Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Elusive Indeed

Elusive Indeed

Last updated on: July 22, 2019 at 11:38 am by Darrell Lackey

Elusive Indeed 2019-07-22T11:38:13-07:00 Darrell Lackey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I don’t know Mark Galli, but I like much of what he writes. I can’t speak for him, but in his writings, I sense a leaning toward Eastern Orthodoxy/Anglicanism, which is where I find myself these days. He is, in my view, hardly a typical evangelical. He is clearly aware of the problems in that world. I’m not sure he sees them deeply enough to leave that tradition, but who knows what the end of the day might bring? Perhaps a Trump second term would do it?

Anyway, I bring your attention to this series of essays by Mr. Galli. Like with most things, it’s a mixed bag. I can say that, over-all, I found myself agreeing with much more than I disagreed with. He certainly is moving along the edge, the fringe of evangelical thought, especially when it comes to the concept of being “missional.” However, while I did find myself agreeing with much of his line of thought, his over-arching theological narrative, I did disagree with many of the conclusions he drew.

This was true especially when it came to this essay. His main point is noted here:

“My reading of the sweep of the biblical picture, then, is that the purpose of the church—the family of God—is not to make the world a better place, but to invite the world into the better place, the place called church.”

While I agree the Church, the Body of Christ, is an end and not a means, I have a problem with the idea the visible church, whether in the form of an institution, convention, denomination, tradition, theology, or local body is necessarily a “better” place. Further, a small thing, but Galli seems to undercut his contra to the purpose of being “missional” when he asserts the purpose of the Church is to, “invite [emphasis added] the world into [this] better place…”

Beyond that, I don’t understand how his reasoning here leads him to believe that if we were to get his thinking across to evangelical Christians (or his target audience), it would not lead to making the world a better place. Rather, I would argue, the fact the Church is an end and not a means, if believed and internalized, would indeed lead to a better world. I don’t see how they are mutually exclusive. Is he making an argument against those Christians, movements and traditions who emphasize social justice as intrinsic to the gospel and the Christian life?

Moving on, we come to the part in the essay where Galli attempts to address those passages in the Bible seeming to teach that the Church does, indeed, exist for the sake of the world. I don’t have a problem with his interpretation of some of those passages, such as the Great Commission passage in Matthew 28, or his views regarding the calling of Abraham and the creation of Israel. I think he is correct to note how those passages do not necessarily teach what evangelicals assume they do.

However, when he comes to the “least of these” passage in Matthew 25, I strongly disagree. He, like many others, believes this passage is telling us the “least of these” are Christians only. I have addressed that issue here. I think he is entirely wrong in his interpretation.

Of course, even Galli must know the entire sweep and arc of Scripture and the Judeo-Christian narrative is one that strongly supports the necessity of social justice. So, he does qualify his assertions and tells us he will circle back to address this arc later:

“…one can hardly deny the need for Christians to work for justice in society. Any Christian whose heart does not break over injustice, who does nothing to alleviate suffering in the world, is likely not a Christian in the first place. But we’ll come back to this.”

Okay. We’ll see. And that leads us to his next essay. From this one we read:

“[I’m] mostly making an argument that we’ve made an idol out of neighbor love at the expense of the first and greatest commandment.”

Let me get this straight: One day we appear before God and God is upset with us. We ask God, “God, why are you upset with us?” And God responds: “Because you loved people more than you loved me.” Does that sound like the God revealed in Jesus? God is love. And the person who does not love their neighbor in concrete action does not know or love God. We wish loving our neighbors was so out-of-control it was considered idolatry! We are far, far from such. Look around.

Rather, I would hope we hear: “Well done good and faithful servant for loving me, the image you recognized in your neighbor as you loved them too.”

Moving on, we read:

“My conclusion after surveying this biblical landscape is this: The church’s mission is not to go out and make the world a better place, to be a blessing, to transform culture, to bring justice to the earth, to work for human flourishing. The church’s destiny and purpose are to live together in love in Christ, to the praise of God’s glory. That, in fact, is the destiny of all humankind, no matter what corner of the globe they come from. Simply put: Rather than the world being the purpose for the church, the purpose of the world is to become the church.”

Again, this simply doesn’t need to be put this way. The conclusions do not line up with the theology nor the “biblical landscape.” They seem to be coming from somewhere else. Is this an attempt to walk some middle ground between evangelicals’ emphasis of evangelism as the primary mission, as opposed to progressive Christians who stress social justice?

Agreed, the Church’s destiny and purpose is union with the Holy Trinity, to live in love, all to God’s glory. However, as that happens, even in this time (secular) between the times, guess what? The world becomes a better place, it is blessed, culture is transformed, justice does take place and there is human flourishing. The Church’s mission should lead to all those things, otherwise, the Church is not being the Church—she is not following Jesus.

If the Church is loving God and seeking God above all else, if the Church would do and understand its purpose as Mr. Galli suggests, then all those things should follow.

Not only are his conclusions theologically suspect, they are unnecessary, misguided, and unhelpful. They are especially tone deaf to our current moment. Imagine white evangelical Christians in the 1960’s, especially in the South during the Civil Rights Movement, being told, “The church’s mission is not to go out and make the world a better place, to be a blessing, to transform culture, to bring justice to the earth, to work for human flourishing.”

Such would have been to completely throw under the bus the “least” and marginalized of those times (and presently!), specifically, people of color, and to aligned one’s self with the privileged and powerful. It is just as culturally and contextually tone deaf and irresponsible now, given the current occupant of the White House and our very present crisis situation. We would call it out then, and we should now.

There is almost a, “Church/Christian first” mentality running through these essays that is spookily similar to the, “America first” mentality. Might I suggest both are theologically faulty ideas, to say the least. The last thing we need right now is a theological justification for tribalism.

Love of God and love of neighbor, even enemies, are intrinsic to one another. We cannot separate them. God is imaged in our neighbor, even in our enemy.

If we exist for God, then we exist for our neighbor, our enemy, and the world. One cannot biblically, or without understanding orthodox theology, separate the two in their conclusions, unless of course, he has misunderstood both. It is this truth and others that elude Mr. Galli.

I have a Patreon Page—please consider supporting my writing.

Previous Post

June 26, 2019

Dancing in the Ruins

Next Post

August 3, 2019 The Way We Still Are

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 May 2024 January 2024 November 2023 September 2023 July 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days are in a week?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Seven Five Twelve Ten