Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Is Separating the Gospel from Social Justice a Sign of White Privilege?

Is Separating the Gospel from Social Justice a Sign of White Privilege?

Last updated on: July 9, 2020 at 3:00 pm by Darrell Lackey

Is Separating the Gospel from Social Justice a Sign of White Privilege? 2020-07-09T15:00:02-07:00 Darrell Lackey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’m suspicious. When I read or hear something put out by those most critical of the social justice movement, I often wonder if the true reasons for their opposition are more cultural than theological.

There are obvious reasons I’m suspicious. The overwhelming number of voices critical of social justice are white, male, and evangelical/fundamentalist. Here is a good example. The great majority have rarely, if ever, had to deal with the same cultural, social, political and economic issues as their non-white or female counter parts.

In their minds, I think most of these voices genuinely believe they are defending the “gospel.” However, I’m just not sure what “gospel” they mean. Yes, I know they think it the “historic” gospel, but the churches with much longer traditions (Eastern Orthodox for example) than theirs, would certainly not agree with their view of “historic,” let alone their view of the gospel.

Besides, a gospel that is only about avoiding a future hell isn’t good news for those already living in one. The question remains: Why the need to pull them apart, to dichotomize gospel and social justice? Those defending the priority of the gospel, of course, talk about the need for works of mercy, charity, and justice. However, they want to make sure we don’t identify those works as the gospel, but as the result of the gospel.

Is this for fear of a works-based salvation? It shouldn’t be. Those who think social justice is intrinsic to the gospel also believe we are saved by grace; or, at the least don’t try and separate grace and works—in other words, they believe both James (2:17) and Paul. They also see the gospel, salvation, and social justice in the light of Matthew 25:31-46.

Is it for fear we will no longer evangelize, and simply be decent people who side with the least of these and work for justice? Interesting. What if being decent people who cared (in action, not just sentiment) about the least of these, turned out to be true evangelism? Regardless, this is hardly a valid fear.

Is it based on the idea we must change hearts before we can change culture and law? They certainly don’t believe that when it comes to abortion or the LGBT community. They don’t seem to believe it when it comes to illegal immigration or religious liberty issues. In these areas, it’s all about legislating and law—hearts be damned.

They do seem to believe this (hearts before laws) when it comes to social justice, racism, and sexism though. Here, rather than the law, they believe hearts need to change first. While non-white communities and women suffer, lament, and protest, they would rather talk about hearts than laws. Interesting. Why is that?

Is it the fear that “social justice” is some sort of code for leftist or progressive politics? Is it the long-held fear of Marxism and Communism? If so, I suppose something predicated upon battles played out in the 1940s and 1950s is what happens when so many people are that out of touch with the present moment. The past is all they have.

There is a reason non-white communities were much more open to leftist political and economic thought, especially prior to the 1970s. Many did not feel included or able to participate within a white world of political and economic domination. It’s hard to feel “free,” when one begins to learn (Jim Crow) the entire system is weighted against them.

In my opinion, I do think the true issue is white privilege. I would answer my query in the affirmative. I think the reason these voices want to separate the gospel and social justice is because the great majority of them have rarely experienced a life where social justice was an issue or needed.

Adding (in their minds) social justice to the gospel complicates the current formula and brings a haunting and, no doubt, unwanted sting to the conscience. Rather than a simple prayer and cognitive theological affirmation, it requires seeing the world from the perspective of the least of these. It requires living and working toward a world where the “least” become fewer and fewer.

As long as we can keep the gospel and salvation in the abstract, in some metaphysical/spiritual location, where they initially don’t touch this life, then we never really have to change. We never have to work toward making the good news concrete for those who suffer in this life, while we, too often, rest comfortably waiting for heaven.

But to keep the gospel and social justice together means acknowledging white privilege. It means understanding how we were (are) part of the machinery creating the “least of these,” to begin with, the very ones upon which our salvation now depends (Oh, the irony). They are, after all, Jesus. Whatever we did for them (or didn’t do), we did for Jesus (Matt 25:40).

For far too many in this life, a gospel separated from social justice is not good news. If it’s not good news for all of us, then it’s not genuinely good news for any of us. It’s a truncated gospel—a gospel too small.

Here is how Jesus described the gospel—the good news:

And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up. And as was his custom, he went to the synagogue on the Sabbath day, and he stood up to read. And the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written,

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,

because he has anointed me

to proclaim good news to the poor.

He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives

and recovering of sight to the blind,

to set at liberty those who are oppressed,

to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.”

And he rolled up the scroll and gave it back to the attendant and sat down. And the eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed on him. And he began to say to them, “Today this Scripture has been fulfilled in your hearing.” (Luke 4:16-21)

If one takes the entire Biblical narrative as a whole and not just proof texts from St. Paul’s writings, there is no separation of the gospel and social justice. And if one is longing for justice, then such is easy to see. If one is not, then the gospel is first, an abstract concept about salvation; secondly, it’s a ticket to a future heaven, and only tertiary about our actual life here and now. But only a person with little worries in this life can afford to view it that way, to see the gospel and social justice as separate.

The rest don’t have that privilege.

I have a Patreon Page—please consider supporting my writing.

Previous Post

June 22, 2020

Evangelicals Are Attracted to Conspiracy Theories—Why?

Next Post

July 15, 2020 Biblical Justice is Social Justice

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 May 2024 January 2024 November 2023 September 2023 July 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What city’s walls fell after the Israelites marched around them?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Babylon Jericho Jerusalem Nineveh