Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Obsess Much?

Obsess Much?

Last updated on: September 27, 2020 at 10:40 am by Darrell Lackey

Obsess Much? 2020-09-27T10:40:42-07:00 Darrell Lackey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I don’t normally engage other Patheos contributors, but sometimes, just for fun, I like any readers to experience my poor choices in real time. Consider this a work of translation with commentary. Here we go:

“Progressives keep promising conservative evangelicals they’ll be our friends if only we stop harping on sex and serve people. The problem is that every time evangelicals try to serve people, progressives want to harp on sex.”

Translation: We don’t see this as a discrimination issue, but as something having to do with…sex. (Irony meter needle just moved a bit).

Oh, and we never promised friendship. No, we promised the unconditional love one still maintains for the ignorant uncle/cousin/sibling that shows up each Thanksgiving to drunkenly regale us with their insight—that, my friend, you certainly have. You’re welcome.

The writer then goes on to talk about Franklin Graham, Samaritan’s Purse, and their medical charity work in New York during the Covid-19 outbreak. He’s upset that the media and other critics were suspicious of their work because of their views toward the LGBT community (Let’s just say…not affirming). He’s upset these critics thought Samaritan’s work might then be biased or prejudiced against that community. He notes:

“The substance behind all this sound and fury was, of course, the fact that Samaritan’s Purse holds a traditional Christian view of sex and marriage and requires its members to subscribe to that view. One does not have to be a fan of Franklin Graham’s political activism (I am not) to see how overwrought this objection is. It amounts to a demand that Christianity as all churches have understood it until the last few years be expunged from public life.”

Translation: Just because we don’t accept those people as (Fill in the blank) or feel they should have the same rights as we do, and have felt that way for centuries, that doesn’t mean we would actually treat them differently.

Exactly. I mean, why in the world would anyone think such a thing? After all, analogically, just because many white people have viewed black people differently for centuries, thought them inferior, and felt they shouldn’t have the same rights as themselves, they have never, ever, actually treated them differently, right? Right. Got it. Makes perfect sense.

Seriously though (Stepping back into reality), the criticism doesn’t amount to expunging anything. It amounts to believing that when a group says they do not believe a certain segment of humanity should have the same rights, or be treated the same as their group, we should take them at their word. We should believe them. Thus, we should also monitor them because they may in fact discriminate. Logic. History. Stuff like that.

Moving on:

“It is an obsession with sexual issues bordering on paranoia—a John Nash-level fixation not content for Christians to quietly do good work in a community while keeping their views to themselves. No, this progressive pharisaism considers the mere touch—nay—the presence of Christians with aberrant sexual beliefs as infectious; more so even than the pandemic Samaritan’s Purse spent months fighting.”

Translation: We don’t like being called out, or monitored for, our prejudice or discriminatory beliefs and practices, which are based on…wait for it… “an obsession with sexual issues bordering on paranoia…”

The poor writer doesn’t seem to realize that others pointing out discriminatory beliefs and practices and their criticism of such, has nothing to do with sex in general, gender, marriage, or sexual orientation. It has to do with treating people fairly (whatever the underlying issue) and making sure those who don’t believe in doing that, in fact, do it anyway. It is the writer who has made this about sex, not the critics.

Still more:

“There are two lessons we should learn from this spectacle. The first is that all the op-eds calling on evangelicals to drop the culture wars and get down to the real business of serving people were so much smoke-blowing. Christians have served people in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic—spectacularly and selflessly, in fact—and progressives still hate us.”

Well, “hate” is a strong word. Pity’s more like it. Christians have, indeed, served people in the midst of this pandemic. That they have done so, is in spite of, not because of, any discriminatory, prejudiced, or hurtful beliefs held by some of them. Again, by analogy, imagine we were to find that a clinic set up by a white supremacy group had not discriminated against black people. Are we to now praise them for that? Ummm…no. Would we have monitored such a group? You bet. Inhale that smoke.

Finally:

“The real demand here is not that we stop obsessing over sex but that we conform our beliefs about sex to the new political orthodoxies. This we cannot do…”

Translation: What we want is for people to conform to our political orthodoxies, which are discriminatory, unfair, ignorant, hurtful, and…wait for it…obsessed over sex (My irony meter needle is now spinning wildly).

The writer needs to understand the difference between those who obsess over discrimination, unfairness, prejudice, and a destructive intolerance, and those who obsess over sex. In his post, he clearly reveals which one he’s obsessed with. I doubt that was his intent, but, oh well. Paging Dr. Freud.

I have a Patreon Page—please consider supporting my writing.

Previous Post

September 19, 2020

Open Bibles—Open Minds

Next Post

October 8, 2020 I’m Not Voting for A Politician

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 May 2024 January 2024 November 2023 September 2023 July 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian symbol looks like a fish and spells "ichthys" in Greek?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The triangle The anchor The Jesus Fish The dove