Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

divergence

We Are Sheep-We Are Goats

Last updated on: April 19, 2020 at 11:40 am   by Darrell Lackey

We Are Sheep-We Are Goats 2020-04-19T11:40:01-07:00 Darrell Lackey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the Christian narrative we find the picture of humans and their response to God (lived lives) portrayed by the categories of sheep or goats.  There are positive connotations associated with sheep and negative ones with goats.  For example, we have Matthew 25 regarding the, “Final Judgment.”  We read:

“When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, then he will sit on his glorious throne. Before him will be gathered all the nations, and he will separate people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. And he will place the sheep on his right, but the goats on the left.”

Those on the right, the sheep, are told to come and inherit the Kingdom. Those on the left do not fare as well. Or, at least this is the common understanding of these verses.  The sheep are bound for heaven, while the goats to eternal perdition.  One is either a sheep or a goat, there is no in-between. Two groups. Very simple. Very black and white.  You know, the way most of us like our theology.

And yet, I wonder. So too did Sergius Bulgakov. There are alternative readings to what we call the “final judgment,” or the end times.  Bulgakov offered such a reading, which I find compelling and closer to the over-all sweep of Scripture, the Christian narrative, and of the God portrayed therein.

What partly formed his reading of Matthew 25 and the sheep and the goats, was his view of what “judgment” entailed and meant.  We normally view judgment as something happening outside ourselves. We stand before an external judge who makes a decision regarding our lives, our souls.  It is something handed down to us, rendered or decreed.  It is separate from our own judgment, reflection, or internal calculus.

Bulgakov saw it differently.  He saw an encounter with Christ at the final judgment as a moment of self-judgment, an internal awakening and revelation.  To stand before Christ was to see and understand, for the first time, the gulf, the chasm, the distance between who we were and who he is.  It is a self-realization of profound depth. One looks in the mirror and finally all pretense, all falseness, all the masks, excuses, defenses, and every partition of hiding are all now gone in the light of Christ’s presence.  We are completely naked and see ourselves for the first time.

When we internally experience the brute realization of what we are, with what we see in Christ, therein is our judgment.  This doesn’t mean we subjectively decide our own personal judgment or fate.  In fact, for the first time, we will have a purely objective, honest, real, and true view of ourselves. If we now have even a glimmer of self-awareness or ability to reflect, such should give us considerable pause.

I would imagine we will be undone. It will be in that moment, we, like David, will learn we are the “man.”  We who cried, “Who did this?!” “Who is responsible for this?!” will learn that we did this, we are responsible.  No more need be said. No external judgment can compare to the one that comes within and is now in agreement with the universe, love, the Trinity.  The truth.

With that understanding of the final judgment, Bulgakov interprets the sheep and goats in Matthew 25.  We read of the separation of people.  When we think of the evils that have befallen humankind, they are almost always preceded by the separation of people. We categorize and designate the “other.” We decide who is “in” and who is “out.” All prejudice, much mistreatment and injustice, begins by the separation of people.  This happens first in our hearts and then too often becomes a physical reality, enforced in either custom or law.

However, Bulgakov saw the separation happening in Matthew 25 not as a physical separation of people, but as a separation that happens internally, in our spirit and soul.  We are each a sheep and a goat, all at once. We might say each will burn in hell and also experience the sublime heavens. Or, put another way, we will all stand before Christ. We read:

“The separation of the sheep and the goats, with their final destinies, is a figure that refers not to individual persons or groups of persons but, above all, to their inner state. The possibility of heaven and hell is present in every soul, although to different degrees. This is a horizontal division that passes through all humankind, not a vertical one, which would separate it into two mutually impenetrable parts…Therefore, the idea of two humankinds, divided and separated from each other at the Last Judgment, does not correspond to the fullness and connectedness of reality. Humankind is one. It is one in Adam and one is Christ…” (Pg. 515—The Bride of the Lamb)

These interpretive understandings along with others are, no doubt, what partly inclined Bulgakov toward universalism.  What is it that we fear with such interpretations and understandings? Do we fear we are interpreting incorrectly, or is it something more?

I would imagine most of us want an outward judgment based upon locating a moment in time when we were “saved,” or upon some outward, physical act like baptism or a good life. It must be somewhat unnerving to consider our judgment might be the inner revealing of who we really are, which is to say both a sheep and a goat.  Further, that being such is a “line” running through every heart.  As Alexander Solzhenitsyn reminded us:

“The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either — but right through every human heart — and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained.”

Again, we will all stand before Christ.  This is our judgment; this is our heaven and hell. We will then realize we are sheep and goats, we are saved and lost, all at once. Thus, we pray, Lord have mercy.

I have a Patreon Page—please consider supporting my writing.

Uncategorized

Bulgakov

End Times

Eschatology

Heaven and Hell

Judgment

Matthew 25

Previous Post



April 7, 2020

Presumption not Faith

Next Post



May 9, 2020 We Are All Monastics Now


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 May 2024 January 2024 November 2023 September 2023 July 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Elisha purified a pot of stew that had been poisoned with what?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Arsenic Wild Gourds Wild Mushrooms Bad Cheese

Related posts from Divergence

Progressive Christian

How Evangelicals Got “Counter-Culture” All Wrong

Divergence

Progressive Christian

Speaking Truth to Power: Budde and Trump

Divergence

Progressive Christian

The Late Great Hal Lindsey

Divergence

Progressive Christian

Trumpism, MAGA, is a Revived Paganism

Divergence

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

Did Ancient China Once Worship the God of...

Across human history, a common thread weaves through the origins of the...

Love Your Neighbor – Including Earth-Kin: Lev. 19,...

God’s command to love your neighbor means acting in an ethical and...

Lead a Church Study of “Jesus and Lao...

Guest writer Jack Thomas (The Irreverent Reverend) reflects on leading his church...

Principles for Understanding the Apostolic Ministry Today

Whenever people discover that my formal ministry title is "apostle," as in...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube