip, Rumor and Superstition 2021-02-19T09:47:24-08:00 Darrell Lackey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What are we to make of these reports: see here and here? What does it tell us about evangelical discipleship and training? What should the pastor of a typical or average evangelical church take away from these reports? How should it make them feel? Yes, I get it. What if the pastor/priest believes the same sort of nonsense?

We live in a very peculiar time. We think, of course, we are modern people—and we are in a certain sense. We have personal computers and phones, the likes of which dwarf the initial electronic computing capabilities of, for instance, NASA. And yet, we have intelligent people who believe things that amount to nothing more than rank superstition.

Social media didn’t create the phenomenon that goes back, no doubt, to the dawn of communities, but it has certainly amplified it. That phenomenon is the power of gossip, rumor, and superstition to move people. Those who grew up living in town, in track housing, probably remember their parent(s) periodically talking to their neighbors over the fence.

Even now, for those of us who as adults live in track housing, we no doubt experience the same. If one lived in the country, it was often the neighbor stopping their car and speaking to people in their yards, on the porch, or even side-to-side in their cars on some back road. My point is that social media is much the same phenomena, except for the exponential growth/size of the neighborhood and the fact we don’t know everyone as well or at all.

The problem is that much of what was shared was gossip, rumor, and superstition. Hopefully, one had rational and honest neighbors. But there is something about sharing informally, over the fence, in semi-privacy—that sort of allows a lot of embellished information to mix with the true. Most people don’t mean any harm and most know to take what they hear with a grain of salt. After all, just like the game telephone, we know what we’re hearing has already passed through several recountings.

However, sometimes it is harmful. In 1692, in Salem Massachusetts, three girls, between the ages of 9 and 11, blamed a black woman, a homeless woman, and an older poor woman for their “odd” behavior. It speaks rather tellingly that they chose those three. What (superstitions—no doubt) had they heard from their parents, or in church, or from their neighbors about such people?

What started in Salem soon spread throughout the region. Before it was all said and done, here was the result:

“Governor Phipps…eventually pardoned all who were in prison on witchcraft charges by May 1693. But the damage had been done: 19 were hanged on Gallows Hill, a 71-year-old man was pressed to death with heavy stones, several people died in jail and nearly 200 people, overall, had been accused of practicing ‘the Devil’s magic.'”

Looking back, we might, out of our supposed modern sophistication and scientific understanding think to ourselves, “Wow, what ignorance and superstition.” And yet, here we are. What was the storming of the Capitol on January 6th but the culmination of the very same forces that produced the Salem Witch Trials?

Conspiracy theories and cults like Qanon exist, at least partly, due to gossip, rumor, and superstition. Another example is the “pizza-gate,” story back in 2016. The entire story was based upon online rumor and gossip, started by a completely anonymous source. This “source” conned people into believing total nonsense based on the deciphering of supposed coded messages in emails about pizza.

Which then led to this:

“On Oct. 28, 2017, someone calling himself “Q” and claiming to be a high-ranking intelligence officer began posting on 4chan. The messages expanded on Pizzagate by claiming satanic pedophiles controlled not only Comet [name of the restaurant] but the world, drinking children’s blood to stay young. Q promised that Trump and other government insiders would bring them to justice.”

Guess what: Anyone can claim to be a “high-ranking intelligence officer,” on the internet. I could. You could. And, if perhaps we had served in the military or were total military nerds (think Tom Clancy fans) and spent years reading about such, we could probably convince quite a few people we were for real. We could speak the language.

Here’s the problem: So what. There’s no way of knowing if such a source is who they say they are, or has actual proof of their claims, without some way of verifying it beyond their mere word for it. Who would believe such a person, especially someone making such outrageous claims, based upon their word alone? There has to be outside, objective verification.

Most of us know our neighbors fairly well, depending obviously upon a number of factors. If we knew our neighbor to be rational, intelligent, and sane—and they were to then tell us the Q story over the fence one afternoon, we might believe them. We would be sure to ask them how they knew such and the evidence for it, but we might be open to the story.

But who would believe such when it’s coming originally from some random person on the internet they don’t know, nor know anything about, except what the person tells them? Well, apparently, many would. What does that tell us about the critical thinking skills, logic, and rationality of many in our nation?

For some reason, we have almost an entire generation of people, both old and young, who think if it’s online, on some electronic device, it’s different than what a neighbor might tell them over the backyard fence, over the phone, or in a coffee shop. And not only believe it but hold it strongly enough to commit violence. But guess what? There is no difference. It’s just gossip, rumor, and hearsay. To act on it, certainly violently, is to leave all reason and ethics behind.

We are now living through our own Salem Witch Hunts-Trials. A Q follower might respond, “Well, witches don’t exist, but pedophiles do.” True. But every decent, rational and ethical person is against such already—in fact, they are against any harm to a child. Clearly, there is something else going on here. Most people don’t need to believe an irrational, nonsensical, and bonkers conspiracy theory to be against human trafficking or harm to children.

No, the Q conspiracy theory exists for other reasons, these primarily: To demonize those who disagree with them politically and to promote white nationalism. The, “But, the children!” clutching their pearls part is just to con the simple, anger them, and exploit our natural bent to protect children.

People that harm children do obviously exist. It’s why we have laws. But there is no compelling or legitimate evidence a global cabal of powerful people as described by Q exists, or participates in the type of activities they are accused (the equivalent of which is: “They’re witches!”). It’s a superstition at this point; it’s part of an anti-Semitic slander that goes back, at least, to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the blood libel myth.

Here we are. It’s 2021 and many of us “modern” people are as ignorant and superstitious as the people in the 17th Century who hunted and killed “witches.” And who has time for actual research and learning when we can just listen to gossip and rumor over the back fence, or, in our time, through social media/non recognized or respected internet sources. It’s the new back fence, party telephone line, or hair salon/barber shop.

Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr was right: The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Here’s something that hasn’t changed: “You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man to be a malicious witness.” Exodus 23:1

I have a Patreon Page—please consider supporting my writing.

Previous Post

February 6, 2021

The Privilege of Silence

Next Post

March 6, 2021 Discipleship by Proxy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 May 2024 January 2024 November 2023 September 2023 July 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul offer to do if Onesimus owes Philemon anything?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Pay it back himself Forgive the debt Pray for resolution Have the church pay it