Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
The Parable of the Man Whose House is on Fire

The Parable of the Man Whose House is on Fire

Last updated on: August 26, 2020 at 10:37 am by Rob Dalrymple

The Parable of the Man Whose House is on Fire 2020-08-26T10:37:08-08:00 Rob Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“My house is on fire! my house is on fire!” a neighbor pleaded with me for help.

I, of course, did nothing about it.

“It is the blue one on the corner near the . . .” they attempted to continue before I interrupted.

“Whoa. Wait a minute. Why are you trying to bring which house it is into this? Am I supposed to believe that your house is any more important than any other house?”

“Because my house is on fire!” My neighbor responded with a somewhat exasperated and at the same time puzzled response.

“Well, that may be. But we don’t need to make this about your house. After all, don’t all houses matter?” I replied.

“Sure, all houses matter. But mine really matters right now, because it is on fire. Can you help me?”

“Well, I would love to help. But, if I help you, then what about the next person that comes along and tries to tell me that their house is special and needs attention? Will I not be constantly helping people? And doesn’t my house matter also?” I kindly replied.

Now, you may say, “but his house is on fire!”

I know, but, seriously, why can’t these people be responsible enough to make sure that their homes don’t catch fire?

This may sound incredulous, and it does, but this is what we are saying when we reply to “Black Lives Matter” with “all lives matter.”

When someone replies, “all lives matter” they are missing the point. After all, those who affirm “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) are not saying other lives don’t. They are saying that we live in a system in which black lives often don’t matter. They are saying that at this point in time we live in a system in which a police officer can kneel on the neck of a black man for more than 8 mins until he dies: All the while the man is crying out “I can’t breathe.” If this man’s life mattered, then why didn’t the other police officers do something about it?

When people are saying the Black Lives Matter, they are crying out about a system in which black men are incarcerated at a rate 6x higher than white men for drug use even though drug use among white and black men are nearly identical[1] and usage among white youth is actually higher than among black young men.[2] Yet, the fact is that 1 out of every 17 white men in the US are incarcerated, while 1 out of every 3 black men, and 1 out of every 6 Latino men are incarcerated.

The statistics are the same for women as well. 1 in 111 white women are incarcerated, while 1 out of every 18 black women and 1 in every 44 Latino women are incarcerated.

This is what the Black Lives Matter movement is saying. They are not saying that all lives do not matter. They are saying that right now Black Lives Matter. We have a national emergency on our hands. Failing to address the epidemic of systemic racism will make Covid-19 look like a bad cold.

When someone says, “all lives matter,” they are, in effect, saying, “sorry for your cough, you might want to get that looked at.”

Now, others might look at the BLM movement and note that there are elements of it that we might not agree with. This is tantamount to saying that I cannot belong to a certain denomination because I do not agree with every aspect of it. No one does.

I have worked at a number of institutions in which I have had to sign the Westminster Confession of faith. Every time I do so, I am allowed to state that, though I agree with the confession as a whole, I do not agree with various parts. When someone affirms BLM, that does not mean that they are affirming everything that BLM stands for or has stood for. It seems as though, whenever, white people want to support BLM, we have to give these asterisks.

BLM never said, nor intended to say, “only Black lives matter.”

If we were to say the “women’s lives matter” in reference to thousands of young women enslaved in sex trafficking, would people respond with “all lives matter?”

If we were to say that “children’s lives matter” in reference to childhood poverty, would people respond with “all lives matter?”

If we were to say that “persons with special needs lives matters” in reference to the discrimination that they face, would people respond with “all lives matter?”

If we were to say that “veteran’s lives matter” in reference to the discrimination they face, would people respond with “all lives matter?”

If we were to say that “refugees lives matter” in reference to the discrimination they face would people respond with “all lives matter?”

When people are faced with discrimination and hardship it is right and just and fair to cry out and say that “all lives matter?”

Why, then, is okay to reply to Black Lives Matter, with “all lives matter”? Doing so fails to grasp the significance of the specific issues people of color face in the United States.

One pastor I know posted, “we should say ‘Black Lives Matter’ because it is the Gospel not politics.” Stop making this a partisan issue. This is a human issue. Black Lives Matter.

[1] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Summary of Findings from the 2000 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, NHSDA series H-13, DHHS pub. no. SMA 01-3549 (Rockville, MD: 2001), reporting that 6.4 percent of whites, 6.4 percent of blacks, and 5.3 percent of Hispanics were current users of illegal drugs in 2000; Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings, NHSDA series H-22, DHHS pub. no. SMA 03-3836 (2003), revealing nearly identical rates of illegal drug use among whites and blacks, only a single percentage point between them; and Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings, NSDUH series H-34, DHHS pub. no. SMA 08-4343 (2007), showing essentially the same finding. See also Marc Mauer and Ryan S. King, A 25-Year Quagmire: The “War on Drugs” and Its Impact on American Society (Washington, DC: Sentencing Project, 2007), 19, citing a study suggesting that African Americans have slightly higher rates of illegal drug use than whites. Cited in Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow (p. 332). The New Press. Kindle Edition.

[2] Howard N. Snyder and Melissa Sickman, Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2006), reporting that white youth are more likely than black youth to engage in illegal drug sales. See also Lloyd D. Johnson, Patrick M. O’Malley, Jerald G. Bachman, and John E. Schulenberg, Monitoring the Future, National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2006, vol. 1, Secondary School Students, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH pub. no. 07-6205 (Bethesda, MD: 2007), 32, “African American 12th graders have consistently shown lower usage rates than White 12th graders for most drugs, both licit and illicit”; and Lloyd D. Johnston, Patrick M. O’Malley, and Jerald G. Bachman, Monitoring the Future: National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings 2002, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH pub. no. 03-5374 (Bethesda, MD: 2003), presenting data showing that African American adolescents have slightly lower rates of illicit drug use than their white counterparts. Cited in Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow (p. 332). The New Press. Kindle Edition.

Previous Post

June 10, 2020

Pursue the truth at all times, then follow it (part 2)

Next Post

June 17, 2020 The Bible and the Land of Promise: A Christian Conversation: Webinar This Friday June 19, 2020!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 000 1 Cor 11:17-34 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 10 Commandments 2 Corinthians 2 John 2 Peter 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy 3 John 666 Abortion Acts 2:42 Ahmaud Arbery AIPAC All Saints Day America antisemitism BDS Beast Betting Bible Bible study Biblical Interpretation Biden Book of Acts Boycott Campus Protests Catholicism Ceasefire Chavez Ravine Christian Nationalism Christian Zionism Christianity Today Christmas Church Colossians Communion Convict Leasing Covid-19 Craig Blaising creation Crucifixion Daoud Nassar Deception Deconstruction Democracy Devotional guide Discipleship Easter Eden Education Election End-times Ephesians Eschatology Ethnic Cleansing Evangelicalism Evangelicals Evolution Fall Famine Fascism FIFA Freedom of Speech Galatians Gary Burge Gaza Gaza; Genocide; Boycott Genesis Genocide George Floyd Global Warming God's will Gospel Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Government Grace Great Prostitute Hamas Harris healthcare Hebrews HeGetsUs Holy Spirit Holy Week Honor Father and Mother ICJ Immigration Indigenous peoples day Iran Israel Israel Palestine Itamar Ben Gvir James Jesus Joel Willits Jude Just war Justice Kamala Harris Kingdom Of God Kings and Queens land of Israel Law (OT) Lazarus Les Miserable LGBTQ+ Love Luke Mahmoud Khalil Man of Lawlessness Mark Mark of the Beast Marriage Martin Luther King Jr Mercy Mexican Repatriation Military-Industrial-Complex Ministry Mission Money NAFTA Nakba Netanyahu New Creation New Testament Nicaragua Nicodemus Non Violence Occupation Pacifism Palestine Parable Paul Peace Pentecost Peonage Philemon Philippians Politics Poor Power Prayer Pride Month Priests Pro-life Propaganda Prophesy Prophet Qatar Queen Elizabeth Racism Reconstruction Redemption Reformation Resurrection Revelation Roe v Wade Romans Romans 13:1-7 Rome Russia Sabbath Samaritan Seals Sermon Settlements Slavery Spiritual gifts Taxes Tent of Nations Terrorism The Beast Theology Titus Torture Trump truth Ukraine Uncategorized Veteran's Day War Warsaw Ghetto wealth Wedding Women World Cup 2022 Worldview Worship Wrath Yemen Zionism

Select a Month September 2026 May 2026 February 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 September 2017 July 2017 May 2017 November 2016 October 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I returned the stolen ark with gold tumors and gold rats after plagues struck our cities. Who are we?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Moabites The Ammonites The Amalekites The Philistines

Support this
Column