Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Does the NT teach the subordination of women? An examination of 1 Cor 11:2-16 (part 3): Women-Injustice#12; Justice#23

Does the NT teach the subordination of women? An examination of 1 Cor 11:2-16 (part 3): Women-Injustice#12; Justice#23

Last updated on: June 24, 2021 at 3:32 am by Rob Dalrymple

Does the NT teach the subordination of women? An examination of 1 Cor 11:2-16 (part 3): Women-Injustice#12; Justice#23 2021-06-21T08:58:45-08:00 Rob Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is no question that 1 Cor 11:2-16 appears to teach that women are subordinate to men. But does it really say that?

Upon examining 1 Cor 11:2-16, it makes the most sense of the passage, as well as the larger context of 1 Cor 11-14, to suggest that the majority of the argumentation in 1 Cor 11:3-10 are the words of the Corinthians, with a few interjections of Paul, and that 1 Cor 11:11-16 constitute Paul’s response.[1]

This suggestion not only makes the most sense of the passage and its surrounding context but also resolves a very apparent problem with the complementarian (male headship) reading. Namely, that 1 Cor 11:13-15, which contends that women should not have head coverings because their primary authority is God, contradicts the assertions of 11:3-10, which says that women should have head coverings because they are subordinate to men.[2]

1 Cor 11:2-16: a closer look

In looking more closely at the passage, we note that the argument begins with,

“But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ” (11:3).

It makes good sense of the text, and all that I have noted previously, to suppose that the Corinthians were postulating the first part of 11:3, “Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman,” and that Paul responds to them by noting, sure but “God is the head of Christ” in the latter part of 11:3.

1 Cor 11:4-5 then states,

“Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved.”

These verses clearly contend that women are under the authority of men and because of this they should have a head covering. To place these words in the mouth of Paul would not only conflict with the whole tenor of the NT, as I have already noted, but would be entirely inconsistent with what Paul himself says in the rest of 1 Corinthians 11 and into 1 Corinthians 12-14.

Paul’s response to the Corinthian assertion that the women should have head coverings because they are under men is to note that both males and females are under God. Since God is the primary authority for both, women do not need to have a sign of authority on their heads to show that they are under men.

Paul provides his complete response and the conclusion to his argument beginning in 1 Cor 11:11. This is evident by the fact that 1 Cor 11:11 opens with Paul’s rare use of the particle “plen” (meaning: “yet, nevertheless, only, but, however”).

The importance of this particle as an indication that Paul begins to present the primary thrust of his argument is picked up by the scholar Shoemaker: “Another term that should be noted is plen v. 11. Although generally translated ‘only’ or ‘nevertheless,’ I believe this particle takes on a special rhetorical function for Paul. Although used only four times in his letters (Philippians 1:18; 3:16; 4:14; and here), it appears to serve as a pointer in each case to an important statement. It is a term that introduces Paul’s central theme in each context. Thus, I have chosen to render it: ‘The point is.’”[3]

In 1 Cor 11:11, Paul begins his response to his opponents’ claim that the woman originates from the man (arguing from Genesis 2) by noting that “in the Lord” neither is independent of the other and that all things “originate from God.”

For Paul, this means that,

“in the Lord, neither is woman independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. For as the woman originates from the man, so also the man has his birth through the woman; and all things originate from God” (1 Cor 11:11).

To the Corinthian assertion that the woman comes from the man, Paul replies, (yes, but), the man comes from the woman and “all things originate from God!”

It makes much more sense of the passage, and it conforms to the larger context of 1 Corinthians 11-14, as well as the tenor of the entire NT, which consistently uplifts the oppressed, to conclude that some of the Corinthian men were arguing that women needed to show their submission to the men by having their heads covered (11:3-10) and that Paul responds by saying that all persons are equally under the authority of God.

Paul then adds that she has long hair and that is enough of a covering (11:15).

Paul concludes his argument in 1 Cor 11:16 by reminding the Corinthians that none of the churches are doing what they are demanding:

“But if one is inclined to be contentious, we have no other practice, nor have the churches of God.”

In conclusion, I would note that the primary text for male supremacy doesn’t actually teach male supremacy!

In my next post, I’ll address the “women must be silent” text of 1 Cor 14:34-35.

If you have been blessed by this blog post and would like to see others benefit too, would you please consider giving a tax-deductible contribution to support determinetruth ministries and make possible future posts like this? You can do so by following this link: https://tithe.ly/give?c=3648601

If you would like to have Rob speak at your church or organization in person or via zoom, please let us know by filling out the contact info on the Contact me tab on this site.

[1] This is not my conviction alone. This understanding was first proposed by Peppiatt. In her book she references a number of scholars that support many of her conclusions, though none have advanced the thesis that Paul is citing the Corinthians and then giving his response, to the same degree that Peppiatt has done. I have taken Peppiatt’s arguments and reinforced them by connecting them even more closely with the larger scope of 1 Cor 11-14—something Peppiatt does only marginally.

[2] The Danver’s statement, which contends for male superiority, cites 1 Cor 11:7-9 in point 3 of their affirmations as an indication that male headship is established by God. https://cbmw.org/about/danvers-statement/. But 1 Cor 11:7-9 contradicts 1 Cor 11:13-15. It makes the most sense then to conclude that 1 Cor 11:7-9 were the words of Paul’s opponents. The authors of the Danver’s statement are citing Paul’s opponents in order to make their case!

[3] Shoemaker, Cited by Peppiatt, Lucy. Women and Worship at Corinth: Paul’s Rhetorical Arguments in 1 Corinthians (p. 102). Cascade Books, an Imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers. Kindle Edition.

[4] This is an approach Paul uses often!

Bible

Biblical Interpretation

Previous Post

June 22, 2021

Does the NT teach the subordination of women? An examination of 1 Cor 11:2-16 (part 2): Women-Injustice#11; Justice#22

Next Post

June 28, 2021 Misogyny and the Bible: Does the NT teach that women must be silent in the church? An examination of 1 Cor 14:34-35: Women-Injustice#13; Justice#24

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 000 1 Cor 11:17-34 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 10 Commandments 2 Corinthians 2 John 2 Peter 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy 3 John 666 Abortion Acts 2:42 Ahmaud Arbery AIPAC All Saints Day America antisemitism BDS Beast Betting Bible Bible study Biblical Interpretation Biden Book of Acts Boycott Campus Protests Catholicism Ceasefire Chavez Ravine Christian Nationalism Christian Zionism Christianity Today Christmas Church Colossians Communion Convict Leasing Covid-19 Craig Blaising creation Crucifixion Daoud Nassar Deception Deconstruction Democracy Devotional guide Discipleship Easter Eden Education Election End-times Ephesians Eschatology Ethnic Cleansing Evangelicalism Evangelicals Evolution Fall Famine Fascism FIFA Freedom of Speech Galatians Gary Burge Gaza Gaza; Genocide; Boycott Genesis Genocide George Floyd Global Warming God's will Gospel Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Government Grace Great Prostitute Hamas Harris healthcare Hebrews HeGetsUs Holy Spirit Holy Week Honor Father and Mother ICJ Immigration Indigenous peoples day Iran Israel Israel Palestine Itamar Ben Gvir James Jesus Joel Willits Jude Just war Justice Kamala Harris Kingdom Of God Kings and Queens land of Israel Law (OT) Lazarus Les Miserable LGBTQ+ Love Luke Mahmoud Khalil Man of Lawlessness Mark Mark of the Beast Marriage Martin Luther King Jr Mercy Mexican Repatriation Military-Industrial-Complex Ministry Mission Money NAFTA Nakba Netanyahu New Creation New Testament Nicaragua Nicodemus Non Violence Occupation Pacifism Palestine Parable Paul Peace Pentecost Peonage Philemon Philippians Politics Poor Power Prayer Pride Month Priests Pro-life Propaganda Prophesy Prophet Qatar Queen Elizabeth Racism Reconstruction Redemption Reformation Resurrection Revelation Roe v Wade Romans Romans 13:1-7 Rome Russia Sabbath Samaritan Seals Sermon Settlements Slavery Spiritual gifts Taxes Tent of Nations Terrorism The Beast Theology Titus Torture Trump truth Ukraine Uncategorized Veteran's Day War Warsaw Ghetto wealth Wedding Women World Cup 2022 Worldview Worship Wrath Yemen Zionism

Select a Month September 2026 May 2026 February 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 September 2017 July 2017 May 2017 November 2016 October 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I became queen through a beauty contest, hiding my Jewish identity at my cousin's advice. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Vashti Esther Sarah Ruth

Support this
Column