Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
The Myth of Israel’s “Right to Self-Defense”

The Myth of Israel’s “Right to Self-Defense”

Last updated on: August 27, 2025 at 12:05 am by Rob Dalrymple

The Myth of Israel’s “Right to Self-Defense” 2025-08-26T08:44:25-08:00 Rob Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

woman; karate

Does Israel’s right to “self-defense” include the right to annihilate Gaza? Image by svklimkin from Pixabay

There is a danger when using the “right to self-defense” argument. Jesus warned that “all those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword” (Matt 26:52). Using violence to combat violence usually creates more violence.

The question I wish to address, however, is whether or not Israel’s assault on Gaza is actually justified. Time and time again, we are told that Israel’s assault on Gaza is justified because a nation has the right to defend itself. But is that true?

Well, kinda, but kinda not.

NB: Last month I wrote a post Debunking Myths related to the war on Gaza. This post addresses another common assumption.

NB: I might add that history will likely judge Israel’s actions, along with its co-belligerents—the US and its Western allies—as having transcended any supposed “right” to self-defense.

Yet few are asking the more fundamental question: Does Israel even have the right to self-defense with respect to its assault on Gaza?

Of course, few have dared to question Israel’s right to self-defense for fear of the dreaded accusation of “antisemitism.”

NB: Antisemitism is real and must be condemned—which, at Determinetruth, we have repeatedly done on this post, livestreams, and podcasts. I do, however, take exception to the use of antisemitism as a means of damning the other and shutting off all constructive dialogue. And I don’t believe that this is helpful to the Jewish people. Criticism of Israel is no more antisemitic than criticism of the US is anti-American.

In addition to the concern of being charged with antisemitism, denying Israel’s “right” to self-defense is not good optics. After all, Israel suffered a heinous terrorist attack on October 7, 2023, on its own soil. An attack that took the lives of hundreds of its own people, including civilians, and entailed the taking of over 250 hostages.

The problem with the question of Israel’s right to self-defense lies in the complexity of discerning what one means by “self-defense.”

For example, if someone came into my home (God forbid) and began killing some member of my family and kidnapping others, as well as looting and destroying my property, I would not only have the right to defend myself and my family but a moral responsibility.

NB: As a proponent of non-violent resistance, the way I might respond might look quite different from others.

Within this context, one may confidently claim that Israel had the right to self-defense on October 7.

But that’s not the issue being debated. The real question has to do with whether Israel has the right to go to their attacker’s home—in this case, Gaza—and retaliate with an overwhelming force that is exponentially greater than that which they suffered on October 7?

Or, using the analogy of my neighbor’s attack on my home, we might ask if I would be morally justified in entering my neighbor’s home to kill, starve, and maim them in retaliation?

I say, no.

Does the Law of Proportionality apply?

Even if we were to grant the claim that Israel has the right to self-defense so that they are justified in seizing Gaza, international law requires that the conduct of that war must proceed according to the principle of proportionality.

This is where many critics of Israel and the IDF have taken their stand when it comes to Israel’s “right” to self-defense.

They contend that Israel’s right to self-defense does not legitimize the killing of 60,000+ and the wounded of hundreds of thousands, most of whom are women and children—noncombatants—nor does it permit Israel’s use of starvation as a weapon of war, nor their efforts to destroy virtually the entire infrastructure of Gaza: leaving the Strip on the brink of uninhabitability.

Israel’s defenders respond by claiming that Hamas poses an existential threat to Israel and must be defeated at all costs, rendering Israel’s actions jus in bellum (right to go to war).

This is where my analogy seems helpful. Israel’s defenders are essentially claiming that since the only way for my family to be safe is for us to completely destroy our neighbor’s home, and either kill them or force them out of the neighborhood.

Human shields

The defenders of Israel also claim that Israel’s annihilation of Gaza is justified because they are aiming for Hamas insurgents who embed themselves in hospitals and among civilians.

Israel’s critics respond by noting that Israel has failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the human shield allegations.

But I suggest that even if such allegations were factual, the law of proportionality still applies. Israel does not have the right to destroy Gaza’s entire medical system—critical for civilians during a time of war—because Hamas insurgents are embedded there any more than local authorities can blow up a school because there is a gunman inside.

Returning to my analogy, when it comes to the right to defend one’s family, property, and home, there is no denying that Israel had every right to defend its citizens on October 7. But what about my right to destroy my neighbor’s house or Israel’s right to attack Gaza?

Hamas started this war

Herein lies the root of the problem and the crux of the “right to self-defense” argument. Some have noted that a state’s right to self-defense (Article 51 of the UN Charter) only applies to attacks by state actors. Since Gaza is an occupied people and not an independent state, then Israel does not have the legal right to attack Gaza because Gaza is not a state actor but is a people under military occupation.

The problem here is that this “loophole”—i.e., the fact that Israel cannot use the self-defense clause of Article 51 of the UN Charter, because they were not attacked by another state—actually muddies the water more than is often realized.

Namely, if one were to argue that Gaza is not a state actor and, therefore, Israel cannot invoke Article 51 and its right to self-defense, then, by the same reasoning, Israel cannot be deemed to be in violation of the UN Charter because its act of belligerence was not against another state.

But, for the sake of those of us not formally trained in international law, my neighbor analogy suffices. Placing this conflict in terms of a dispute, albeit a very violent one, between neighbors, may offer some clarity.

On the one hand, the neighbors who committed the attack against me and my family should be held accountable for their crimes against us. Of course, a judge and jury, upon learning of the history of my family’s (i.e., Israel’s) injustices against them, may well lean a bit lighter on their punishment. My neighbors (i.e., Hamas), however, would not be innocent.

At the same time, any acts that my family and I (Israel) commit against them (Hamas/Gaza) as an act of retaliation must also be criminalized. Although I would be justified in defending my family and myself during their attack on us, I would not be justified in attacking their home.

Do the Palestinians have the “right to self-defense”?

This is what befuddles me when it comes to Israel’s assault on Gaza and the “self-defense” argument.

Those who defend Israel’s assault on Gaza as a justified act of “self-defense” do not apply the same right of “self-defense” to the Palestinians.

But if Israel has the right to “self-defense,” including the right for the IDF to enter Gaza, starve 2.2 million people, kill 60,000+, injure hundreds of thousands more, and destroy virtually the entire infrastructure of the Gaza Strip, then do not the people of Gaza have that same right of “self-defense”?

Neither has the “right” to self-defense

My argument here is that neither has the right to self-defense if that entails taking the offensive against the other. Gaza is not a state actor. The Palestinians are an oppressed people.

Both sides certainly have the right to defend themselves when resisting an aggressor.

There is one more caveat, however, that is often overlooked.

International law does give the Palestinians the right to self-determination (Article 1.2) and it forbids an occupying power from using force against those it occupies (Article 1.4).

Hence, the right to self-defense certainly applies to the Palestinians.

In the next post, I hope to address the notion that Hamas started the war . . .

Have any questions for us? Reach out to us at [email protected]

Make sure to subscribe to the Determinetruth newsletter on Patheos to receive email notification every time a new post is uploaded (note: this is not a traditional newsletter; it simply means you will be emailed every time a new blog is posted).

At Determinetruth, we work independently of any church or institution. This allows us to speak more candidly (shall we say “prophetically”). We refuse to put these posts behind a paywall, which hinders the poor from accessing the information. But we can only continue these posts with the support of those of you who can afford to give. So, if you can afford to give $5, $10, $25, or $1 million/month, please do so. You can provide a tax-deductible contribution by following this link. Choose “Rob” in the dropdown menu.

Please share this post and let others know about determinetruth.

If you wish to view this blog on your smartphone through the Determinetruth app, download the “tithe.ly church” app and insert “determinetruth” as the name of the church you wish to follow. Once it is loaded, click on the “blog” icon, and it will automatically load.

If you would like Rob to speak to your church, organization, or group in person or via Zoom, please let us know by filling out the contact info on the Contact Me tab on the determinetruth site.

General Christian

Politics and Religion

History and Religion

Self-defense; Hamas; IDF; Israel

About Rob Dalrymple

Rob Dalrymple is married to his wife Toni and is the father of four fabulous children, and three grandchildren. He has been teaching and pastoring for over 36 years at colleges, seminaries, and the local church. He has a PhD in biblical interpretation. He is the author of six books (including Follow the Lamb: A Guide to Reading, Understanding, and Applying the Book of Revelation & Understanding the New Testament and the End Times: Why it Matters) as well as numerous articles and other publications. His commentary on the book of Revelation titled, “Revelation: a Love Story” (Cascade Books, July 2024) is making waves in the scholarly world. His latest book, Land of Contention: Biblical Narratives and the Struggle for the Holy Land discussed the role of the church in peacemaking in the light of the war on Gaza and the struggles in the West Bank and is available now on Amazon or wherever you get your books (hopefully somewhere besides Amazon!) You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

August 15, 2025

When Trump and MAGA Meet the War Machine

Next Post

October 9, 2025 Why Trump winning the Nobel Prize Today might not be good

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 000 1 Cor 11:17-34 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 10 Commandments 2 Corinthians 2 John 2 Peter 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy 3 John 666 Abortion Acts 2:42 Ahmaud Arbery AIPAC All Saints Day America antisemitism BDS Beast Betting Bible Bible study Biblical Interpretation Biden Book of Acts Boycott Campus Protests Catholicism Ceasefire Chavez Ravine Christian Nationalism Christian Zionism Christianity Today Christmas Church Colossians Communion Convict Leasing Covid-19 Craig Blaising creation Crucifixion Daoud Nassar Deception Deconstruction Democracy Devotional guide Discipleship Easter Eden Education Election End-times Ephesians Eschatology Ethnic Cleansing Evangelicalism Evangelicals Evolution Fall Famine Fascism FIFA Freedom of Speech Galatians Gary Burge Gaza Gaza; Genocide; Boycott Genesis Genocide George Floyd Global Warming God's will Gospel Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Government Grace Great Prostitute Hamas Harris healthcare Hebrews HeGetsUs Holy Spirit Holy Week Honor Father and Mother ICJ Immigration Indigenous peoples day Iran Israel Israel Palestine Itamar Ben Gvir James Jesus Joel Willits Jude Just war Justice Kamala Harris Kingdom Of God Kings and Queens land of Israel Law (OT) Lazarus Les Miserable LGBTQ+ Love Luke Mahmoud Khalil Man of Lawlessness Mark Mark of the Beast Marriage Martin Luther King Jr Mercy Mexican Repatriation Military-Industrial-Complex Ministry Mission Money NAFTA Nakba Netanyahu New Creation New Testament Nicaragua Nicodemus Non Violence Occupation Pacifism Palestine Parable Paul Peace Pentecost Peonage Philemon Philippians Politics Poor Power Prayer Pride Month Priests Pro-life Propaganda Prophesy Prophet Qatar Queen Elizabeth Racism Reconstruction Redemption Reformation Resurrection Revelation Roe v Wade Romans Romans 13:1-7 Rome Russia Sabbath Samaritan Seals Sermon Settlements Slavery Spiritual gifts Taxes Tent of Nations Terrorism The Beast Theology Titus Torture Trump truth Ukraine Uncategorized Veteran's Day War Warsaw Ghetto wealth Wedding Women World Cup 2022 Worldview Worship Wrath Yemen Zionism

Select a Month September 2026 May 2026 February 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 September 2017 July 2017 May 2017 November 2016 October 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small, out of you will come a ruler over Israel. What makes this town significant?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A holy city David's hometown A place of prophecy The birthplace of the Messiah

Support this
Column