Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Understanding the Kingdom of God: Part 6 of 7

Understanding the Kingdom of God: Part 6 of 7

Last updated on: March 23, 2020 at 1:03 pm by Rob Dalrymple

Understanding the Kingdom of God: Part 6 of 7 2020-03-23T13:03:42-08:00 Rob Dalrymple

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Another key to understanding the nature of the kingdom of God is to discern that the kingdom of God refers to that which will last forever, while the kingdoms of the world are passing away.

This means that, since love is eternal (1 Cor 13:13), anytime we love (i.e., unconditional, sacrificial love and not a self-gratifying lust) we are living in accord with the kingdom of God.

In order to understand fully the nature of the kingdom of God it is important to discern the distinction that the Scriptures draw between “this age” (or the “present age”) and the “age to come” with regard to eternity.

The “present age” is one of apparent prosperity, peace, and safety now. Yet, by its very nature, the “present age” does not last forever. As 1 John 2:17 says, “The world is passing away.”

Psalm 73 provides a good illustration. The psalmist contrasts the prosperity of those who indulge in the present age with their final destiny.

The Psalm opens with a measure of exasperation on the part of the psalmist as he considers the life of the wicked. They are prosperous (Psalm 73:3), they have no pain, and they are fat (Psalm 73:4). The psalmist envies the apparent ease with which the wicked enjoyed life—though certainly, he exaggerates their worry-free life. His envy, in fact, almost caused him to stumble (Psalm 73:2).

The psalmist’s quandary—as to why he should live in obedience to God and yet suffer, while the arrogant and wicked prosper—comes to make sense only when he, “came into the sanctuary of God; Then I perceived their end” (Psalm 73:17).

Once he realized that, “Surely You set them in slippery places; You cast them down to destruction” (Psalm 73:18), he came to understand that their apparent prosperity was not everlasting and, consequently, not worth chasing.

The kingdoms of the world, then, may be summarized as that which will not last. In other words, “this age” refers to that which is both fallen and temporary. This is why Paul refers to it as, “this present evil age” (Gal 1:4).

The Christian life is indeed to be marked both by a rejection of the world and its desires, which, as 1 John says “is passing away” (1 John 2:17) and a faithful adherence to the kingdom of God. Paul urges:

“For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all men, instructing us to deny ungodliness and worldly desires and to live sensibly, righteously and godly in the present age, looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus” (Titus 2:11-13).

Ethics of the kingdoms/ages

The contrast of the kingdoms (or “ages”) then leads us to an understanding of one of the central ethical features of the New Testament. Namely, that in the kingdoms of the world (the “present age”) one aims for prosperity in the now, while in the kingdom of God (the “age to come”) one aims for prosperity in eternity.

Now, I am very reticent to use the word “prosperity” here. I use the term because it shows that the contrast between the two kingdoms is one of aiming for prosperity in the present versus prosperity in eternity.

The problem is that there is an underlying self-centeredness that is often inherent in the word “prosperity.” If our desire is for prosperity in eternity solely for the purpose of attaining security for ourselves, then we have missed the mark.

A key difference, in fact, between the nature of the kingdoms of the world and the kingdom of God is that the aim of one is self and the aim of the other is self-denying! In other words, and this is crucial, the kingdoms of the world are marked by self. Whereas, the kingdom of God is marked by self-denial (aka “love”).

The nature of the kingdoms, then, is that if you want to eat, drink, and be merry now, then play by the rules of this age. But, if you want to eat, drink, and be merry for eternity, then deny oneself and follow Christ.[1]

The Roman economy was based on debt and obligation. In this system, I do something for you and now you owe me! I invite you to dinner, and you invite me back at a later time. Now, until you pay me back, you remain in my debt.

The problem is that the poor could never pay things back. Consequently, no one would ever loan them anything, or invite them to dinner.[2] After all, the purpose of loaning was to get something in return. It is against this backdrop that we read the Gospel of Luke and Jesus’ ethic.

In Luke 6:20-26, we have Luke’s version of the beatitudes.[3] Unlike Matthew, Luke includes the blessings and the curses in the same passage.[4]

“Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.

Blessed are you who hunger now, for you shall be satisfied. Blessed are you who weep now, for you shall laugh.

Blessed are you when men hate you, and ostracize you, and insult you, and scorn your name as evil, for the sake of the Son of Man.

Be glad in that day and leap for joy, for behold, your reward is great in heaven. For in the same way their fathers used to treat the prophets.

But woe to you who are rich, for you are receiving your comfort in full.

Woe to you who are well-fed now, for you shall be hungry. Woe to you who laugh now, for you shall mourn and weep.

Woe to you when all men speak well of you, for their fathers used to treat the false prophets in the same way.”

Note that in Luke’s version, the contrast is between experiencing wealth now and experiencing wealth in eternity.

Note the clear contrasts: four blessings and four woes.

The first blessing is for the poor and the first woe is for the rich (6:20, 24). The second blessing is for the hungry and the second woe is for those who are well-fed (6:21, 25). The third blessing is for those who weep now and the third woe is for those who laugh (6:21, 25). And the final blessing is for those who are hated and insulted and the final woe is for those of whom men speak well (6:22, 26).

Note, also, that in the eschaton (the end; i.e., the kingdom of God) the roles are reversed: those who are hungry now will be fed and those who are well fed now will be hungry.[5]

Now there is no room in the Gospel of Luke, or any of the Gospels for that matter, to take Jesus’ words as implying that all the poor in this world will be blessed in eternity and all the wealthy in this world will suffer for eternity.

Jesus is, instead, contrasting those who adhere to His kingdom’s ethics, even though it may well cost them now, against those who seek material security and even prosperity in the kingdoms of the world. This is evident by the fact that the fourth blessing is for those who are hated, ostracized, insulted, and scorned, “for the sake of the Son of Man” (Luke 6:22).

[1] Cp the Parable of the Rich man and Lazarus: Luke 16:19-31. This is what the mark of the beast in Rev 13 entails. Without the mark, one cannot buy or sell (Rev 13:17). The mark need not be literal. After all, it simply conveys the notion that reverberates throughout the NT: to align with the world is to secure—to some extent at least—one’s place in the economy of the world. To abstain and wield the seal of God (Rev 7:2; 14:1-2) is to become an outcast of the world’s system.

[2] There is an additional problem in inviting the poor also. Namely, that such meals were all about honor. If you are honorable and come to my dinner then everyone thinks I must be someone special. Then when you, an honorable person in society, invite me to dinner at your place, it only serves to affirm my honorable status. Note: this exists in virtually all cultures. If I invite a local congressman to dinner, he/she probably won’t come. What do they have to gain politically by coming to my house?Nor, am I enough of an influential person for them to invite me to a dinner at their place.

[3] Cf Matt 5:3-12.

[4] Matthew places the blessings in 5:3-12 and the curses in Matt 23:13-36.

[5] This is precisely what Jesus illustrates by means of the Parable of the Rich man and Lazarus: Luke 16:19-31.

Biblical Interpretation

Previous Post

March 17, 2020

Covid-19 and the love of God: Is Covid-19 an act of God’s judgment? (Um, No! But keep reading!)

Next Post

March 23, 2020 Understanding the Kingdom of God: Part 7 of 7

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 000 1 Cor 11:17-34 1 Corinthians 1 John 1 Peter 1 Thessalonians 1 Timothy 10 Commandments 2 Corinthians 2 John 2 Peter 2 Thessalonians 2 Timothy 3 John 666 Abortion Acts 2:42 Ahmaud Arbery AIPAC All Saints Day America antisemitism BDS Beast Betting Bible Bible study Biblical Interpretation Biden Book of Acts Boycott Campus Protests Catholicism Ceasefire Chavez Ravine Christian Nationalism Christian Zionism Christianity Today Christmas Church Colossians Communion Convict Leasing Covid-19 Craig Blaising creation Crucifixion Daoud Nassar Deception Deconstruction Democracy Devotional guide Discipleship Easter Eden Education Election End-times Ephesians Eschatology Ethnic Cleansing Evangelicalism Evangelicals Evolution Fall Famine Fascism FIFA Freedom of Speech Galatians Gary Burge Gaza Gaza; Genocide; Boycott Genesis Genocide George Floyd Global Warming God's will Gospel Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Government Grace Great Prostitute Hamas Harris healthcare Hebrews HeGetsUs Holy Spirit Holy Week Honor Father and Mother ICJ Immigration Indigenous peoples day Iran Israel Israel Palestine Itamar Ben Gvir James Jesus Joel Willits Jude Just war Justice Kamala Harris Kingdom Of God Kings and Queens land of Israel Law (OT) Lazarus Les Miserable LGBTQ+ Love Luke Mahmoud Khalil Man of Lawlessness Mark Mark of the Beast Marriage Martin Luther King Jr Mercy Mexican Repatriation Military-Industrial-Complex Ministry Mission Money NAFTA Nakba Netanyahu New Creation New Testament Nicaragua Nicodemus Non Violence Occupation Pacifism Palestine Parable Paul Peace Pentecost Peonage Philemon Philippians Politics Poor Power Prayer Pride Month Priests Pro-life Propaganda Prophesy Prophet Qatar Queen Elizabeth Racism Reconstruction Redemption Reformation Resurrection Revelation Roe v Wade Romans Romans 13:1-7 Rome Russia Sabbath Samaritan Seals Sermon Settlements Slavery Spiritual gifts Taxes Tent of Nations Terrorism The Beast Theology Titus Torture Trump truth Ukraine Uncategorized Veteran's Day War Warsaw Ghetto wealth Wedding Women World Cup 2022 Worldview Worship Wrath Yemen Zionism

Select a Month September 2026 May 2026 February 2026 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 September 2017 July 2017 May 2017 November 2016 October 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Jireh" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Redeemer Provider Protector Savior

Support this
Column