Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Pursue truth at all times, then follow it (part 3)

Pursue truth at all times, then follow it (part 3)

Last updated on: July 22, 2020 at 4:33 am by Rob Dalrymple

Pursue truth at all times, then follow it (part 3) 2020-07-21T15:01:13-08:00 Rob Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In part 1 of this series, I argued that we should have a goal to seek the truth at all times and then follow it!

After all, if we believe that Jesus is the Truth (John 14:6), we have nothing to fear. All truth will only point us to Christ! –which is the goal of the Christian life: as Paul says, “We proclaim Him, admonishing every man and teaching every man with all wisdom, so that we may present every man complete in Christ” (Col 1:28)

We would like to think that most people, especially ourselves, are open and honest people. The more information that we have the better decisions we will make. What I have been contending in this series of posts is that more information doesn’t always help! In fact, it tends to make us more dogmatic and more entrenched in our convictions.

This is shameful. And, as I will contend in part 4 of this series, it does great harm to our Christian witness.

How come more knowledge isn’t necessarily helpful?

In part 1 of this series, I noted that we have a heart issue: “The heart is more deceitful than all else and is desperately sick” (Jer 17:9). This keeps us from being open-minded.

In part 2 of this series, I continued the discussion by noting our pride hinders us from being objective and honest evaluators of information. We all have trouble admitting when we are wrong.

Furthermore, I also noted that we deny the truth because we are too often unwilling to change our behavior.

In this post, I wish to look more deeply at the scientific data that supports the inference that simply having more information does not always lead us to the truth.

We are all biased

We are all biased. Our natural tendency is to look at the world through our own personal bias. For example, if I believe that person A is a good person, I will be more inclined to assume that his/her motives were good in a given situation. And I will tend to filter out contrary evidence.

This can, of course, be overcome. People do change their beliefs and their ways.

According to the book of Acts, many of the early converts to Christianity were priests and leaders in Jerusalem (Acts 6:7). This is incredible when one thinks about it.

According to the biblical account, many of the religious leaders were opposed to Jesus and His claims. Many of them even sought His death. Why, then, would those who were so opposed to Jesus while He was alive, suddenly become His followers after His death? When one considers the risk that such persons were taking in coming to Christ, it only adds to the incredulity of their coming to a belief in Christianity.

Too often, however, this sort of transformation marks the exception rather than the rule. Most people are unwilling to look at information objectively.

Motivated reasoning

One of the reasons why we do not look at facts objectively is what is known in the field of cognitive science as “motivated reasoning.”

Motivated reasoning is very evident when it comes to sporting events. Was the referee’s decision correct? We might want to believe that with the advent of video review, that, at least in most instances, there would be an objective answer to the question (there will always be a measure of subjectivity in some sporting decisions).

We all know, however, that, most often, the answer to “was the referee’s decision correct” is determined by whether or not the referee’s call benefitted my team.

Well, I hate to break it to you, it ain’t just sports in which people are not objective. It is most of life!

Just last night I was watching a global newscast (BBC) in which there was a report on human rights violations by the Chinese government against the Uyghurs—a minority Muslim population that has suffered greatly for many decades in western China. The report showed “verified” video evidence of the severe mistreatment of Uyghurs. The Chinese ambassador to the UK, who was a guest on the program, was asked about the situation. His response: he simply denied the veracity of the video footage. He didn’t address the question at all, because he rejected the evidence.

Perhaps the leading researcher on motivated reasoning is Dan Kahan of Yale law school.[1] The premise of his research has confirmed that oftentimes the more information we have the less objective and the more entrenched we become.

Ezra Klein, reporting on the research of Kahan and his co-authors, Ellen Peters, Erica Cantrell Dawson, and Paul Slovic, noted that “The More Information Hypothesis isn’t just wrong. It’s backwards. Cutting-edge research shows that the more information partisans get, the deeper their disagreements become.”[2]

Kahan and his colleagues manufactured a setting to discern how personal preference influences one’s objectivity.

They began by presenting individuals with data relating to a skin cream. The participants were to determine if the skin cream was effective or not at curing a rash. Essentially, all one had to do to determine the effectiveness of the skin cream was to solve a simple math equation. In the data, there were two groups of people:

Group A were given the cream and applied it to their rash. Some of them got better, while a certain number got worse.
Group B were not given the cream. Some of them got better, while a certain number of them got worse.

In order to discern if the cream was effective, the respondents simply had to compare the numbers.

The data they were given showed that while twice as many people who received the cream got better compared to those who did not receive the cream, there were three times as many who received the cream who got worse compared to those who did not receive the cream. Simple math tells us that the cream was not an effective product. Two times as many people may have been helped, but three times as many people were made worse.

Kahan noted that the respondents’ decision to determine the effectiveness of the cream was directly correlated to their mathematical abilities.

Motivated reasoning applied to politicized issues

Kahan then took the exact same figures used in the cream scenario (twice as many got better but three times as many got worse) and applied them to a politicized problem; such as gun control or climate change.

He noted that suddenly the respondent’s math skills seemed to matter less. Instead, their ideology had a significant impact on their ability to look at the data. That is, people’s math skills were no longer the most significant factor as to whether or not they were able to analyze the data correctly.[3] Instead, they often chose to read the data in a manner that confirmed their prior convictions.

When it came to the skin cream, since they had no prior convictions, and since they did particularly care if the cream worked or not, most respondents were able to analyze the data and use basic math skills to determine if the cream was effective.

However, when it came to climate change or gun control, all bets were off. Most respondents began the analysis with a predisposition for or against the proposition and, consequently, chose to analyze the data in a manner that confirmed their prior convictions!

Why does this matter?

In part 4, I will take up this question more fully. For now, I’ll mention two significant reasons:

Our growth into the likeness of Christ correlates to some extent with the knowledge of the truth.
The witness of God’s people is at stake.

[1]https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=dan+kahan+motivated+reasoning&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart.

[2] https://www.vox.com/2014/4/6/5556462/brain-dead-how-politics-makes-us-stupid. Last cited June 5, 2020.

[3] For a TedTalk presentation of Kahan on this matter see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KFtQV7SiII

Bible

Biblical Interpretation

Previous Post

June 19, 2020

Jesus, Israel, and the Land

Next Post

August 14, 2020 Pursue the truth at all times: then follow it (part 4): Five ways to healthy conversations that will not only enhance your journey with Christ, but also advance your witness

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 000 1 Cor 11:17-34 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 10 Commandments 2 Corinthians 2 John 2 Peter 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy 3 John 666 Abortion Acts 2:42 Ahmaud Arbery AIPAC All Saints Day America antisemitism BDS Beast Betting Bible Bible study Biblical Interpretation Biden Book of Acts Boycott Campus Protests Catholicism Ceasefire Chavez Ravine Christian Nationalism Christian Zionism Christianity Today Christmas Church Colossians Communion Convict Leasing Covid-19 Craig Blaising creation Crucifixion Daoud Nassar Deception Deconstruction Democracy Devotional guide Discipleship Easter Eden Education Election End-times Ephesians Eschatology Ethnic Cleansing Evangelicalism Evangelicals Evolution Fall Famine Fascism FIFA Freedom of Speech Galatians Gary Burge Gaza Gaza; Genocide; Boycott Genesis Genocide George Floyd Global Warming God's will Gospel Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Government Grace Great Prostitute Hamas Harris healthcare Hebrews HeGetsUs Holy Spirit Holy Week Honor Father and Mother ICJ Immigration Indigenous peoples day Iran Israel Israel Palestine Itamar Ben Gvir James Jesus Joel Willits Jude Just war Justice Kamala Harris Kingdom Of God Kings and Queens land of Israel Law (OT) Lazarus Les Miserable LGBTQ+ Love Luke Mahmoud Khalil Man of Lawlessness Mark Mark of the Beast Marriage Martin Luther King Jr Mercy Mexican Repatriation Military-Industrial-Complex Ministry Mission Money NAFTA Nakba Netanyahu New Creation New Testament Nicaragua Nicodemus Non Violence Occupation Pacifism Palestine Parable Paul Peace Pentecost Peonage Philemon Philippians Politics Poor Power Prayer Pride Month Priests Pro-life Propaganda Prophesy Prophet Qatar Queen Elizabeth Racism Reconstruction Redemption Reformation Resurrection Revelation Roe v Wade Romans Romans 13:1-7 Rome Russia Sabbath Samaritan Seals Sermon Settlements Slavery Spiritual gifts Taxes Tent of Nations Terrorism The Beast Theology Titus Torture Trump truth Ukraine Uncategorized Veteran's Day War Warsaw Ghetto wealth Wedding Women World Cup 2022 Worldview Worship Wrath Yemen Zionism

Select a Month September 2026 May 2026 February 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 September 2017 July 2017 May 2017 November 2016 October 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What were the Ten Commandments written down on?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Stone tablets The Ark of the Covenant Papyrus Scrolls

Support this
Column