Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Progressive Christian
Government Should Not be Run Like a Business

Government Should Not be Run Like a Business

Last updated on: March 14, 2019 at 9:40 pm by Darrell Lackey

Government Should Not be Run Like a Business 2019-03-14T21:40:04-07:00 Darrell Lackey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Something I’ve heard most of my life is a sentiment along the lines of, “Government should be run like a business, with balanced budgets, a savings or reserve, and efficiently/cost effectively.” The idea is that a “bottom-line” mentality should prevail. We look around at, say, Microsoft, or Starbucks, and we say, “See how successful they have been—we should run our governments like that!”

I’ve even heard church people say the “business” side of a church’s ministry should be run like a business. When it is pointed out that even the “business” side is not really about “business” or money, or profits, or cost effectiveness, such ideas are often lost on those who have been discipled more by Forbes than the Bible or Christian tradition and teaching.

None of this is to say that governments or churches shouldn’t be wise and thoughtful in how they handle money or their other more mundane and practical affairs, economic or otherwise. We are caretakers and stewards only, God being the true owner of everything as creator, but caretakers and stewards none the less.

What I do mean to say is we are making a category mistake when we say governments (or churches) should be run like businesses. While these all may be organizations, not all organizations are the same, exist for the same reasons, or have the same purpose or goals.

A business exists for the purposes of providing a product or service to people for a price they are willing to pay, wherein the business is able to profit, thus providing a living to the owner, employment to workers, and other benefits to the wider community. While there are philosophical and theological aspects to what “business” means and how it should be understood, both now and historically, it is tied intrinsically to the basic need of providing for one’s self and family.

Governments, however, do not exist for those reasons or have those same purposes. Obviously, there are many forms of government. There are also many philosophical and theological conceptions of government. I am speaking out of a Christian tradition and understanding. Fundamentally, governments exist to make judgments, and therein resides their authority. Oliver O’Donovan puts it thus:

“The authority of secular government resides in the practice of judgment…for the proposition that the authority of government resides essentially in the act of judgment, we must turn to the New Testament, where St. Paul described the function of civil authority as to reward the just and punish the evil (Rom. 13:4).” (Pgs. 1-3)

And O’Donovan isn’t using the term “secular” in its commonly understood sense, but in its truest sense, which is in terms of salvation history or time. He is speaking then to all governmental forms that exist in the time between the ascension of Christ and the summation of all things. Of course there is more to what government does, but in this understanding its intrinsic nature is the authority to judge. And making judgments entails much—there is a myriad and complex web of interlocking relationships, duties, and functions bound up in that very succinct description of government and its purpose.

The point is that judging between good and evil is not something businesses do on behalf of the citizens, the people, of which they themselves are a part. Making judgments entails philosophical and theological considerations. It entails having a deep understanding of jurisprudence historically, socially, politically, and in many other aspects. It must consider how judgments affect all of its citizens, regardless of any economic aspects, or other prejudices.

At a national level, those judgments have to do with protecting citizens, preventing or waging war, and other lethal or life and death matters. It means making judgments as to the social flourishing of its citizens and neighborly relations with the rest of the world. None of these types of decisions can be based on some “bottom line” or reduced to economic considerations alone—or anything purely practical.

Confusing the two also leads to America’s perpetual tendency to want business people (mostly men) to become political leaders. Or, the tendency of business leaders to think their prowess in one area will translate to the other. The idea seems to be that if a person has built a successful business, and become wealthy, he must then be a good leader. I think this logic rather faulty, but the greater problem is that it again confuses these two areas of endeavor and the type of leader best suited to each.

Further, we could add, the next best argument against this type of thinking or leader is the current occupant of the White House. Or course, in this case, one can’t even make the argument he was a successful business man. He is much closer to a con-man than a businessman and his supposed wealth (of which we know very little) was mostly gifted and the rest built upon BS and personal promotion. Still, he was able to present the persona of such and it was enough for low-information or lazy voters.

Business leaders tend, not all, but some, to be practical, bottom-line, types of people. Matters of state, or government, however, are often too complex for practical, bottom-line solutions. It is why the wisest states or cultures have selected statesmen (statespersons) and not politicians or business people to lead their governments. A statesperson is more a wise philosopher, a reflective soul, a person for all seasons as they say, than a person only checking bottom lines.

James Freeman Clarke noted this difference between a statesperson and a politician:

“The difference between a politician and a statesman is that a politician thinks about the next election while the statesman thinks about the next generation.”

The same difference may apply to business leaders as well. Such a difference is certainly evident here. While business leaders try to see trends and plan for the future, they often do this only from the limited perspective of protecting their source of income and profits. A statesperson has to see trends and plan for the future from a much wider perspective and one that takes into consideration a myriad of factors. They must also do this from a completely unselfish perspective, wherein they may actually be the loser, where any “profit” goes to others rather than themselves. There are indeed, to be sure, business leaders who might have the same skills and the wide-ranging knowledge and sensibilities of a statesperson, but my point is that more often than not, these two areas of endeavor attract, and require, different types of leaders and persons.

Governments should not be run like businesses and we should look for leaders who are statespersons, not career politicians or business leaders. We currently have the government we deserve. Let’s begin approaching these questions and areas in such a way that demonstrates we deserve better.

I have a Patreon Page—please consider supporting my writing.

Previous Post

March 5, 2019

Of God and Borders

Next Post

April 5, 2019 You Have No Power Here

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 May 2024 January 2024 November 2023 September 2023 July 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Where was Jesus Born?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bethlehem Shiloh Jerusalem Nazareth