Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Diary of a Wimpy Catholic

Nicholas Christakis: Too Much Obsequiousness Is A Dangerous Thing

Last updated on: November 11, 2015 at 2:37 am   by Max Lindenman

Nicholas Christakis: Too Much Obsequiousness Is A Dangerous Thing 2015-11-11T02:37:55-06:00 Max Lindenman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Boy, am I ever out of touch.

Yesterday, when I begged compassion and mercy on behalf of the so-called “Shrieking Girl,” the Yale senior caught on video berating Silliman College Master Nicholas Christakis, I was working from the assumption that she had set herself up for a big fall. She’ll suffer, my reasoning went, not least through her own conscience. Why aggravate an individual’s trials in order to score points in a culture war?

Well, at the moment, whatever fall awaits the young woman seems less pressing than the fall taken voluntarily by Christakis himself, right onto his sword. The Washington Post reports that Christakis apologized to a group of about 100 students in the presence of university administrators. “I’ve disappointed you and I’m really sorry,” he said, adding shortly, “I’ve disappointed myself.”

Christakis’ sin, in his students’ judgment, was to support his wife, instructor and Silliman associate master Erika Christakis, who had responded sympathetically to complaints about official guidelines for Halloween costumes. Some students found the instructions over-precise, and Erika Christakis generally agreed. In an e-mail to Silliman residents, she conceded that vigilance against “cultural appropriation” – among other potential offenses targeted in the guidelines – was important, but argued gently that free expression represented a higher good.

Now that her husband has abandoned that position, the question remains: Why? If his reversal is an expression of careerism, that’s repulsive, though understandable. (Would that I, too, had a career worth sacrificing my principles for.) If, following an intellectual epiphany, he has actually changed his mind, that’s bad news for higher learning. But if he has allowed himself to be swayed by his students’ vehemence, that would be worst of all, and a genuine tragedy. It would illustrate the perversion of a very fine Christian quality: humility.

St. Thomas Aquinas defines humility in very practical terms. For the Angelic Doctor, it “Consists in keeping oneself within one’s own bounds, not reaching out to things above one, but submitting to one’s superior.” St. Bernard’s definition is a little more expansive. According to Abelard’s old sparring partner, humility is “A virtue by which a man knowing himself as he truly is, abases himself.”

The acts of abasing oneself and submitting reflect the same virtue, but they are not identical. Think of the first as washing feet and the second as kissing rings. The first may be good generally, but the second should be reserved for certain people. The viral video shows Christakis abasing himself quite thoroughly. Keeping his own voice low, he employs “active listening” techniques, nodding whenever his student speaks, by way of acknowledging her. With head slightly bowed and his hands clasped in front of him, he is almost literally cringing.

It’s just possible Christakis has assumed this position in the hope of blocking any sudden kicks aimed at his groin – a sensible plan, given the company he’s in – but I think it more likely he is going out of his way to carry himself in a manner that his high-strung students will find non-threatening. That manner may also reflect the fact Christakis is white whereas the aggrieved student has a dark skin, and that the dispute over culturally malignant Halloween wear arose as the Black Lives Matter movement was gaining traction on campus. He may be trying to preclude any impression of racial injustice by taking on the posture of a slave.

But in the end, Christakis went beyond self-abasement. He submitted to his students. That is, he allowed their will and judgment to prevail completely over his own. His students are not his superiors. Granted, a university residential community isn’t a rifle company or a corporation, and Christakis isn’t a captain or a CEO. But the relationship that exists now between students and master can’t even be called collegial. Silliman students – and possibly not even a majority of them – are yanking the master’s strings.

St. Thomas Aquinas wouldn’t have known a Social Justice Warrior if his family had turned one loose in his cell with orders to jump his bones. Nevertheless, he had the foresight to name “a too great obsequiousness or abjection of oneself” as “a vice opposed to humility.” Why? Well, it might “be derogatory to a man’s office…or it might serve only to pamper pride in others, by unworthy flattery, which would occasion their sins of tyranny, arbitrariness, and arrogance.”

Funny how that works.

Uncategorized

Black Lives Matter

Erika Christakis

Nicholas Christakis

saints

Silliman College

Yale University

Previous Post



November 10, 2015

Mercy for "Shrieking Girl"

Next Post



November 11, 2015 For Veterans' Day: Reflections on the Field-Hospital Church


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2016 July 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 July 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Animals that chew the cud but do not have split hooves are considered clean to eat.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Diary of a Wimpy Catholic

Catholic

Lent for the Reluctant Ascetic

Diary of a Wimpy Catholic

Catholic

Girls at the Altar: Decompressing A Condensed Symbol

Diary of a Wimpy Catholic

Catholic

Why Grow Up When You Can Be Christian?

Diary of a Wimpy Catholic

Catholic

A Humble Plug for Refugees

Diary of a Wimpy Catholic

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube