You Keep Using That Term “Counter-Cultural”

Last updated on: September 29, 2018 at 11:16 am by Darrell Lackey

You Keep Using That Term “Counter-Cultural” 2018-09-29T11:16:18-07:00 Darrell Lackey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Being, “counter-cultural” is a buzz-word thrown around in fundamentalist/evangelical circles–many circles in fact. Or, it was when I was growing up in that world. Be different. Don’t follow the crowd. Lead. There was almost a militancy to the idea. “Stand up, stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of the cross…” You get the picture.

In American culture, we love the idea of the rebel. Think American Revolution and down the road a bit, a “Johnny Rebel.” Also, think James Dean and “Rebel Without a Cause.” Think Rambo. Think Top Gun and, “Maverick.” We love to think that everyone else is a mindless follower of the crowd, a lemming, while we alone stand back as the rest plunge over the cliff.

The bunker mentality in fundamentalism/evangelicalism, caused by a combination of end-times views and a truncated view of culture, when mixed with this rebel strain in our national story, lends an added impetus and strength to this notion of being, “counter-cultural.” The people in that world like to believe they are swimming against the stream.

However, the idea that American fundamentalism/evangelicalism is, “counter-cultural” may be one of the most incredible and self-deceptive myths in recent memory. It is something believed without a shred of evidence; we might compare it to believing we didn’t land on the moon or that the earth is flat.

The reason it is self-deceptive, and the reason it not only doesn’t have any influence on the culture, but instead reinforces it, is because it is the religious expression of that very culture. Fundamentalism/evangelicalism’s only challenge to the culture is to recognize their god, their view of Christianity, morality, and the Bible.

In other words, they are cool with pretty much everything else about the culture as far as the (classic)-liberal, western, democratic, capitalist, militarist, and purely American aspect to that culture/civilization/empire. They may quibble here and there with certain aspects of it, but it’s more about disliking the color of the drapes and carpet—the house however, the structure, in their view, is fine.

What they want is for that culture/civilization/empire to be, “Christian” in how they understand that term and in what they think it would then mean for a culture to reflect such. Their beef is that the culture was, “stolen” (false) from them, made to be secular (false), and that is the only reason they are upset.

For them, being, “counter-cultural” means trying to shame the, “secular,” or prove they are, “better,” than the secular by living piously: no drinking, smoking, profanity, (dancing?), R-rated movies, while adding alternative, “clean” contemporary music, movies, books, and television. Wow, that’ll show ‘em—eat that secular culture.

Thus, counter-cultural turns out to be the exact same culture, just scrubbed clean. It is the exact same culture, just one with a religious gloss and one that, frankly, doesn’t seem to want a culture much different from what other religious fundamentalists want. In their minds, being, “counter-cultural” just sort of means returning to 1950, which tells us much regarding what they think of people of color, women, sexuality, and difference in general.

A truly counter-cultural attempt would mean bringing everything into question and under judgement—starting with ourselves. It would mean challenging the reigning paradigm of capitalism, nationalism, patriarchy, consumerism, liberal democracy, militarism, and the American myth. It would mean addressing, deeply, the history of racism, sexism, and violence at the heart of the American experiment.

It would mean challenging the modern political Left and Right, both the Democrat and Republican parties, and the entire political structure, especially in their deep relation to, and reliance upon, corporate and wealthy donor money. It would mean challenging both religious fundamentalism and secular, atheistic, scientism, which means challenging fundamentalism in general—since they both are the result of the same sensibility and history.

It would mean taking the Sermon on the Mount seriously, not only personally, but as a community. It would mean actually loving our enemies and pursuing peace, even if it meant losing or not getting our way. It would mean sharing our resources in radical ways that far surpass what is possible through free markets, state taxation or redistribution. It would mean living in harmony with the environment (creation), even if that meant a loss of material wealth, cheap goods, and personal convenience.

It would mean a radical openness to the, “other,” the stranger, and those different from ourselves, to the extent we placed their needs above our own. It would mean giving up an, “America First” or a Christianity-first, or a, my-tribe-first mentality. It would mean taking up a, the first will be last and the last first mentality instead, where we are willing to give up our place in the world if it means others might thrive, flourish, and be saved.

Utopian? Unrealistic? Naive? Too radical? Probably. Do I live like this? Nope. Does that change anything I’ve written? I don’t think so. Most of us know what the ethical thing to do is, we just don’t do it. I think a true counter-culturalism would need to encompass the above to be true to the Christian narrative and faith.

There is a deep love, an extravagant giving away of one’s self, at the heart of the Christian faith, that is far more radical than anything we can imagine. Most western cultures after 400 A.D. have been attempts to avoid that radical nature, while doing their best to pay lip service to it. It’s what helps us sleep at night.

So yeah, that term you keep throwing around, “counter-cultural”—I don’t think it means what you think it means.

I have a Patreon Page—please consider supporting my writing.

Previous Post

September 17, 2018

True—Kaepernick Didn’t Sacrifice "Everything"

Next Post

October 13, 2018 This Rolling Spectacle

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month April 2025 February 2025 December 2024 October 2024 September 2024 July 2024 May 2024 January 2024 November 2023 September 2023 July 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Thomas doubted Jesus' resurrection until he saw and touched Jesus' wounds.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE