Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
One Year in Reflecting on the War on Gaza & Path to Peace

One Year in Reflecting on the War on Gaza & Path to Peace

Last updated on: October 7, 2024 at 12:17 am by Rob Dalrymple

One Year in Reflecting on the War on Gaza & Path to Peace 2024-10-05T15:56:27-08:00 Rob Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The war on Gaza has been going on for a year. Gaza is almost completely destroyed.

Today is the one year . . . (I don’t see how the word “anniversary” is appropriate). Let me reword this. One year ago today, Hamas broke through the security barrier and launched its terror attack on Israel.

I will be live tonight (October 7, 2024) at 5:00 pm PST (this link is good even after the live event) to discuss the past year and where we are today. I intend to have several guests to hear their perspectives as well.

The tragedy in Gaza to date

The death toll is beyond imagination. The most recent numbers indicate over 42,500 Gazans and 1,139 Israelis have died, as well as 726 IDF (this number is surely an underestimate), and 97 hostages remain (7 of them are Americans), though 1/3 feared dead.

Demonizing rhetoric does not help

The rhetoric on both sides has been overwhelming.

Netanyahu displays a map depicting the wise and the foolish options. For him, the wise option is to destroy Iran enough. In his mind, this is an existential battle between “good” and “evil.”

I posted the picture on the right on my Facebook page and noted,

“I know it is hard to have these conversations on Facebook and Instagram because most people hear what they want to hear. I have a book on this topic in the next month or so, in case you are interested in a more extended examination of the text. But a few thoughts here seem warranted.

1) I don’t recommend consulting a secular PM (Netanyahu is a secular Jew) on the meaning of the Scriptures. This is especially true since his interpretation is guided by personal and political interests. This is not an attack on his character. It is simply a statement addressing the wisdom of the matter.

2) The problem with this approach to “blessing” and “curses” is that it supposes one side to be the “good” (Israel) and the other to be the “bad” (Iran). The end result is to demonize the one (Iran) to justify war against them (I am in no way suggesting that Iran is good. My point is that the demonization of the other does no good and likely only serves to justify atrocities against them). In addition, the notion that the other is “good” (Israel) allows one to overlook their injustices in Gaza, the West Bank, and elsewhere.”

I concluded the post with, “Civil interaction is welcome below.”

NB: As I finished this post, I checked my FB page, and I had an announcement. FB removed this post, and I have been censored!

Well, someone took me up on the offer and stated (my paraphrase), “Israel has the right to live in peace. So, yes, Israel is “good” and Iran is “bad.”

Not only is this thinking unchristian, but it is also dangerous. Labeling one side as the good usually means that we are unwilling to critique it. Why should we? What it does is good.

When we ask, “What about the 42,500 dead in Gaza?” (the number most assuredly is much higher—as I will address on tonight’s livestream), the answer comes back as “If there are any civilians dead in Gaza, it is Hamas’ fault for using them as human shields” (btw, this is an actual statement. In fact, it was made just the other day by an ordained minister with an excellent scholarly reputation).

This sort of irrational justification for the dead in Gaza makes sense when we assume one side is “good” and the other is “evil.”

Israel’s right to self-defense

I recently asked a pro-Israel scholar with whom I have been in dialogue for some time now what he thought about Israel’s act of “self-defense” now that we have had a year to see that Israel is most certainly going beyond mere self-defense. He responded by noting that he agreed that we need a cease-fire. This might seem like a positive step. But I’m sorry, I find this response incredulous.

One year ago, when the war started, I and many others insisted that the Christian thing to do was to demand an immediate cease-fire and a just peace. This assertion was met repeatedly (by this scholar and others) with two common replies.

Do you believe (asking me a question before they would answer my question) that Hamas is a terrorist organization? And do you condemn what they did on Oct 7?
Israel has a right to defend herself.

Now, I have not hesitated to say that Hamas’ actions on Oct 7, 2023, were damnable (yes, I used this word).

What I don’t understand, however, about this standard response is that it should go both ways. That is, don’t the people of Gaza and the Palestinians in the West Bank have the right to defend themselves?

Ironically, international law says that people (in this case, the Palestinians) who are oppressed by a foreign entity (in this case, Israel) have the right to self-defense. In other words, the Gazans have every right to defend themselves by international law. There is no denying, and I will repeat it, that the actions of Hamas on October 7 transcended the law by including terror on civilians.

NB: I reject the notion that one is either pro-Israel or pro-Palestine. Why can’t we be “pro-peace,” “pro-justice,” and “pro-humanity”? Why can’t we be pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian?

In addition, it was evident to everyone who has studied this issue for any amount of time that Israel was going to use the attack of October 7 to reign hellfire on Gaza. Nonetheless, those who side with Israel were adamant that Israel’s actions were justified.

Yet, now that it has become more than apparent that Israel’s actions in Gaza have gone well beyond the limits of self-defense, there are no words of condemnation towards Israel. There is only a concession, “We need a cease-fire.”

When I tried to explain last November that Hamas was an ideology and could not be destroyed, this same scholar was adamant, “Well, Israel needs to try.”

Why is it that we are required to condemn Hamas and the attack of October 7 before a conversation can begin, but they are not required to condemn Israel for its devastation of Gaza that unequivocally transcends any right to self-defense?

Where do we go from here?

From the beginning, we have been saying we need a negotiated just-peace that brings a lasting solution. The hostages need to be returned; the Palestinians that are being detained need to be released; Israel’s settlement expansion needs to cease; Hamas needs to renounce terrorism and acknowledge Israel’s right to exist; and the occupation must end.

Is this possible? Well, that is above my pay grade. But I will say that something needs to happen because the current course of events will likely not end well for either the Palestinians or the Israelis.

I refuse to put these posts behind a paywall. This hinders the poor from accessing the information. But I can only continue these posts with the support of those of you who can afford to give. So, if you can afford to give $5, $10, $25, or $1 million/month, please do so. You can give a tax-deductible contribution by following this link.

Progressive Christian

Politics and Religion

History and Religion

Israel; Gaza; War; propaganda; hermeneutics

About Rob Dalrymple

Rob Dalrymple is married to his wife Toni and is the father of four fabulous children, and two grandchildren. He has been teaching and pastoring for over 34 years at colleges, seminaries, and the local church. He has a PhD in biblical interpretation. He is the author of four books (including Follow the Lamb: A Guide to Reading, Understanding, and Applying the Book of Revelation & Understanding the New Testament and the End Times: Why it Matters) as well as numerous articles and other publications. His commentary on the book of Revelation titled, “Revelation: a Love Story” (Cascade Books, July 2024) has just been released. His new book, Land of Contention: Biblical Narratives and the Struggle for the Holy Land, should be out by the Fall of 2024. You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

September 30, 2024

CT Podcast series on Israel-Palestine: Dangerous Propaganda?

Next Post

October 14, 2024 Calling for Justice: Sadly CT’s Podcast Perpetuates Conflict

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 000 1 Cor 11:17-34 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 10 Commandments 2 Corinthians 2 John 2 Peter 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy 3 John 666 Abortion Acts 2:42 Ahmaud Arbery AIPAC All Saints Day America antisemitism BDS Beast Betting Bible Bible study Biblical Interpretation Biden Book of Acts Boycott Campus Protests Catholicism Ceasefire Chavez Ravine Christian Nationalism Christian Zionism Christianity Today Christmas Church Colossians Communion Convict Leasing Covid-19 Craig Blaising creation Crucifixion Daoud Nassar Deception Deconstruction Democracy Devotional guide Discipleship Easter Eden Education Election End-times Ephesians Eschatology Ethnic Cleansing Evangelicalism Evangelicals Evolution Fall Famine Fascism FIFA Freedom of Speech Galatians Gary Burge Gaza Gaza; Genocide; Boycott Genesis Genocide George Floyd Global Warming God's will Gospel Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Government Grace Great Prostitute Hamas Harris healthcare Hebrews HeGetsUs Holy Spirit Holy Week Honor Father and Mother ICJ Immigration Indigenous peoples day Iran Israel Israel Palestine Itamar Ben Gvir James Jesus Joel Willits Jude Just war Justice Kamala Harris Kingdom Of God Kings and Queens land of Israel Law (OT) Lazarus Les Miserable LGBTQ+ Love Luke Mahmoud Khalil Man of Lawlessness Mark Mark of the Beast Marriage Martin Luther King Jr Mercy Mexican Repatriation Military-Industrial-Complex Ministry Mission Money NAFTA Nakba Netanyahu New Creation New Testament Nicaragua Nicodemus Non Violence Occupation Pacifism Palestine Parable Paul Peace Pentecost Peonage Philemon Philippians Politics Poor Power Prayer Pride Month Priests Pro-life Propaganda Prophesy Prophet Qatar Queen Elizabeth Racism Reconstruction Redemption Reformation Resurrection Revelation Roe v Wade Romans Romans 13:1-7 Rome Russia Sabbath Samaritan Seals Sermon Settlements Slavery Spiritual gifts Taxes Tent of Nations Terrorism The Beast Theology Titus Torture Trump truth Ukraine Uncategorized Veteran's Day War Warsaw Ghetto wealth Wedding Women World Cup 2022 Worldview Worship Wrath Yemen Zionism

Select a Month September 2026 May 2026 February 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 September 2017 July 2017 May 2017 November 2016 October 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Paul taught the Galatians that circumcision is necessary for salvation.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Support this
Column